411
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] irdc@derp.foo 155 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a bad look for Apple: it shows that there's basically no editorial independence at Apple TV, something that has been a well-established feature at for-profit newspapers and television channels for decades. This clearly demonstrates that Apple TV cannot be trusted when it comes to serious news.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 year ago

Editorial independence a well established feature of for profit media? The fuck you smoking?

[-] irdc@derp.foo 41 points 1 year ago

I don't need to smoke anything, I simply live in the EU where this is commonplace.

[-] irdc@derp.foo 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't worry, with media independence being an area of concern for the EU, and with the Digital Services Act in the process of being enacted, we'll no doubt soon Brussels-effect your biggest media providers into compliance. The rest will follow soon thereafter.

[-] Contend6248@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Holy, even here in europe you can't bite the hand that feeds you.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“According to The Hollywood Reporter, ahead of its decision to end The Problem, Apple approached Stewart directly and expressed its need for the host and his team to be “aligned” with the company’s views on topics discussed. Rather than falling in line when Apple threatened to cancel the show, Stewart reportedly decided to walk.”

The least surprising thing possible to any Jon Stewart fan.

I can’t wait to see him on the late night shows.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can’t imagine any manager who’s dense enough not to know what Stewart’s reaction would be to that sort of line, and whoever suggested a meeting about it should be ashamed.

The day he runs for president (and wins) will be a day that people full of bullshit will remember as the beginning of the end…

[-] CylonBunny@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

This is disappointing of Apple. You hire someone like Jon Stewart and you have to expect him to do hard hitting journalism! Apple is one of the biggest companies in the whole world, they can afford to support their journalists. I’m sure HBO has gone to bat for John Oliver for worse.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

They have their mouths full of winnie the pooh’s cock, and at this point they dont care about anything else.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they already monitor your imessages and if they are critical of china they snitch to the local confucius institute.

[-] MudMan@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

I am very neutral on this in general. Honestly, Stewart does not need Apple at this point pretty much at all.

But man, to have been a fly on the wall in that meeting. I've seen Stewart's "disappointed in you and not particularly worried about it" face and it's weapons grade old dad disappointment. There were definitely sweaty outlines on many of those chairs by the end of it.

[-] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Canceling Apple TV over this, knew they were spineless, but this is pathetic since it’s one of the few shows I watch on it. Growing really tired of all these service subscriptions as it is.

[-] Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

I’ll do you one better - I’m going to pirate every apple show I watch just do they don’t get my money.

I refer to this tactic by its official name: “How I watch everything already.” 🏴‍☠️

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Thank god it was cancelled… people would have discovered that china uses ai for controlling their citizens (and possibly others). Something that is totally not known to anyone

[-] sab@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

I appreciate that this is a forum for Apple enthusiasts, but as someone who is not particularly enthusiastic about any big tech company but loves Jon Stewart, I consider this good news. Hopefully he'll keep it going somewhere else.

[-] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

First episode on the new network - The Problem With Apple

[-] LifeOfChance@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You know he's gonna talk about it soon

[-] bamboo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Apple also makes original content for Apple News+, they have some podcasts. I wonder if their original work there is subject to the same policy. If so, that really undermines their credibility as a news source.

[-] jungle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah no shit. Who would have thought that a phone making company wouldn't be beholden to the highest journalistic standards.

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 11 points 1 year ago

Honestly, I don't get why he didn't just go on YouTube full episodes instead of apple. I would love to watch his show, but I don't want to pay apple a subscription.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Because Google didn't offer him a contract

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 1 year ago

Why does he need a contract. He can just make a YouTube channel and start making money from ad revenue (I know it's not much), sponsors, patreon, memberships and so on.

[-] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

That would not be sustainable long term for this type of show, he's not a single youtube content creator with maybe 1-3 editors, he has a buttload of staff who presumably get paid professional wages and his team uses a buttload of expensive professional equipment and has to do a buttload of expensive legwork and research and so on.

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 5 points 1 year ago

You mean like Linus media group and other big YouTube channels? Those, too, have buttload of whatever you mentioned. Anyway, I'll stop here. I really hate arguing online.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

LMG has slowly built up their YouTube audience over many years and grew their revenue along with it, you couldn’t just plop down an unknown Linus Media Group cold onto YouTube today and succeed. In addition to that Linus Media Group relies on a metric shit-ton of short and long form content output, which isn’t the format of what is essentially a talk show.

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 1 year ago

Stewart is already a very well known dude and he can build his audience in a very short time. Linus started from zero. Jon is starting from 1000. He won't need to build anything. He'll only a couple of social media posts and he'll have millions of subs. Anyway, this is moot. He will still do his own thing. He doesn't even know who I am anyway. Lol

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Moving an audience between two internet platforms isn’t as easy as you think, much less moving between TV and internet.

And that still wouldn’t solve the whole issue of YouTube not being designed around TV show long-form content. You can’t just lift and shift a talk show to YouTube and expect it to make the same money. The volume of content LMG has to put out on a daily basis is nuts. They’re constantly working on on a dozen project at once, need multiple hosts, and even multiple channels with themed content.

You’re comparing apples and oranges don’t seem to understand the glaring differences between these two things lol.

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He needs a contract to make money. Putting his episodes on YouTube without being paid to do it would benefit Google.

The message he’s sending is: “if you want my show, pay me”.

The $250 he would earn with Adsense on YouTube is irrelevant.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You answered your own question. Not having to deal with all those different revenue streams is worth something and I'm sure Apple offered him more than he'd get that way, too

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 1 year ago

Millions of creators are "dealing" with them just fine. Not sure what so hard about setting up a patreon account or coordinating with sponsors. Pretty sure it is much easier than dealing with a multi-trillion dollar corporation. It just feels wrong he's putting his voice behind a paywall where many people could just benefit from it if it were on YouTube.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Millions of actors get by performing in local theaters but George Clooney probably wouldn't take that gig. Jon Stewart is not on the same level as YouTubers. I can't imagine he'd even make half of his contract on YouTube

It just feels wrong he's putting his voice behind a paywall where many people could just benefit from it if it were on YouTube.

I get what you mean here and agree with the sentiment. I just can't blame him for taking the significantly better deal

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 1 year ago

I am by no means hating on the man. I love his work and admire his courage to face assholes and call them out on their bullshit. Hence I want to be able to see his episodes on YouTube. And I do understand he needs to get paid. I'm just stating my point of view, no hate or judgement. Not everyone can afford subscription/wants a subscription through a huge corporation. Many, many people would be more than happy to pay the creators directly. I do. I don't want this to spiral into an argument.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hey now we're not arguing here! I wholly agree with your reasoning, I was just explaining why he'd take a paywalled Apple deal over ads and patreon. I don't subscribe to any streaming services myself

[-] penquin@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 1 year ago

Ok good then. I really hate arguing with strangers on the internet shake hands

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Because they can't get actual content deals.

YouTube videos are a terrible source of revenue.

[-] mancy@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Just cancelled Apple TV+ 🙂

[-] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 4 points 1 year ago
[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

already in the news: Apple is dumping China as fast as they can without majorly impacting their products. Manufacturing switching to other countries already.

Damn. I would really like to see his commentary on everything going on now.

[-] Yerbouti@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Apple doesn't give a shit about democracy, who would have thought?

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2023
411 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

17472 readers
29 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS