271
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I used to work Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, Friday. I liked that a lot more than a three day weekend.

[-] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 57 points 4 days ago

while your productivity is more important to the owner class than your well being (which dead last on their list of priorities), it still isn't as important as your obedience and abject submissiveness. they just don't care if you would do better work if there were less of it. they'd rather you be too stressed and exhausted to think about pursuing other jobs, let alone have any time for it

[-] SouthEndSunset@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 days ago

Of course they care about my well being …there are posters like everywhere telling me that they do.

[-] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 19 points 4 days ago

If only you could sue your employer for false advertising.

[-] uriel238 15 points 4 days ago
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 4 days ago

I do a three day work week. I still show up for 5 days though.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah I'd say I Lemmy for about 16 hours a week

[-] antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 days ago

It’s so far past time we need to be looking at a 24 hour work week. It’s perfect for multiple reasons. It’s one day. It can be met multiple ways: two 12 hour shifts, three 8 hour shifts, or four 6 hour shifts. It reduces the work week to less than half of the week, so parents can juggle without paying childcare. And the most important reason: we’ll all get the same amount of work done. Corporations or businesses can just swap employees out to get a full week.

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

Corporations or businesses can just swap employees out to get a full week.

That's the part that confuses me the most. Politicians should be all over this! Think how employment would shoot up.

[-] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago

Well, why not. In my country 40% of the workforce works 32 hours or less. It's not always financially attractive to work full time, for instance if you have children at home you can combine part time work with your partner and avoid paying high childcare bills.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 17 points 4 days ago

If only people voted for it instead of "bUt BuT mIgRaNtS 😭😭😭". But the majority is too easily controlled by the wealthy...

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

you can't vote you way into civil rights.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 4 days ago

In most places there's no four day workweek party. That's half the reason Western countries are in this mess.

[-] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 13 points 4 days ago

All those technical advances yet the workload ever increases.

[-] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 3 points 4 days ago

!remindme 30 years

[-] tio_bira@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

On Brazil we are fighting to get a week with four-day workweek, but a man can only dream...

[-] WhatISawInTheForest@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Yes, but then they'll only pay you for 4 days...and you'll probably lose any benefits you had...and things will continue to get more expensive.

[-] uriel238 4 points 4 days ago

The four-day work week movement presumes that wages will increase so that life remains affordable. Mind you this was before the current era in which life isn't affordable on a forty-hour workweek.

Hopefully, when we collectively decide we've had enough, we'll expand our distaste of slavery to cover all forms of bonded servitude.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
271 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

16681 readers
1150 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS