53
submitted 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by Valuy@lemmy.zip to c/opensource@lemmy.ml
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Gee thx Bill, nobody teally knew what kind of company Microslop was until you explained it.

[-] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 6 points 3 hours ago

Thats always where things are right before the over leveraging of a company's market dominance makes them less competitive and they fall off 😅

[-] wiki_me@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 hours ago

according to the internet he has a return on investment of about 9% in the last 10 years (CAGR). msci world index (which is usually used to compare to see how well a fund performs, and has index funds which track it) made around 13.65% (so a lot higher).

So i would not put too much attention to this guys opinion, sure maybe he is taking less chances (less scary drops in the fund value that some investor don't like) but looking at the graphs it doesn't seems that way.

I think it's a good to do this exercise , a lot of active investing seems like snake oil (although probably not all of it, at least according to some data and research). someone even wrote a book on the subject called "Where are the Customers' Yachts".

[-] SW42@lemmy.world 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

Fuck this guy in particular. One of the wall street scum bags at the same level as a16z. If they think something is good you can bet it’s the opposite.

[-] Babalugats@feddit.uk 38 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)
[-] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

That's what Linux had needed for years. The reason Windows took over was because they won the business/government market.

Omce the tools for business/government mature and companies start offering proprietary software compatable with Linux by default, it will snowball.

[-] stolig@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

The beginning of the balkanization of the internet

[-] helix@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

He has a point, even though it's not a good one: Microsoft sells lots of products in a bundle at a certain price point which is hard to beat if you need all of the products in the bundle.

However, nobody needs even many of the products. Most of the time companies only use a few of them and even then, they often only use some of them because they're bundled, not because they're good.

It's basically "bundle a few good products with a few shitty products so everyone uses the shitty products because they're 'free'". Vendor Lock-In.

People didn't switch to other products since they were "good enough", but lately Microsoft products slowly become so bad that even the laziest people realise they might want to switch.

[-] Arancello@aussie.zone 24 points 6 hours ago

What’s the worst thing you could find on Mars? Microsoft Teams!

[-] freeman@feddit.org 21 points 7 hours ago

lets take that as a challenge!

[-] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 hours ago

All because they throw it into b2b with teams and ado and windows and whatever other shit they call software.

[-] tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago

context?? sounds desperate

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

47539 readers
153 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS