50

Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito confirmed Friday he’s staying on the nation’s highest court, weeks after a swell of speculation about a possible retirement.

“Obviously, I’m here for another term,” Alito, 76, said in an interview published in The Wall Street Journal’s editorial section.

Discussion of Alito’s future hit a fever pitch in June, when a mistake by a veteran Supreme Court reporter at National Public Radio resulted in the erroneous publication of a previously prepared retirement story.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Honestly kind of a good thing. If he retired now, Trump gets to appoint his replacement, which would be someone younger and likely to stick around forever.

At least with him being 76, we can hope that a Republican version of an RBG happens and the next Democrat president gets to appoint his replacement instead.

[-] javasux@lemmy.world 45 points 3 hours ago

Baby Boomers, the "you can pry my position of power from my cold, dead hands" generation

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Is there any data showing they stayed in political roles longer than any other generation (obviously having to factor in average lifespans going up)?

[-] brem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Luckily for us all, the floor will literally be lava before any of us have to ever touch them or pry anything from their bodies.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Trollito is one of the worst, but I find it hilarious that he's staying, as that may prevent someone younger and who is even worse, taking his place in a lifetime position.

I hope all the old cons in there decide to stick around until Democrats get to pick their replacements. 😆

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

There's still work to be done to make the USA even more of a regressive hell-hole, I guess.

[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

RGB stayed, so why wouldn’t he?

Not that I want him to. But there’s no reason for him to go without changing the face of the country and the world for the next 50 years.

[-] zikzak025@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

From the Republican perspective, they'd want him to step down so Trump could appoint another younger judge who can lock in a conservative seat on the court for many more years to come.

Him staying runs the same risk as RGB staying: dying or being forced to retire early when a Democrat is in the White House, who would then nominate a less conservative judge.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 hour ago

It's a small blessing that such a careless expression of ego is bipartisan so he too might be able to die when it will change the political composition of the court.

[-] swade2569@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

Honestly not sure how to feel at the news. Love to see him gone, hate to see whatever new evil comes with the replacement.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

"The kick backs and perks are just too good!"

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Justices...uh... have terms now? can we start enforcing that?!

[-] Kayday@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They don't have term limits, which is what you'd want to enforce I imagine.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

they don't have terms, either. If they did, they'd be leaving unless the current president re-appoints them.

[-] notsure@fedia.io 3 points 2 hours ago

Thurgood Marshall turned in his grave when Clarence was approved. Earl Warren was the dynamo that energizes the senate heater.

[-] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

"I am not done with my treasoning and need more money for being a corrupt parasitic piece of shit"

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
50 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30703 readers
1799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS