363

Palm oil is a butter substitute. Every baked product at the grocery store that used to be made with butter is now made with palm oil, because it is cheaper. Palm oil is made up of long highly-saturated fatty acids that cause it to be solid at room temperature, giving it physical properties very similar to butter, making it suitable as a substitute. However saturated fatty acids are bad for your health. Butter is also saturated fat and is also somewhat bad, but palm oil is much worse because the varieties of fatty acids it contains are much different from animal fat fatty acids and the human body metabolizes them differently, so they have a much higher impact. Similar physical properties but worse health properties!

It is nearly impossible to find frozen baked goods that are still made with butter. This pie claims to be made with healthy ingredients, and specifically touts its butter content, but it conveniently omits mentioning palm oil entirely. Since palm oil appears first on the ingredients list before butter, that means there is more of it. Possibly almost the entire "butter-like" fraction of the pie consists of palm oil.

This pie alone contains 400% daily value saturated fat, which is terrible for long-term health. I love apple pies and I was planning to eat this pie as my sole food over the course of 2 days for my One-Meal-A-Day (OMAD), but I'm not willing to risk eating palm oil. Thanks for nothing for getting my hopes up, pie box!

  • traditional wholesome German ingredients like palm oil
  • palm oil - just the way grandma used to make at home
  • contains memories of butter

I'm sure someone below will mention how palm oil is also bad for the environment and bad for the farmers and bad for the economy. I will only be answering questions about the film Rampart.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] starlinguk@lemmy.world 100 points 1 month ago

The bad thing about palm oil isn't how unhealthy it is (because what it is replacing isn't healthy either); the bad thing is that palm farmers have destroyed many thousands of square miles of rain forest. When you fly from Singapore to Jakarta, virtually all rain forest you used to fly over is now palm. It's an unmitigated environmental disaster.

[-] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 month ago

You're right, but if we used butter instead, the necessary cows would surely require yet more space.

[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

It’s not a choice between palm oil or butter. You can create a vegan pie easily. Yummie yummie.

[-] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago
[-] notsosure@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

Nope, it contains bits and pieces of orangutans.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 9 points 1 month ago

It depends on your definition of veganism. There is no animal product in it, but to use it in the quantities we do requires the destruction of a lot of habitat that certain animals require to survive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Since veganism is mainly about ethicality, i'd guess not.

[-] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

ethicality

Only when it comes to animals. You can be an almond milk drinking vegan despite the amount of water necessary to make an almond. You can be a palm oil vegan despite the amount of habitation destruction necessary for palm oil to be economically viable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Its replacement depends on the product you're trying to make. Like, they could not remove the cocoa butter from chocolate, for example.

Which reminds me, someone gave me a bunch of chocolate bars with a large "rainforest alliance" logo on it that had palm oil as the second ingredient. They're inedible.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Do you have an alternative to suggest that's less ecologically damaging? I keep hearing complaints about palm oil but I've never heard an alternative suggestion that doesn't involve even more land use.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 39 points 1 month ago

Who eats pie thinking it's healthy?

[-] nerdspice@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 month ago
[-] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

It could be argued that is, but that company is small enough they can get away with it. The larger the food company is the more conservative they tend to be with callouts like that on pack. Lawyers would typically only pursue claims against mega food companies, and even then it would be a class action where everyone gets $5 or some shit

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 month ago

Worried about health. Planned to eat nothing but pie for 2 days.

Wat?

[-] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Palm oil is also bad for farmers, the environment, and the economy

Also this company is owned by the dickhead maga mayor in my state that we struggle against constantly. So, fascist pies.

Sorry, genuinely. This is a shitty thing to learn post purchase

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

Thankfully I always check ingredients before purchase. Haven't had my fill of apple pie in months. 😭

this company is owned by the dickhead maga mayor in my state

The plot thickens!

[-] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

They only way to get good actual butter pies of any kind these days is to make it yourself, for better or worse.

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Depends on where you are. Where I am, we have little farm shops and bakeries that sell frozen pies that are the real deal. Unfortunately that's very dependent on location but might be worth a look.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 month ago

For all those decrying the ethics of palm oil - you are aware of the yields per hectare of the various plant oils, right?

  • Soybean: 0.47 ton oil/ha/year
  • Sunflower: 0.78 ton oil/ha/year
  • Rapeseed: 0.74 ton oil/ha/year
  • Palm Oil: 3.36 tons oil/ha/year

Would anybody like to suggest how to switch away from palm oils without deforesting what remains of the Amazon?

[-] Buckshot@programming.dev 17 points 1 month ago

The difference is the others don't require a tropical environment to grow. So you can grow them without any deforestation.

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

Globally, palm oil occupies approximately 19 million hectares (about 47 million acres) of land.

Despite supplying over one-third of the world's vegetable oil, this footprint is remarkably small—using less than 10% of the total land allocated to all oil-producing crops worldwide.

Where are you suggesting to find another 500 million acres of land, a tad more than the size of Alaska, without environmental impact?

[-] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The obvious answer is some of the Land used to grow soybeans and corn for animal feed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] consumptionone@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Aren't some of those plants grown in plains? I don't think the yield per hectare is the whole story. Palm oil is tropical, leading to deforestation, but at least some of the others you listed are not.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Sergio@piefed.social 20 points 1 month ago

That "handmade touch" claim sounds like BS too. wtf does "hand-crisped crust" mean? and something tells me "filled by hand" just means that a human hand pushed a button. "This pie is meticulously crafted" LOLZ thanks, Michaelangelo.

[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty skeptical that palm oil is more unhealthy than butter. The farming practices surrounding it's production are not wholesome sure. But it tastes good and cost less than butter.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Good find, it’s shady as fuck they healthy-wash the processed food. But your post is also interesting for a second reason- you care about eating healthy and do some specific diet, and yet you plan to live on frozen apple pie, whose nutritional value, traditional or not, is practically just sugar with fat? Unexpected choice for a conscious diet.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Honestly, that part about eating nothing but pie for two days makes me feel like this is a ~~mood~~ mild but elaborate troll.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Brokkr@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

The misleading advertising aside (seems bad, but it's not what I want to focus on), you claim that palm oil is bad for a person's health.

This article claims with evidence that it is likely no worse than other saturated fats and may in fact be better for overall health than other sources of saturated fat: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4365303/

I am truly interested to know if palm oil is much worse than other saturated fats, so if you have additional source worth reviewing it would be appreciated.

The authors do not note any conflicts of interest either, hopefully they were honest.

Other facts about palm oil which are commonly raised are the sustainability. I did not look into this aspect and further research may be needed.

[-] danciestlobster@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

The real honest answer is it depends. Almost nothing in terms of food is universally better or worse. Calorically, Palm tends to be higher, with some exceptions (due to higher water content in butter). Palm can be made with a ton of different levels of saturation, which is why it's popular in manufacturing (also cost), but how saturated makes a huge difference to how bad it is for you and doesn't need to be labeled. Then there is consideration for natural occurrence of positive vitamins and minerals in some fat sources, or the perceived negative impacts of relatively more processed or less processed fats. Then peoples individual biology's make some choices better than others for them personally.

The most general advice I can give is pay less attention to the source of the fat and more to the nutrition facts call-out for saturated fat (more=bad), from a purely health perspective. From a purely taste perspective, for pies butter and lard are more premium fats and all other sat fats are worse

[-] TauZero@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The authors do not note any conflicts of interest

The scientists are from Nigeria, one of the largest producers of palm oil, so it could be in their nationalistic interest to dismiss palm oil health concerns to promote their international exports. It's like reading an article about how ICE cars are better for the environment than electric cars written by an American.

They themselves admit in the opening abstract that "Most of the information in mainstream literature is targeted at consumers and food companies with a view to discourage the consumption of palm oil." I'll stick with doing what the mainstream tells me until and unless the mainstream changes.

Some of the links in the paper are more interesting though because they include actual randomized experiments, like the one where people were randomly assigned to switch to palm olein oil or olive oil for cooking, and both were about as good for their cholesterol levels. Palm olein is the liquid fraction of fractionated palm oil, high in oleic acid. I am actually open to the idea that palm olein could be better than some of the other cooking oils like soybean oil or corn oil, which I also avoid at all cost, or lard. However whether palm olein is a better substitute for soybean oil is a separate question from whether the solid palm oil is a better substitute for butter, which the Nigerian paper just lumps all in the same category. It's the highly-saturated fatty acids in the solid fraction, the same ones that make palm oil butter-like, that are the problem for my pie search.

[-] jak@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The scientists are from Nigeria, one of the largest producers of palm oil, so it could be in their nationalistic interest to dismiss palm oil health concerns to promote their international exports.

That’s a valid point, but it could be that they’re looking at the global reaction to something they’ve consumed locally for thousands of years with consternation and wanted to investigate it.

I'll stick with doing what the mainstream tells me until and unless the mainstream changes.

That feels like it might have sounded different in your head or I’m not understanding what you mean. There have been many examples of an incredibly unhealthy thing being very mainstream (lead, more than once, but also arsenic, radium, and mercury, for some of the most egregious examples, but pharmaceutical history is also full of this), so I don’t know why you would want to default to the mainstream on this if that’s what you did mean.

whether palm olein is a better substitute for soybean oil is a separate question from whether the solid palm oil is a better substitute for butter, which the Nigerian paper just lumps all in the same category

This is also a fair criticism, and I wish there were more research.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 15 points 1 month ago

However saturated fatty acids are bad for your health.

Saturated Fats have been much maligned by Ancel Key's lipid heart hypothesis, but it doesn't stand up to modern scrutiny - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.077

Saturated fats are not bad for your health.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was with you at the beginning, but—

This pie alone contains 400% daily value saturated fat, which is terrible for long-term health.

A single serving only contains 40%. Not great, but not as terrible as you're making it out to be. (And unlike a lot of packaged food, the size of a serving here is pretty reasonable.) Very few foods are good for long-term health when eaten alone, and singling out this particular one because it doesn't fit with your specific use case weakens your argument.

They are lying about the ingredients. That's true, and it should be noted because false advertising is terrible for consumers. Not because it's bad for a one-meal-a-day fad diet, but because it's bad in general for anyone who buys a product based on what is on the label.

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

Also, palm oil means child labor

[-] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As a Malaysian, one of the world's leading exporters of palm oil, no it fucking doesn't. Source ethical if that's a concern, just like chocolate or coffee or tea, but don't tar the entire industry with the same brush.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

German here and I can say I'm turning around half the cartons in the supermarket and check for palm oil. I'll try to buy alternatives. Though it's really hard. It's either price increase, shrinkflation or cheaper ingredients. Oftentimes a combination of those.

In case of the Apple Pie: Channel the German grandma inside of you and bake it yourself. It's not too hard. Takes an hour or so, though.

[-] varnia 9 points 1 month ago

The smell and the taste of self made apple pie with simply butter, flour, sugar and apples is unbeatable. Don't buy comfort "foods" like this - learn to make them yourself.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Pretty much every prepared food item is trash at this point. What kills me is the marketing. They just print “made with fresh, wholesome ingredients :)” on a package of health themed frozen waffles that cost $3 more per box and apparently that’s all it takes for people to believe they’re making a real attempt at healthy eating

[-] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

-wholesome ingredients like butter

-butter are listed after palm oil

Your rage is justified, but i feels like, with sugar content that high, you should probably avoid eating it that often anyway, so whether they use palm oil, vegie oil, or butter, shouldn't be too big of a problem other than the misleading marketing.

I myself am hobbyist baker, whenever i see people diss vegie oil/margarine because they use the wholesome butter, and they themselves also use vegie oil/palm oil/margarine, it kinda mildly infuriating to me. To me, whether you use palm oil or butter it can affect the texture you're chasing, so it really shouldn't be butter or nothing.

[-] BeUnique@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

What are you talking about? This is just like grandma used to make it! With a heaping glob of palm oil scooped out by her palm, measured by eye yet always coming out the same constant taste.

Too bad after the 18th heart attack, poor Mee Maw is in heaven now but she sure did love her palm oil.

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Also, harvesting palm oil is highly destructive to habitats for large cats and orangutans.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
363 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46959 readers
1047 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS