324

Immigration and Customs Enforcement has made yet another arrest at a New York City immigration court, despite a May ruling from a federal judge that broadly blocked such detentions.

U.S. District Judge Kevin Castel, a George W. Bush appointee, ruled May 18 that ICE never had the legal justification to make these arrests. His order, which applied to immigration courts in Manhattan, kneecapped the agency’s controversial strategy of detaining people as they arrived for mandatory immigration hearings.

Despite that, ICE has made at least six arrests in Manhattan immigration courts since Castel issued his order. The latest arrest came on Thursday, when agents detained Bronx resident Matar Ndiaye while he was “dutifully attending an immigration court hearing for his asylum claim,” according to court filings.

Contempt charges?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 66 points 1 week ago

Hmm, an unaccountable paramilitary force that flouts the law without consequences? It's getting really really fascist in this motherfucker.

[-] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And people are still doing nothing about it, and no, protests are not doing something about it

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago

Just like in Germany in the 30s.

[-] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What do you want to be done? The smart but feels bad move is to keep taking notes and keep taking names. The regime won't last forever and a blue wave is already coming.

For now, the thing being done will be more court fights between state and federal (aka notekeeping).

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 week ago

Why call them arrests? These are kidnappings.

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Because they're legally officers performing arrests in the fascist USA.

For the newspapers of the USA to call them kidnappings would be libel.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The first couple of paragraphs of the article explain why these are not legal arrests. ICE are legally forbidden from doing this, so their actions should legally be treated the same as if anyone else just grabbed people and imprisoned them.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

It's decidedly not legal, that's the point, they are breaking the law

[-] raze2012@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

The media is not on our side. They can't even put "illegal" in the title; they just soften it with "despite court orders..."

[-] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, and yet here are commenters whining that the media should step up and solve their fascism problem with accurate reporting.

The media won't solve it, the courts won't solve it, voting won't solve it, "someone else" won't solve it.

The US citizens acting in coordinated industrial strikes is all that will solve it currently, yet they don't. Another year or so and even that won't solve it.

[-] raze2012@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Well, there are quite a few high profile strikes. The big issues are

  1. They are not coordinated, because the groups don't really talk to each other
  2. The government as of now isn't exact one who will give a fuck about Mos worker strikes and will probably just throw the national guard at the problem (illegally)
  3. If we're being real, some people aren't yurt enough and still support this clownshow. Still a lot of "I got mine" attitude out there holding everything back.

It'll be a few years for sure. But I can definitely see some people fighting. Even if it's not enough.

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

This is all theater. The courts will hem and haw about rights and rule of law but ultimately wont do jack shit all to cement the SS...sorry ICEs position above the law and ability to take who ever when ever they want from where ever.

You're not wrong. The court was complicit as they can declare the "arrests" illegal.

Minor correction, these aren't the SS they are the SA. This is why we need to fight now, they're not yet organized enough to be the SS, they're still forming. We still have a chance to create enough political pressure to disband them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung

[-] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I tend to use the SS stamp because most people I talk to about this stare at you blankly when you say SA. Everyone knows who the SS were. You are right though here on Lemmy I should have made the distinction. Or you could also say potato potato lol

Tomato tomahtoe. Keep up the good fight

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

2 years down the line and they'll issue the third final warning to stop doing illegal things, which the appeals court will immediately stay because a few months without optimal inductions into the concentration camps is considered an irreversible harm.

[-] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

All the ice agents look like they have pink eye.

[-] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

And what's going to be done about it?

[-] MrRandom@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

wasn't the police supposed to arrest those ICE agents? but can they arrest themselves?

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe someone will set another building on fire.

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Wonder what Mamdani has to say about this? Or if he can/will do anything about it?

[-] Abyssian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He's brown, so if he makes too much of a stink NYPD will fire several warning shots into his back while he's "aggressively" tying a shoe.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Honestly, given how he capitulated to the NYPD, I’d imagine he can’t do much. I somehow doubt he would be allowed.

[-] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Most people have no choice but to capitulate to an organized and armed force, regardless of station in life.

It's an important lesson. One the working class should take to heart.

[-] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

What do you mean by this? First I’m hearing of it

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago

He'd campaigned on reining in the NYPD, but as soon as he was elected he specifically started praising them and hasn't done anything to curb some of the... well, more problematic elements. It is assumed that they threatened him or something, because him doing nothing about them goes against his supposed worldview and what he campaigned on. It's very well possible that the realities of being in office or just that his ability to affect things as Mayor isn't as powerful or robust as he'd thought. In any case, it's one of the few elements of his campaign he's gone back on.

[-] raze2012@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Hard to say. Mamdami has a lot of work to do and reforming the NYPD during these times is one of the larger tasks. That might be more for something during his 2nd term if he gets that far.

But I wouldn't be surprised if he got a lot of flak internally over these issues once he got in.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, I agree. I think it’s dumb to expect everything to get better overnight. The fact that he’s done as much as he has is amazing.

this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
324 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30591 readers
2010 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS