157
What the fuck is it with this guy that women seem to fawn over him?
Or is it just extreme mental illness on their part?
Actually now I've written it out....
Choosing to be an old pedophile's cum rag would be sad if it wasn't so disgusting
didn't we crucify Clinton for shit less obvious than this?
Not just Clinton, Trump gets a free pass or at best a slap on the wrist for shit that others would go to prison for.
they call him teflon don
because if you bring him above 260C(500F) he starts degrading and emitting volatile organic compounds
Nothing to back this up but I assume she is some type of foreign asset. Not that they would really need to much to influence him but a pretty blonde lady is absolutely the winning move.
I don't get it, what's suspicious about a skinny 34-year-old blonde wanting to spend all her time around an 80-year-old diaper-smelling man-child who has literally nothing valuable about his life or personality except his fleeting grasp of unearned power and money?
YEA! just let people love eachother man! freelove! They're all consenting adults, age gaps a commie liberul myth, amirite? It's not illegal so there's nothing wrong about a rich man having a gf who happens to be 50 years younger than them. That's just called capitalism in action. Free love and free markets, amirite brothers?
Imagine how low you must value yourself to sign up for that gig....
What's it pay though?
Idk, as a foreign asset... Look, you'd be the ultimate bootlicker, but if you were fully bought into your nation as a project, sucking off one shit-crusted diaper dick to bend a global superpower to your whims is not a bad deal.
Natalie Harp honest to God sounds like a fake name a foreign asset would have. For real.
For sure
Not a cult, by the way. The rest of us are deranged.
She looks like Ivanka, possibly a handler of some billionaire and/or foreign power?
I bet she is handling something
His diaper?
"Private spaces", like inside his diaper?
🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
Maggie Haberman could have made a little less by being a reporter-whistleblower-hero, but that would have been risking her skin and bank account balance, rather than growing that balance.
Didn’t work for firecracker and won’t work for her
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
157 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30165 readers
2581 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS