155
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

I'm convinced Chuck is gonna retire and they will clear the field for her to take his seat, in exchange for a pledge to not run for President and interfere with Gavin's coronation. He's the Next One Up, after all....

Maybe after a term or three in the Senate the old misogynists will have died off and a Presidential candidate with a vagina can get elected.

[-] GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 weeks ago

Take the deal and then run anyway.

[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This so much! They actual left needs to start playing dirty because we’re fighting two fronts, the actual fascists and the embedded institutions of neoliberal status quo

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Schumer isn't up for reelection until 2028, so that wouldn't really work. She would need to pick one or the other, she can't run for both simultaneously.

[-] bamboo 1 points 3 weeks ago

You can't hold both positions at the same time, but I think being on the ballot for multiple positions varies from state to state, not sure how it is in NY?

in 2008, Biden was running for VP and for his Senate seat, winning both. He was sworn in as Senator and then resigned like a week later before being sworn in as VP.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Right, but if the plan is for her to convince the Democrats to clear the senate primary field gor her, then run for president anyway...well, they're probably figure out she lied when she announces her presidential run, and i bet they'll find some centrists to run for Schumer's seat. If she wrre taking Schumer's seat this cycle, she could then lie about not seeking the presidency and run in two years, but that's not the timeline.

[-] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

That's a bad deal. Fuck Gavin

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I will never again hold my nose to vote. I think many progressives agree with me.

[-] homes@piefed.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She should take it, renege, and then have Mamdani take her Senate seat when she takes President. Give those DNC shitbags a real one-two punch, lol.

Watch Hakeem Jefferies‘s eyeballs pop literally right the fuck out of his head, ha ha ha ha

[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

I would like her to beat Schumer on merit though, just for the message it'll send to the incumbent democrats who have sat on their ass for the last 3 administrations.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Schumer has appeared so weak and ineffectual these last two years that I don't think he has a shot against any challenger, progressive or otherwise. Seriously, I'm pretty sure Cuomo or Adams could knock him out of that seat. Any honest advisor would probably tell him to not seek leadership again and retire at the end of his term so he can spare himself an embarrassing defeat.

[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Good luck convincing any of those old fucks to step down. If they could only communicate through beeps they would still claim they can do the job of governing

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
155 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30432 readers
2605 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS