454
"Ok, don't do it again. We really, really mean it this time."
In a sternly written letter
That's it !?!
At least it wasn't just a warning, there was a fine attached, but that's like fining your average middle class person like 25 cents.
"would the defendant please put a quarter in the contempt jar"
Only if I could go out and ask my friends and family for the money so I didn't actually have to pay the $0.25.
Imagine if you got $5,000 every time Trump said something stupid.
How to solve world’s hunger in two easy steps; make the rich pay every time they say something stupid. The second step is the hardest; actually collect the money.
I wouldn't mind for all the fuck twits I have to listen to repeat his stupidity for the last decade
A lot of complaining on here about the size of the fine or the fact that Trump isn't in jail yet, or disparate legal treatment for rich people. Let's think through the implications of putting Donald Trump in jail for this, of all things. If he gets put in jail prior to his trial, I think it'd be better for all of us, and for keeping him in jail, if it happens due to him willfully or maliciously violating a gag order rather than due to an oversight or incompetence among his staff. It's coming y'all, be patient.
I see the fine as both a warning and a lure for Trump. The court will step up the punishments, of that I am sure. And they started with a, for him, neglectable fine. He and his fanboys might laugh about this, but it could easily lead to prison for the next time he's fined - he now had ample warning from the court that he will be punished, and the next time it will be a repeat offence.
If his staff is incompetent he should hire the best and the brightest, or do the work himself.
He can no longer afford the best and brightest, and they’re too smart to accept “trust me, bro” as a guarantee of payment. Additionally, he’s not used to doing things himself; he’s used to having underlings do things for him.
The only people who will work for him now are sycophants and/or people who are motivated by some sort of personal gain. In other words, he’s surrounded by incompetent, greedy losers. Heh heh heh.
What? Donald Trump doesn't know how to operate a website, and few competent people are willing to work for him. None of this changes my argument that if a former president is put in jail, let's have it be because he did something willfull or malicious
Donald Trump doesn’t know how to operate a website
"Someone told me I need pipes for the website. We need to get the best pipes. Do they come in gold plate?"
If they're avoiding this hard to put him in jail what makes you think he'll ever get a guilty verdict. All this dancing around makes me believe he'll never be convicted, or at most it will be a slap on the wrist.
How are they "avoiding hard," in this instance?
$5000 is a typical fine for first-time violation of a gag order. They are neither avoiding putting him in jail nor eager to put him in jail.
Aaaaaaaany day now.
$5,000? Wow, really bringing out the big guns here aren't we. That'll show him, I'm sure!
Another nickel, just a cost of doing business.
I'm pessimistic enough to think this is an example of what his punishment will be for just about all his crimes.
Is the judge Gary Bettman?
this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
454 points (100.0% liked)
News
23296 readers
2953 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS