574
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] rockSlayer 121 points 4 days ago

Two economists are at a park, and see an old dog turd. One dares the other to eat half of it for $500 which he does. Then he dares his friend to eat the other half for $500. He does.

After a little while, one says to the other "I feel like those dares were pointless. You gave me money to eat shit, and then I gave it back to you for eating shit".

The other responds, "nonsense, we just grew the economy by $1000!!"

[-] SippyCup@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

An economist is at a baseball game when he sees a man outraged that a hotdog costs twelve dollars, and a beer costs 20. "I just wanted to have a fun day with my family, but tickets are suddenly 100 dollars! Now this?!"

What an idiot, the economist thinks. Can't he see the revenue he's generating?? The economist pays 64 dollars for two hotdogs and two beers, which he immediately drops on the ground, which makes him very happy.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 days ago

"CapEx"being laundered to "revenue".

Very legal and very cool.

[-] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

It would be so immensely amusing if one of those companies got fined by the EU for something – with the fine calculated from their revenues. That should lead to some interesting fireworks.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago

I start thinking that the economic growth we have seen in 2025 and this year is mostly due to these kinds of shenanigans. It all gets counted as part of GDP, despite the fact nothing was actually produced.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

if you remove the bullshit AI spending we've been in a recession for awhile

[-] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

That's why measure of GDP is stupid. It counts every transaction. If you do your own lawn, cooked your own food, then you don't contribute to GDP. But if you hire someone else to do that, then you increase GDP.

Self sufficient communities are bad for the GDP. That's how they define "developed" country, because you have to pay everyone for everything

[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

The more I learn, the more I get upset just how well the elite sold the scam of the modern world

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 8 points 3 days ago

You're correct to think that. We're in a gigantic bubble and when it pops these assholes are going to make it all of our problem.

[-] FrChazzz@lemmus.org 12 points 3 days ago

It's almost like that scene in Office Space where the guys are trying to figure out money laundering, looking up the definition in the dictionary. Michel then says "What I don't understand is how these Neanderthal Mafia guys can be so good at crime and smart guys like us can suck so badly at it." It's almost like these tech guys watched that scene and said "yeah!"

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago
[-] areakode@riskeratspizza.com 8 points 4 days ago

Tip to tip.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

The circlejerk only continues until the first fella cums

[-] Akh@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

This seems like money laundering

[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

and how much taxes from all those transactions?

Because if normal people does this they won't have any money anymore at some points

[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Oh, zero. Actually, negative because of all the government money theyre wasting and eating and profitting from (privately, anyways. All of these companies bleed millions daily)

[-] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 days ago

Most countries tax companies on profit or dividends paid out, not revenue. Revenue-based taxation would defeat any industry that depends on another industry that depends on another industry.

Think about it this way: You want to build an electric car. You need to buy a battery pack. Now the company that builds your battery pack, they need refined lithium. The lithium refiner? Well, they need raw lithium.

Say mining the raw lithium costs 1000€ for a battery's worth. Now say all the companies involved make ZERO profit. Revenue tax is 10%.

Raw lithium mining company needs to charge 1100€ instead of 1000€ because of the tax. Now the lithium refiner needs to charge the battery manufacturer 1210€ because, again, the tax. And you now get to buy the battery for 1331€ because of the tax. Customer has to pay 1461€ for the battery in the car.

Meanwhile another company starts up. They mine raw lithium, process it, build the battery and then build the car. They only ever get paid once, so revenue tax is only on that 1000€. Customer pays 1100€ for the battery in the car.

This is also why companies get VAT back and only the final consumer really pays VAT. Otherwise every company would have to make everything from scratch to stay competitive, because every transaction gets taxed.

TL;DR: We only tax the actual profit. If you pass one dollar back and forth a billion times, you don't have to pay tax on a billion dollars in revenue, only if it ends up with the person who didn't have it originally does that person have to pay tax on that one dollar.

[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 4 points 3 days ago

Just burst already ffs.

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

tbf this is kinda the whole point of capitilism, keep people moving fake bullshit numbers around in a game of artificial scarcity/incentivized greed. meanwhile the oligarchs that actually run things can just have the government write em a blank check as needed

[-] Kraiden@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Oh it's so much worse than that...

(I can't figure out how to get a timestamped link on mobile. Skip to 29:34)

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, Anthropic and OpenAI are around a trillion dollars in debt to all these companies, they are never going to be profitable, it is physically impossible for them to do that.

And all these companies have hitched their main business model on AI (for Microsoft it is around 70%), so they will get massively hit when the bubble bursts. They can't allow that, so they just keep pumping more money into them, making the bubble bigger and bigger.

[-] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago
[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

None. It's a giant 69 hamster ferris wheel

[-] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago

how ? are the transactions free ? how do they move such quantity of money with out loosing some !

[-] Napster153@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It doesn't exist.

An all digital future is as vapid and has the physical value of a fart.

They are selling you the air you breathe and calling it money because they know if they had to produce the actual cash it would never match the amount they spend.

The French punished the Templars for debt the French couldn't pay and found the Templar vaults empty.

Weimar Republic printed ALL the money and rendered as worthless as toilet paper by malicious dumbness.

It has all happened before, it is now happening again with the same maliciousness.

[-] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 2 points 4 days ago

Accounts it as revenue to who?

[-] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

And nothing bad ever came of this…ever the end.

this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
574 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

17128 readers
597 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS