111
The eugenics guy is balding and wears glasses but thinks he has superior genetics. Lmao.
But have you seen his jeans?? Nobody needs good genes with jeans like that!
Ban on pregnant women: Twisted, disgusting, and sadly probably doable for a fascist hellstate like MAGA is trying for.
Forced sterilization of all foreign visitors: So ludicrously stupid as to be laughable. This person (derogatory) has a truly unhinged seven-point plan which is not only completely impossible, it's in a bonkers order:
-
Nullification (red states stop issuing birth certificates to Undesirables)
-
Pack the court (hilariously showing that the right has no new ideas)
-
Ban on pregnant women entering the US
-
Ban on women entering the US
-
Forced sterilization of tourists (the women you're not allowing in? You want to sterilize no one?)
-
The union is dissolved (why would you sterilize random people before you just went full Confederacy? Surely you could be even more cruel if you divested yourself of the pesky Constitution and its annoying Bill of Rights first!)
-
This is where it gets really unhinged: then he wants to amend the constitution. For a country that no longer exists, to stop women who are incapable of reproduction from illegally entering the US in case they're illegally pregnant because the packed court you hand-picked can't be trusted not to validate the birth certificates that states aren't issuing.
Even if you take this as a list of options instead of an ordered plan, the fact that a constitutional amendment is considered the last option just boggles the mind. These are an unserious people; toddlers making pouty-faced pronouncements and whining about people touching them.
A typical case of "modern problems require Nazi solutions". Perfectly fine...
A sad fascist is the second best kind of fascist.
What's the first?
Dead
These asshats don’t deserve attention. Not even negative attention, just a lonely echo chamber.
This from the pro-forced-birth party
The problem this guy has is preggo women giving birgh and boom citizenship. I think a solution to this is to give citizenship by heritage, not birth place.
Why not just go by the constitution? You know, the highest law of the land? It's explicit and clear about who is a citizen.
There's a process to change the constitution. If they want to go that route they have to follow that process.
Isn't that exactly what they want? The US does both which afaik is not the norm but has been traditionally seen as a positive for the growth of the country.
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
111 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30456 readers
2171 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS