423
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Maroon@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

How do you even protect yourself and your kids from this? Maybe I can mask up, but I can't expect my partner or her kids to do the same.

[-] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There are already cameras everywhere. As you walk down the street you're probably on and average of 3 ring cameras at any time. Cars have cameras, stores have lots of cameras (the fake ones you see, and the real hidden ones). There have been pen cameras and tie clip cameras for decades. Glasses cameras aren't really a big step.

[-] Zorg 17 points 2 days ago

Apparently quite a few people are developing ways to defect facial recognition https://www.stratecta.exchange/fashion-that-can-beat-facial-recognition-systems/
I was pleasantly surprised to find out Zenni now offers a near infrared blocking coating for their glasses.

[-] queueBenSis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

are the prices from Capable a joke? who thefuck pays $6-700 for a pair of joggers or sweater. privacy wear should be affordable, not a luxury. it’s the wealthy class that’s making this a problem in the first place

Has Zenni gotten rid of the polarized lenses? I checked a few sunglasses and couldn't configure them with polarized lenses....

[-] Catoblepas 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If you’re wanting to block IR maybe look for a pair that uses the Zenni ID Guard thing? Edit: just double checked and that’s where the option is now.

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

How does this "anti-papparazi" thing work?

[-] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Read the linked article. It goes through a lot methods.

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I did read it but still can't grasp it.

[-] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

reflective particles in the garment nullify flash photography by fucking with the exposure to wash out other elements of the subject

here's an example photo of Trevor Noah wearing one of these scarves without and with flash:

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So it only works with flash on. Not that helpful, then?

[-] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

yes but these are designed to deter a specific type of intrusion from paparazzi, hence their popularity with celebrities. if it was effective at all times, it would be blinding to the naked eye, which would limit its usefulness to most people.

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

If someone were to take a picture of me without flash, the scarf would lose their effect. I believe the glasses won't use flash.

[-] oozynozh@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

if you're looking to evade passive facial detection by smart glasses, a facial covering like a surgical mask is probably the lowest profile solution, followed by those bulky IR-proof glasses like what Reflectacles sells. maybe a combination of both but at some point it becomes conspicuous to have your face covered so fully all the time, not to mention impractical for socialization.

[-] MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Plus I also have to wear actual glasses, and I'd have to use either the IR glasses either my glasses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

This is going to be so illegal in EU

[-] GhostFace@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

I can't get facebook off my phone. I can put the app to sleep but it's always going to be there. It's such an invasion of privacy but I don't know how to deal with it.

[-] potustheplant@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

adb commands

[-] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Some manufacturers mark bundled crap as essential system apps you need root to get rid of, but usually you can disable them which effectively uninstalls it in every other way except it will still take storage space. I wonder if your ROM just used the word "sleep" for that functionality?

[-] spacegoat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Get a different phone

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Can you use ADB to remove the app? Look it up

[-] GhostFace@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

It's not an android so I don't think so.

[-] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

It's not an android and it's not iOS, what operating system are you running?

[-] Crit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 19 hours ago

Huawei maybe? otherwise I don't see how this would be a thing.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 115 points 3 days ago

Only predators buy those glasses.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

I support smart glasses. Not from meta or Google or whatever the fuck.

The more cameras we point at cops and people in power, the better.

The moment an open-source privacy focused set of frames exist, I'm buying it.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

I agree with your premise, but only if it's stored locally and not sent to a corporation, who is likely going to share videos that help to convict other people of crimes but not allow access to video that shows cops doing something wrong.

But also, there should be a legal requirement to have a light visible when recording. If you're found violating this, it should at least be a sizable criminal offense.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It should have to light up when recording. Like, at a hardware level.

Surveillance at critical points like arrests seems important in order to have basic accountability. Surveillance all the time if you know it or not is more of a slippery slope.

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Have a light that beams out from beside the sensor through the same lense, no way to cover it without blocking the camera

Have a visible dot shutter that closes when it's not recording,

Require you to touch the temple on the frame the whole time it's recording.

There are ways

[-] plz1@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Now I envision cops just straight up jacking people's Rx glasses under suspicion of being recorded, like they do with phones already.

load more comments (47 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Youre telling me Meta didnt have this from the start?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
423 points (100.0% liked)

World News

56418 readers
2063 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS