210
Instead it'll be the America First party led by Fuentes. All the bigotry, just more inclusive cause they hate Israel and Jews as well.
Another redcoat putting on a blue sweater.
I don't believe him.
Maybe start a TuckerTeabag Party and invite Marge?
Siphon off just enough a percentage of Republicans to break and stall the conservative "project" for many decades.
Please?
As an aussie please call it tuckerbag.
I wish he'd no longer convert oxygen to carbon dioxide
It would be nice if he'd convert CO2 to, potentially, 1 cadaver
Doubt
Sadly, this is more likely to finally get us a third party than anything else.
So, moving on to some other subset of gullible fools to grift? Probably Libertarians.
Soooo…the nazi party then?
Hundred bucks says he runs under a new far right label
The Pumpernickel Party
Either that or Libertarian
Libertarian is a poison label. It’ll be Christian nationalist shmibertarian or something.
I'm not sure the Libertarians want xtian nationalists.
Maybe Tucker joins up with the Constitution Party or starts some new thing.
Who gives a fuck about this idiot.
Sad, lonely dudes who don't fuck.
They have no fucks to give, but if they did, it would be to Tucker.
I'm sorry, Tucker. Your bullshit helped us get into the mess we're in. You can't slither your way away from the cesspool of society that you've built up and groomed for 7 years on Faux News.
He also probably just believes in a different set of terrible values than MAGA.
All the MAGA grifters are trying to distance themself from the fuck show of MAGA.
Yup.
The MAGAsphere's ability to make money off stupid people is nearing an end. They're looking for the next grift.
ability to make money off stupid people is nearing an end
I figure that is an evergreen thing. No shortage of stupid people and that's probably why someone like Donvict ran as a Republican - they tend to concentrate in the right wing.
*cesspool
Thanks. Corrected.
He's the heir of a multi-national company, he's ~~CIA trained~~sorry totally not CIA trained, and has more political and business connections than Trump.
It's 50/50 whether or not he's the next president or he fronts the next major conservative movement in general that finalizes the nail in the coffin that is the US empire.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Honestly I'm happy to hear this. My dad watches his show and as much as he denies it, tends to parrot whatever carlson says. I guess we'll see if his audienceship survives the changing political party
Is there any chance that the Republican party will shift away from MAGA and toward Tucker?
Probably. IME the average low info conservative voter blindly trusts their favorite propagandists, so I think it's very meaningful and good when those propagandists try to jump off the sinking ship. Not in the sense that I suddenly trust them or think they're good people, but I'm also not so high on my own moral purity that I'm going to reject it or pretend it doesn't benefit me and my worldview.
I don't think that many people here give a shit what he does. He's never been any kind of friend to you or me, and forgive me if I don't think he's starting now. He's probably just looking for a new angle to cause division in working class people. That has always been his moral free hobby and paycheck.
Tucker isn’t on anyone’s side but Tucker’s. If he does damage against maga and the GOP I’ll be happy he did but he can still go eat a tire
I bet the Republican Party isn’t racist enough for him
load more comments
(1 replies)
This opportunistic shill would sell his kids to the butcher if it meant he could get a few more minutes of attention.
He will backtrack as soon as its in his own intrest.
Neither democrats nor republicans really give a fuck
Cool but he’s still a low life piece of shit
Tucker Carlson says he’ll no longer support the Republican Party.
And I support legislation to secure the taxpayer-funded regulatory framework that implements the weekly maintenance required to keep Tucker Carlson’s facial butthole superglued shut.
Both of these statements have equal value.
EDIT: After careful reflection, I have come to the conclusion that while both statements are stupid, mine is significantly better.
Sure, why not. You've already done the damage...
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
210 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30165 readers
2543 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS