669
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 days ago

Nice try, I ain't gonna pay anyway

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 8 points 3 days ago

Exactly, I just keep using the free plan and when I finish the amount for the day I just switch to another service

[-] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

This is why IMO blitz scaling is dumb when your service is a commodity. I'm not any more loyal to Uber than Skip. If more investor money goes into making a cheaper meal or ride on Skip I use that. Consumers are mercenaries about that stuff.

The "blitz" part of blitz scaling assumes your customers can't move.

[-] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 159 points 4 days ago

Of course it is, it’s essentially a scam. They just need enough humans to keep investing until they check out and run with a bailout.

[-] DeckPacker@piefed.social 57 points 4 days ago

Funny thing is, the US government doesn't even have nearly enough money to bail all these mfa out. So we are heading into uncharted territory here

[-] OberonSwanson@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 days ago

Of course they don’t, that’s why they’re building bunkers. Thinking it’ll slow us down, as we’ll open their bunkers like cans of tuna. A bunker only works for so long, then the survivors start hunting for them like delicious shipwrecks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago

And that's why they're trying underhanded tactics to inflate earnings and IPO directly into the index funds, so every American's 401K will legally have to rebalance and invest in them. They're racing to fleece retirement funds before the bubble bursts.

Not financial advice, of course :p but people should really consider getting their stuff out and into self-directed funds or whatever it is US people do to not depend on auto-allocated funds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Yliaster@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

I don't get why companies get to legally bailout like this. Why do people have to suffer for their bullshit? Enslave the CEOs if you have to make things right, leave the people out of it.

[-] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 13 points 4 days ago

That's simple, because the people making laws and overseeing the adherence to those laws are great buddies with those same CEOs.

So, corruption.

Though i do agree with you, there is no such thing as too big to fail. Government shouldn't have any handouts to corporations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 3 days ago

I mean, this is no different than Walmart making prices low until other businesses die out and then raising them.

It is no different than police shoving all the homeless people and drug addicts into one area of town to crash the property prices, and then evicting them once developers buy everything for cheap.

They're purposely operating at a loss in the expectation that they can get ingrained into a ton of workflows, and then gouge everyone absolutely to death while also worsening the quality of the service to make it cheaper for them to run.

If it weren't so horrible for the environment, I'd kind of like it, because all the dumbass executives that are signing up for this are going to get exactly what they deserve. You'd think they'd recognize a scheme when they see one.

[-] fishy@lemmy.today 18 points 3 days ago

My CEO (whom I don't consider a particularly good or bad CEO) spent a day playing with AI then when asked if he'd sign the company up with the service he literally laughed in their faces and said it's useless. I was honestly shocked because he's totally into buzzword and popular crap. Gained a lot of respect for him that day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 86 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

reminder than during 2019 there were streaming services popping left and right, all showing tremendous growth because they started from zero, and articles were about how bad Netflix was doing due to having practically no growth compared with the competition (they already had a massive subscriber base). Twist? Netflix was the only streaming service that was actually making a profit, the rest were a massive loss but big growth.

Needless to say most of those streaming services died; who remembers DC streaming service, or Yahoo's? While Netflix is basically as stong as ever, despite the prevalent enshitification happening through the whole industry.

Point of the story? shareholders don't care about stable profitable business, only cancerous growth. AI is like that, zero profits, ton of cost, but as long as they show growth the shareholders are happy, regardless of how cooked the books are.

[-] MimicJar@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

2019 Yahoo

My immediate thought, there is no way Yahoo! Screen survived into 2019.

I looked it up and Yahoo! Screen (which featured Community season 6) was shutdown in January 2016. But Yahoo! View launched in late 2016 (as a Hulu-like replacement), and that did shutter in mid 2019.

So Yahoo! was already dead, but it also died for real in 2019.

Imagine having a streaming service so bad it fails twice

[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Isn't that kind of Yahoo!'s business model?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago

I love that nobody watched anything on Yahoo! Screen except for that one season of Community

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Trust me bro we're so close to profitability bro, just need this IPO to secure funding one last time bro then we'll be profitable bro I swear.

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I can't imagine paying for AI when the open source tools have made it so easy to set up a model locally.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 17 points 3 days ago

Don't be daft. The vast majority of people don't have the knowledge or resources to set that up locally.

[-] nullspace@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

You're right if we're talking about the entire population of Earth. With these local models though, other people have already done all the hard stuff. Anyone with an RTX card and just a minimum level of patience can get going.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Minimum for local models is 12gb imo. There are several "rtx" cards that have 8gb. Also, why nvidia? AMD works well too. My previous point stands, still. If you don't already have the hw, buying a pc today is very expensive. I don't know if you go out much but it ain't pretty out there. People arrn't precisely swimming in cash.

Also, patience isn't the only requirement. Keep in mind that some people struggle to even install a program.

[-] Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz 38 points 4 days ago

Honestly Google is likely to beat openAI and Anthropic as things are.

OpenAI and Anthropic have to buy/rent their hardware from Nvidia, while Google is making their own TPU hardware. Google's hardware costs on AI is way lower, every dollar they spend on it goes a lot farther.

And unlike the other two, they're already a profitable company. They're making record profits right now. They don't have a desperate need to figure out how to make back billions on their AI models, they can just keep offering Gemini at a comparatively cheap price and wait for anthropic and open AI to bankrupt themselves.

[-] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 10 points 4 days ago

I really really really don't want evil corporation Google to dominate even more.

I prefer plailny greedy corporations over evil ones

[-] ChromaticMan@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

OpenAI and Anthropic aren’t less evil than Google.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WPSteam@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

AI Bubble burst coming sooner?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago
[-] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Now, I'm no MBA, but that seems like a bad business plan...

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 4 days ago

It's gonna come crashing down pretty soon. It's gonna hurt all of us. It won't hurt the people responsible nearly enough.

[-] bort@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

pretty soon

people have been saying that for some time though

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Only because the hype has lasted longer than expected. Now that IPOs have been filed, the AI companies (Anthropic, OpenAI) released statements about slowing down to protect us. They're setting the stage for lower growth. But I think you should invest every penny you have into "SpaceXMegaTwitterSuperCarAI".

[-] SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

The bubble will pop, I think a lot of people are just baffled by how big it's getting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 49 points 4 days ago

they are spending infinite money for every $1 i pay them

[-] dgriffith@aussie.zone 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm quite happy to use their compute power for frivolous bullshit if it hastens their enshittification and demise.

"Hey Claude, can you begin work on an e-commerce site written in visual basic?"

*Two microseconds later... *

"Your free usage limit has been reached"

"Ok Claude see you tomorrow, maybe we'll think about a rewrite in Turbo Pascal"

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago

Good thing I don't personally pay them anything

[-] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Oh, you are going to pay. The bubble is going to fuck us all quite thoroughly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] adarza@piefed.ca 31 points 4 days ago

so these crazy prices i hear about being implemented (like at github) should actually be at least 10x higher?

[-] Catoblepas 31 points 4 days ago

10x higher to break even :)

[-] megopie 15 points 4 days ago

To break even on operating expenses, not even counting debt payments, depreciated capital value, or future recapitalization costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Oh come on bubble, why won't you crash already?

[-] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 days ago

Definition of a Bubble. These AI huckster keep stringing investors on though. Sadly, I think these public IPOs coming up for Space X, OpenAI, and Anthropic will fall short of expectation and trigger the bubble popping.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 14 points 4 days ago

How much do they spend when I pay nothing?

load more comments (3 replies)

My first use of Claude this week, for code reviews only(since no LLM can be trusted to write a user story or test suite), had it gaslight me.

It marked down my code for using a specific practice to make some xml safer and easier to read.

When I tried things its way, it wanted me to change it back.

[-] Crylos@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

I use it a lot, and if you are getting these kinds of results you are either trolling, or just flat out not providing the details and guardrails required with your prompts.

I’ve been in software for decades, and if used correctly, yes it can accelerate velocity of building code out. 10x? No.. if you are lucky and careful perhaps 2-4x.

As ALWAYS the human should be in the loop and is on the hook for any code generated.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] captain_solanum@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

looks inside

But if you use the $100 a month Claude Max plan, and you would use it to the weekly limit by going full ‘agentic coding’ (so almost no human in the loop) you would use an amount of tokens that would cost you more than $1000 at API-pricing.

If I watch 600 movies every day on my netflix subscription I am using more energy than I pay them for. Obviously everyone is like me. Therefore they are losing money overall.

Wait, their (netflix) earnings say they made a profit last quarter. But my calculations were waterproof!

Probably anthropic are not net positive, but they are not spending 10x what people pay them for tokens.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 13 points 4 days ago

Good thing all the companies leaning hard on AI 10 X'd their profits... Wait...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
669 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85333 readers
3914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS