192
submitted 17 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Historians and campaigners accuse US defence secretary of desecrating memory of soldiers who fell in Normandy

The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has been accused by historians and rights campaigners of “grotesque stupidity” and desecrating the memory of the soldiers who stormed the beaches of Normandy after he sought to link immigration to the D-day anniversary, saying Europe was facing a different “invasion” of its shores.

Speaking in north-west France on Saturday to mark the 82nd anniversary of the D-day landings, Hegseth seized on the moment marking the wartime liberation of Europe to reiterate the US administration’s longstanding attack on European immigration policies.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

The last time Nazis were in Normandy, they didn't give speeches.

[-] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 36 points 16 hours ago

He can fuck right off

—daughter of a WWII combat veteran

[-] lumpyluggage@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Same

— grand son of a nazi

[-] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 12 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Live footage of what the response was after he finished talking:

BS71cf51qzl2LLT.gif

[-] cloudless@kbin.earth 17 points 17 hours ago

The best part of Hegseth’s appearances is his unshakable overconfidence. He truly stands behind every dumb utterance he makes like it is gospel.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago

Is he the "I never wash my hands" guy? Or was that another Fox talking head?

[-] wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip 18 points 17 hours ago

Hegseth drinks his own piss

[-] expatriado@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

he was told there was a lot of alcohol in his piss

[-] newton@feddit.online 11 points 17 hours ago

Just a piece of garbage

[-] astronaut_sloth@mander.xyz 6 points 16 hours ago

The US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, has been accused by historians and rights campaigners of “grotesque stupidity”

I see they were being kind to him.

I literally don't know a single veteran or service member who either respects him or even just likes him. Literally 100% across the board disdain. There's got to be at least a couple who have positive views of him in the DoD, but no one I've met or worked with...

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
192 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29987 readers
2095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS