312

In May, the House Energy and Commerce Committee ‌voted 48-1 in favor of the Sunshine Protection Act. The U.S. Senate voted unanimously in March 2022 to make daylight saving time permanent but the House never took up the measure in the face ​of opposition. The proposal the House will consider next week would allow states ​to opt out.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 95 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This would be about the only good thing Republicans have done ever if they pass this. Hope they don't let states opt out. When I lived up north by Canada, the logic was "you don't want kids having to walk to/from school when it's dark!!" Okay, so... wow, did you know they could change school hours.

[-] Steve@communick.news 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

When I lived up north by Canada, the logic was "you don't want kids having to walk to/from school when it's dark!!" Okay, so... wow, did you know they could change school hours.

The same argument works the other way. Keep noon as the point where the sun is highest. Then change the times of things for appropriate daylight. Daylight savings is just people agreeing to get up an hour earlier. Instead of "9 to 5", everyone agrees to work 8 to 4. Which coincidentally puts solar noon perfectly in the middle of the work day. Isn't that a surprise!

[-] SnotFlickerman 35 points 3 weeks ago

Well, we're also in the 21st century and this jump an hour twice a year shit makes no sense. We could make timekeeping worldwide way more insane by having it adjust "imperceptibly" over time to auto adjust times worldwide based on true solar noon at each individual clock location using GPS. So all clocks would now have GPS as well to be able to ping their location to get the appropriate time. This... would be insane. We'd have seconds that are longer than a second. LET'S DO IT.

[-] PlantJam@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

This is my vote. If we're going to mess with the clocks, let's REALLY mess with them. I guess not messing with them would also be okay, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

I get confused, but what I prefer based on living far north is for evenings to be longer. It seems wrong to me when winter approaches and the sun starts going down around 6-7, then bam, the time change happens and the sun starts going down at 5. It's the exact opposite of what I'd prefer. I guess people active in the early morning like it. Ultimately I just think it's dumb to change the clocks. We should just pick one or the other.

[-] Steve@communick.news 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Everyone agrees to stop changing. The only contention is how. Stay on DST, or stay on Standard Time. Lots of people say like you, "More daylight in the evening please!" But they don't realise all DST does is trick people into getting up early by lying to them, and breaking noon from the sun. Staying on standard time keeps the time sun connection. Then the "standard work day" can be changed to the more appropriate 8 to 4. You get the same effect as DST without lies, tricks, and changing solar noon. It's cleaner than permanent DST.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago

We live in time zones. “Standard” time is just as much a fiction as DST. I’ve never lived somewhere where the sun is directly overhead at noon. I suppose such places must exist; some of them might even be on standard time when it does. In my area, it’s closer to directly overhead during DST.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] SippyCup@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Also school: let's start activities at 6 AM in winter. And not finish until 10PM. No the bus only runs for school hours why do you ask?

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 14 points 3 weeks ago

School hours are engineered to make sure parents can drop their kids off at the state-funded daycare (which is what most parents consider school) and get to work on time...

And the reason the high-school kids get out first is so they can take care of younger siblings after school, which is a shitty way for teenagers to spend afternoons. (I was lucky, youngest of six.)

[-] Jordan117@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, we tried it in the 70s and people hated it enough to switch back pretty quickly. Under permanent DST, sunrise in January would not be until after 8 AM, while under permanent standard time sunrise in June would be shortly after 4 AM.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

As I always say, "A broken clock is right twice a day."

[-] HorreC@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

This saying bothers me, this assumes the clock is not running, a working clock could not be running, but a broken clock could just lose a minute a day, and it would never be right but a few times a year.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

This would expand that to four hours a day.

[-] LMurch@thelemmy.club 8 points 3 weeks ago

I hope the Dems read all the small print, like, "Daylight Savings is now permanent...and brown people have no rights...."

[-] adarza@piefed.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago

change the school hours for the shifting daylight hours, you'd also have to change parents' work schedules.. or provide some child care benefits, maybe. and we know how that would go over with this congress and administration.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Speculater@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

SHUT THE FUCK UP! OKAY? They vote on this every fucking year and it dies in the Senate. Big Clock is going to lobby this shit until I die. Just shut up. Stop talking about it. Daylight Savings will be in the USA for at least another hundred years.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

^^^^ Legitimately one of the funniest things I've read in a long time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

I didn't even say anything!

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Dude, what did he say?! Shut up!

[-] Floodedwomb@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

It passed in the Senate. It died in the house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

It’s actually been gaining steam over the past 5-ish years. If it dies in the end, it’s because people can’t agree which time should be permanent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nroth@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago

Standard Time should be the default. And sadly, we don't even have that. Even our Standard Time has been mucked with. This website is a good source (not mine by the way). https://savestandardtime.com/ Let businesses change their hours instead of making people change clocks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 weeks ago

Trump just fired the federal election commission and fucks kids. Epstien files.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

Standard time is better for health, and much less stupid to have the clock synced to the day cycle

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 14 points 3 weeks ago

I assume you don't live somewhere where it gets dark at 3pm in winter. The morning will be dark regardless, let me have that little bit of sun coming home from work

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] swade2569@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Agreed. After living most of my life in the PNW, having summer twilight as late as 10 PM was terrible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago

Lucy removes the football in 3...2...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Boo, the permanent time should be standard time, it's standard for a good reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] valar@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago
  1. "Allow states to opt out?" Isn't this already something under their control? How is this a federally mandated thing? I mean Arizona already doesn't do it.

  2. if its a federal decision just make the change apply everywhere. No one wants every state doing this differently. Think of the poor programmers.

[-] folekaule@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

On your first question: the current law is that DST is optional, but if a state opts out, they have to be on standard time. The new bill allows them to stay on DST permanently and removes the ability for states to opt-out unless they are already on year-round standard time. So, if this passes, every state in the union will be on either standard time or DST, depending on their status before, with no option to either go back to standard time nor to go back to changing twice a year.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

The answer is simple.

The government shouldn't be telling us what time it is. We should leave that to the private sector. And you should be required to pay for a subscription to know what time it is.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 19 points 3 weeks ago

Of the two options they could have standardized on they picked the worst one. This literally defeats the point of noon

[-] deadmyk@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago
[-] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 weeks ago

Why not just move school and work start times an hour or two later in the winter in Colorado then? Why hold the entire country hostage because of niche locations that already have the ability to make local decisions like this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jambudz@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago

Noon should be noon, not 1.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

As someone who works too damn early, please let's be sensible and do permanent standard time.

I'm sorry Canada, you're usually right, but you're wrong about this

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] classic@fedia.io 11 points 3 weeks ago

Getting rid of this and getting the u.s. to finally do to metric are my two low bar societal dreams before I die

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stretch2m@infosec.pub 11 points 3 weeks ago

Who even fucking cares anymore? How about demanding proof of life from the Senate Majority Leader? Stop wasting your breath on this bullshit.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 10 points 3 weeks ago

Ending the clock change is a great idea. The question becomes, do we want to:

Go the permanent daylight saving route. Be an hour off from the rest of the world adding to the stack of weird and arguably stupid things the USA does different so we can have a bit of light after work instead of questioning why we're working our lives away. Also, drastically increase the number of morning injuries and fatalities, especially among children, as schools will be starting in the dark.

OR

Be sane.

It appears Congress has spoken.

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Because of existing time zones aren’t we already different from the rest of the world? You make other good points but the rest of the world comparison seems odd. If anything just picking one is more consistent and safer regardless. I mean if you wanna talk about weird, the entire mainland china is one time zone, China Standard Time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I'm too lazy to find my years old comment on this but they didn't vote on it because they pocketed it to use as a rider base or ticket.

There is literally no opposition, they wanted to use it to pass other bills or measures at the same time because it has complete bipartisan support.

Congress sucks ass.

[-] impairedimperator@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 weeks ago

You know, waking up outside of your circadian rhythm can really fuck with you. So, I propose daylight fairness time. Instead of splitting up timezones by hours, we should split timezones by one (1) minute increments. This allows people to most effectively decide their living location to match their own personal circadian rhythm!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mangobanana@discuss.online 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I love living in one of the 2 states that DON'T change time . I absolutely hated it and always thought it was stupid all the back and forth it's only an hour, just leave it at one time (honestly I don't care which). I used to live in the Midwest and the time change was the bane of my existence

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Should split the difference and go with a permanent 30 minute offset just to screw with everybody.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 3 weeks ago

We should all just use UTC. To be honest. It's not like noon has to be at 12'oclock everywhere.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago

Feel free. There's nothing stopping you.

The reason it's not feasible is because most human activity happens during the daylight hours. As such, having the unit of a "day" cover what's typically a day makes things easier.
For example, banks , businesses and schools need to have a unified schedule across a jurisdiction. If the jurisdiction specifies a utc offset that defines the official business day you just have a less coordinated timezone system.
You also make knowing roughly what part of the waking cycle other parts of the world are in much harder. Right now it's 0100 in utc-5. So it's 0800 in utc+2, and people are eating breakfast, at work, getting kids to school and so on. If I want to know that without timezones I need to know where they are on the planet and what the relevant legal jurisdiction has mandated as coordinated business time. That's effectively just a worse version of timezones.

The human conception of time is intrinsically linked to spatial location. Fighting that is just making it hard for no reason. What we need to do is stop fiddling with the time. No more (major) clock adjustments. Daylight savings only sucks because of the switch , so we should just pick one and stay.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
312 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30654 readers
1819 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS