666

New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, exalted the city’s legacy of immigrants on Friday in a historically laden, ideological counterpoint to a US semiquincentennial address that was expected later in the day from Donald Trump – who has sought to deport immigrants en masse throughout his second presidency.

Speaking from behind a desk at New York’s city hall that belonged to the US’s first president, George Washington, and which itself is a century older than the Resolute desk in the White House, Mamdani was surrounded by naturalized citizens like himself as he listed the waves of immigrants who shaped the city.

“Hundreds of thousands of Irish immigrants arrived with stomachs aching from a famine manufactured by imperial cruelty,” Mamdani said. “Chinese sailors settled in what is today Chinatown. Millions more traveled under the Statue of Liberty and through Ellis Island. Jewish people escaping pogroms, Italians fleeing poverty. Syrians seeking economic opportunity.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] macaro 117 points 1 week ago

“My fellow Americans” Mamdani knows the context of this phrase. Not my fellow New Yorkers.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

I see comments from people all over the world who say Mamdani is their mayor, too ❤️‍🔥 Certainly hope more Americans outside of NYC can feel the same.

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 52 points 1 week ago

He's turning into an amazing Mayor... Here's hoping he can carry it off. The part the conservatives are most afraid of is that his plans will work...because they will (are already to an extent) work and serve as a template for other cities and states if they do.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They talk about "mini mamdanis" like it's a bad thing lol

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 19 points 1 week ago

I want a maxi-mamdani.. Like 3 or 4 of them in one candidate. ;-)

[-] aaa999@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 10 points 1 week ago

I will vote as far left int he primaries as I can..

But in the general, I will vote as far left as I can. Don't care who it is.

He will also make a amazing governor

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 2 points 1 week ago

I think so too...but that's a much harder fight... NY state isn't as left leaning as NYC....

[-] SlimJ@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

True but the entire state's politics are based off of the millions of voters in the city.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 14 points 1 week ago

Definitely setting himself up for a future presidential (or at least Congressional) run.

And given his track record so far, I'd be happy to see that. Too bad the DNC will stop at nothing to prevent it from happening.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well, and the constitution. Mamdani can't be president and he's well aware of that and fine with it I think

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago

Is he not a natural born citizen? Ah, too bad. I wasn't aware of that.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Well Trump can't be president either. Yet here we are.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I don’t agree with that interpretation, and many scholars would argue it needs to be deliberated by scotus (but not this one) to settle things once and for all.

The 14th amendment is quite clear, naturalized citizens are US citizens. And article 2 says US citizens can be president.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, well, I wouldn't expect an ML user to be able to read, so that tracks

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Ooohh, sick burn. For an ignoramus.

Try reading it for yourself

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There's been some debate on what constitutes natural-born, mostly related to parental citizenship and territories in particular; but the language (and consensus over the last few two centures) is quite clear...

The 14th amendment is quite clear, naturalized citizens are US citizens

And being a citizen is not enough.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Ok but why is that the consensus interpretation? Do you think there might be some racial bias there which should be reexamined by the courts? I do.

I’m glad you agree with my interpretation of the 14th, because that is actually the part that is considered more up for debate.

I still don’t think you’ve read the relevant portion of article 2, so let me provide it for you here:

1.5 No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;

a citizen of the United States

Can you explain to me why this “isn’t enough”?

[-] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution

Mamdani has not been a citizen when the constitution was adopted.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~This is why it needs further consideration imo. To me, that comma means that these are the criteria for presidency once the constitution is adopted.~~

~~If it means citizen at the time of adoption, would they not have omitted the comma to make it more clear?~~

You know what, I stand corrected and learned more about this today. There was a case Hassan v. State of New Hampshire (2012) which already examined this and established natural born isn’t repealed by the 14th, plus some debates by Congress around the time the 14th passed that firms up that interpretation. I still think that comma is sus though.

[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The SC has been diverging from precedent and ignoring the prevailing interpretation of the constitution for a while. It's just a political branch now, thanks to the republicans. Once the democrats take back control, they can do the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Sadly, he can't be president under the current constitution. But he would be far superior to any current and upcoming candidates.

[-] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago

He held it in front of recently naturalized immigrants. One line I'll paraphrase I found interesting when he referred to them: they didn't see themselves not just as New Yorkers, but American too, just like he did some 10 years ago.

This tells immigrants in New York that they may not be American (yet), but they are New Yorkers. Very beautiful notion.

[-] homes@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I’m done he knows when he says that, he means it

However, refreshing to vote for a politician, who doesn’t have to lie

[-] homes@piefed.world 75 points 1 week ago

possibly my favorite gif in the last 5 years, maybe ever

g5vqIL5Hquh8pY6.gif

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago

My face when they say taxing billionaires will make them leave the state.

Mfw they say the DSA is taking over the Democratic party.

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago

"Oh no! The people who aren't paying taxes are going to leave? Whatever will we do!?!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 61 points 1 week ago

Pro immigrant speech for 4th of july is way more appropriate than anything trump says ever

[-] darvocet@infosec.pub 33 points 1 week ago

He gives me so much hope. I know better, but it still happens.

[-] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 17 points 1 week ago

Hope changes the world...even if it's a little bit at a time.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago

He's going to run for president, and the DNC is going to sabotage the fuck out of his campaign ... even in the general election, if it comes to that. They'd rather see a Republican win than a Democratic Socialist.

[-] LemmyFeed@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

He can't run for president unfortunately because he was born outside of the US.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago

Ah, damn. Didn't know that.

[-] Tolos@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

I watched the whole speech. It's about 15 minutes long but really good. About the best I could have hoped for from a political America 250 speech.

It's the best kind of patriotic speech, talking about the things that make America great (diversity and community and opportunity) and acknowledging faults past and present. And throwing shade at Trump and white nationalists.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I expect him to have a way bigger audience than Trump.

[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

A moderately well baked potato would have a way bigger audience than Trump.

[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Whow! hold up, are you saying you would not show up for a baked potato? At least the baked potato shares your views on butter!

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Props for telling the truth about the Irish Famine.

[-] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 week ago

Shit, props for mentioning it at all

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I think it’s a good way to attempt to provoke empathy in Irish descendants by drawing parallels between shared immigrant experiences.

[-] GolfFoxtrotLima@ani.social 14 points 1 week ago
[-] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

He's new in politics and he's already acting like a president. Could we see a new FDR in our lifetime? Both are New Yorkers after all.

[-] 0ops@piefed.zip 16 points 1 week ago

He's not eligible because he isn't a natural born citizen. That said I'd totally vote for him

[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

And yet America is about to crown a 3rd term President. Interesting indeed.

[-] RadicalBrutus@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Go Zohran! 🇺🇸🗽

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2026
666 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30432 readers
2568 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS