151
submitted 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Delaware is home to more corporations than people. Human people, that is, as under longstanding state law and the US Supreme Court’s infamous 2010 ruling, corporations are people, too.

A judge in Delaware—a state with more registered business entities than people—ruled Monday in favor of a small town that allows corporations to vote in local elections.

Delaware Superior Court Judge Craig Karsnitz ruled that the town of Fenwick Island, population 400, did not violate the state Constitution by permitting business entities—which make up 12% of the town’s “population”—to vote in municipal elections, as case plaintiff the ACLU of Delaware had claimed.

“What is a ‘person?’ When one cuts to the heart of this case, that is the question,” Karsnitz wrote to open his 20-page ruling.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

This is the same craziness sovereign citizens try to pass off in court as legal justification for whatever actions they took, but actually accepted by a just as unhinged judge

[-] pticrix@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Does this mean that a company that outcompetes another into dissolving can be accused of manslaughter?

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 hours ago

If money is speech why can't you pay rent with poem?

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Can I marry a corporation?

[-] ClassStruggle@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago

SCOTUS has sided with businesses regarding personhood since the 14th amendment was passed. Citizens United wasn't an isolated incident.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 47 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This is insane:

“According to the law, a person is anyone or anything that can initiate and be subject to legal proceedings.

This is turning things totally on it's head. Companies are defined as legal persons exactly so they can be sued, and are responsible to the law. Not the other way around.

By this standard a company that doesn't make money should also have the right to social welfare, and when it gets old to receive a pension.

This is absolute madness, and in no way within what it means to be a legal person in any civilized country.
A legal person does not have for instance citizenship, a legal person does not have human rights, and maybe most importantly a legal person cannot go to jail. Only REAL people can do those things.
The reason it's called a "legal" person is exactly because it is not a REAL person, and for instance doesn't have a right to vote, because a legal person is not a citizen.

USA is such a shitty and insane country it's impossible to put into a few words exactly how bad it is.

[-] zonklezoop@lemmy.zip 15 points 7 hours ago

The only thing I appreciated in the article was that the judge said that a fetus wasn't a person.

[-] londos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Clearly the fetus should incorporate

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

Yes, until the next case where it is. 🤡

[-] Stern@lemmy.world 28 points 7 hours ago

So if I start up a thousand businesses in town I can make myself mayor?

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 16 points 6 hours ago

They have to own land according to the ruling. So you also have to sell each of them a square inch off the back of your lot. (I've seen nothing about the land needing to be buildable or habitable). IANAL though

[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 24 points 7 hours ago

This timeline is so stupid it hurts.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Jim Crow laws against working class next Delaware? Unironically the real great replacement theory is just rich fucks signing a stack of forms.

this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
151 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29920 readers
1514 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS