134
submitted 2 weeks ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/linux@lemmy.ml
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 58 points 2 weeks ago

The company's reason is "brand protection":

We carefully reviewed the project you shared with us (https://github.com/linuxwacom/wacom-hid-descriptors). While we appreciate the initiative, we found that this is primarily a Wacom-led project, and the potential impact for GAOMON would be quite limited. Even if we added support for our devices, the system would still show the device as a GAOMON model, but the overall setup would display Wacom branding. More importantly, participating would require sharing our device specifications directly with Wacom – which is not something we can consider.

The last part of that reply is very wrong.

The article also has a reply from Peter Hutterer, a "senior software engineer at Red Hat and a maintainer of Linux's core input device handling infrastructure since decades", which is worth reading.

[-] jodanlime@midwest.social 50 points 2 weeks ago

It makes me only look at Wacom, because of their strong Linux support, so probably not great for the other companies.

[-] mmmm@sopuli.xyz 16 points 2 weeks ago

Have had a small cheap wacom bamboo for more than 10 years. Not only the device works great in itself and it's quite sturdy but its support on Linux has always been stellar. Absolutely no complaints whatsoever.

[-] jodanlime@midwest.social 1 points 1 week ago

I have also had similar results with my small Wacom bamboo, I should use it more but I have been too busy no do much creative these days.

[-] helix@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Which, incidentally, proves the point of their marketing department.

[-] helix@feddit.org 37 points 2 weeks ago

reply from Peter Hutterer

Not to dunk on his achievements, but his argument is basically that it doesn't matter because the end user doesn't see any libwacom branding.

However, when they upgrade their package, it will show the Wacom name. I don't think it's unreasonable to rename the project to something which is more descriptive, especially since it contains way more than Wacom code.

I can understand both sides. I also think that you shouldn't bow to corporate interests in general, for example to marketing departments of any company.

However by keeping the Wacom name you're basically giving them special treatment just because they came first. Vendor neutral projects should be named vendor-neutrally, IMHO.

[-] jodanlime@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

I think I agree with everything you said. It seems fair to rename the package to be more universal. I didn't look into this too far but I don't think Wacom is forcing their name into the driver, I think it's just more difficult to change everywhere than it might seem.

[-] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm feeling pretty justified in sticking with Wacom. I only replaced my first tablet because it had a 4:3 aspect ratio and a serial port. (I could've lived with the latter, but the aspect ratio was making things skewed on a modern display.)

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
134 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

66371 readers
384 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS