259
submitted 1 week ago by Valuy@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 149 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Vance is an idiot. But on this point he is right. And that is by design of leading Republicans and Rupert Murdoch, that set out on a plan to achieve exactly this. That a Watergate situation should never destroy a Republican President again.
And it worked already under Reagan.

[-] left_is_best@feddit.online 40 points 1 week ago

Rupert Murdoch's Fox News, headed at its founding by former Nixon advisor, Roger Ailes, who in 1970 participated in the development of this memo:

https://theintercept.com/document/a-plan-for-putting-the-gop-on-the-news/

All those notes are written in Ailes' hand.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The thinking is done for you.

Like WTF? Republicans have been training sheep all along, it's not just a saying, it's literally true!!

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

considering most of the voters very low info, and dont even follow up on gop politics, as how it affects thier state, economy thier laws,,,etc, except to vote for this one issue, that makes sense.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Yup. Ronnie Raygun had the most criminal administration in history - at least up until Donvict's anyway - by objective measures.

And then topped all of that criminality with Iran/Contra.

Also, I have no idea how the October Surprise theory was ever considered "absurd" by serious adults: https://jacobin.com/2023/03/ronald-reagan-jimmy-carter-1980-election-october-surprise-iran-hostage-conspiracy-theory

And I'm sure their schemes did something to blunt what was arguably much, much worse than Watergate. Another part might simply be that boomers had less fire in their bellies at that point and were flipping over to yuppiedom.

Most narratives today only mention Watergate, and forget about Iran/Contra. I would not be surprised if most of Gen Y and younger are not even aware of Iran/Contra, which is a shockingly brazen crime.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I have no idea how the October Surprise theory was ever considered “absurd”

Disgusting, typical scumbag republican move. 🤢

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't even think he's an idiot.

Evil? Oh hell yes. But 95% of the time he is just saying stupid shit that inbred MAGAs want to hear, or that will make old guard Democrats stammer and guffaw at... (which is the desired effect, they just look privileged and haughty and holier than thou when they do that).

The funny part is when they think he believes in anything other than how smart and cool he is.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Except that he's arguing that it wasn't news worthy, and the "deep state" made a big deal out of nothing to destroy Nixon's presidency.

In other words, don't believe your lying eyes.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

they learned from the watergate instance, and was working OT for the past 40+years of removing that stigma. REAGAN AND then fox/limbaugh was the final straw.

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 59 points 1 week ago

It's like the power level creep in Dragon Ball Z with corruption instead of fighting strength. Watergate is some Raditz shit but we're dealing with Cell and have Majin Buu on the horizon.

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Does that make W. Frieza? That's kinda fitting actually.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Cheney is Guldo.

... similar headshapes.

[-] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 week ago

So… we just need to find out who Trunks is and then make sure he gets killed in front of whoever Gohan is by the GOP?

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago

He's right. And that statement is a huge indictment of both his party and the propaganda it spreads. He's just too stupid to realize it.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

He's gloating at the effectiveness of the propaganda.

[-] massacre@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Its by design. Fox 'News' was borne out of the shame of Nixon's resignation and the desire for an all powerful executive. They hate the American Republic and democracy in general. It's also when the right started the southern strategy in earnest to coopt the religious and then moved to lock in SCOTUS. The strategy sadly was telegraphed for decades and dems didn't take it seriously or rather the took money to look the other way. And here we are today with possibly the worst set of GOP leaders history has produced led by the worst President of all time tearing the US apart.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep.

Then also throw in the destruction of the Fairness Doctrine, and in 10 or so years, AM radio is now full of bombastic asshole hypocrite white guys, all charity cases sponsored by usually mostly the oil lobby, paid to be propogandists.

'Corporate money is free speech' was the absolute death knell, the point of no return.

The longterm Republican strategy has been to destroy public education and replace it with their own forms of education and general public facing 'information'.

Because they know idiots are easier to lie to and emotionally manipulate... because they actually hate democracy, and know that democracy cannot work with a stupid, angry, short tempered public.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

the point of no return.

As long as we're not all dead, there's no such thing.

This unfortunately, truth nuke, we need to bring back the fairness doctrine and create legislation called the truth and honesty doctrine

[-] prole 1 points 1 week ago

the shame of

Gonna have to stop you there...

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's not stupid.

If anything, he's gloating.

"... and what are you gonna do about that?"

Nothing. JD is a 4chan shit poster with a Yale degree and pretty high competency at whipping basically the Asmongold fandom into being gungho for MAGA, that's why he is VP, its a reward for being such a good Republican/Trumper online psyop commander.

He, extremely intentionally, helped build the media environment he is here commenting on.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 week ago

VANce is there to do THiels bidding, once thiels bounces fromt he usa to argentina, i suspect he will lose influence pretty quick.

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I mean Vance was definitely groomed and created by Thiel, but its possible he'll develop his own set of goals and strategies at some point.

Its also possible you're correct, that he'll become irrelevant should he not develop his own independent sensd of political savvy, or maybe due to basically him getting particularly savagely scapegoated and clusterfucked, if that ends up being more beneficial to more people in his milieu.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

LOL, he's telling on himself and the cons.

The Faux News scheme and unleashing hate radio were both done to try to prevent any future consequences for Republican crimes like Watergate. Of course, the Internet further fragmented things.

Of course, the "legacy media" corporate media was already far too right wing anyway, but the zone got flooded with radically far right wing propaganda masquerading as news.

Surely "JD" "Vance" knows this.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

its given how much even the non-right wing news are just issuing copaganda, militaryganda itself. like how cnn has consistently reminding people of "the troops that died" near the end of the news segment everytime. this was before 2016.

[-] prole 2 points 1 week ago

CNN is center-right, at best.

The fact that Fox News has successfully brainwashed the right into believing milquetoast outlets like CNN and MSNBC are actually far left propaganda outlets has done so much to shift the Overton Window to the right, and has poisoned all public discourse.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

This. There is a reason that Chomsky usually puts scare quotes around "liberal media".

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

He's right but not for any of the right reasons.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

Yes and that's catastrophic to America

[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago

To promote his new book Communion. From atheist to Catholic...

Didn't he tell the pope to shut up

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 17 points 1 week ago

JD Vance also had a hand in killing Pope Francis.

[-] Nukola@feddit.it 25 points 1 week ago

You can just look at what happened after the Epstein files were released. If it had happened in the 70s, there would have been mass upleavals. Today? Disgruntled people moaning on the internet. Nothing much.

[-] DrSoap@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

How would you recommend getting a public response like we had in the 70s?

[-] Nukola@feddit.it 1 points 6 days ago

I know it's not something that I should say but t€Rr0r1s|/|, $T3@l1nG from th0se in pow3r and u||10nizing in work|)laces are the only real answers. Find strenght in numbers, they can't k1Ll everybody (at least not directly). Those are the only things that will work. Good luck tho doing it in our current mass s|_|rveillance social system.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

We didn't really have a public response the politicians were just scared that we would. They aren't scared anymore

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

Okay, for how many weeks has Epstein been a story? Just to estimate how much worse it is compared to Watergate.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

You lost me at JD Vance says.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

How about "Couch fucker fills in correct bubbles on multiple choice test occasionally". Top post pretty much covers it.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah and there's so much corruption that we're numb to it

So that is what the rest of the headline says.

[-] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

How long would the story of him fucking a couch last?

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe on Fox "News". Which says more about Fox "News" than about today.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
259 points (100.0% liked)

News

38235 readers
1621 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS