472
submitted 1 year ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

President Joe Biden was asked by a reporter in Israel on Wednesday what made him confident that the Israelis weren't behind the explosion that killed hundreds at a Gaza hospital on Tuesday.

Biden responded that it was "the data I was shown by my Defense Department."

Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded the Gaza hospital blast was likely caused by an errant Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket that fell short of its target.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] freepalestine@monyet.cc 185 points 1 year ago

I just want to respectfully remind everyone that just because this tragedy was likely not perpetrated by Israel, it does not mean they are absolved of any of the hundreds of war crimes they have already committed.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 year ago

They killed multiple journalists earlier this week and killed at least 6 in a strike on a school and this hospital debacle has drowned all of that out.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 45 points 1 year ago

Can we hold hamas (and palestine for giving them a holdout) for their war crimes, or is your logic only one-way?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] snooggums@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Yeah, is there any place in southern Gaza that isn't packed full of the people they told to move there from the north for 'safety'?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Daiken@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago

The problem I have with this narrative isn't who dropped the bomb. Tbh they're probably right it was a Palestinian missile. It's the sheer audacity for all these western countries to be shocked and say let's figure this out, as Israel just dropped like 6000 bombs in 6 days. They're worried about one bomb but not the 6000 others, cause ya know, those were killing only Hamas and not injured people in a hospital /s.

While the Muslim world looks on in horror at more bombing in a conflict that has been going on for decades, the western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people. Only the US can pressure Israel to accept a two state solution. That's the only peaceful solution possible for this conflict imo. The other solution is to wipe out Gaza and the West Bank and everyday we're getting closer to that.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago

A two-state-solution doesn't work in part because extremist Muslim groups want the are to be purely Muslim. They would continue to attack Israel with terror tactics, Like they did from the start. What is your solution to that?

[-] Pogbom@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Swap Muslim with Jewish and Israel with Palestine and it's the same problem... to be clear I think both are true but it's kinda weird to single one out.

[-] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago

I single them out because the extremist Muslim groups on Palestinian side have openly admitted, repeatedly, that the goal ist to exterminate all Jews from the area and make it a pure Muslim country.

If you have some sources that show the same was said from Israeli side about Palestine, please show me. Because what I see in this conflict is not as simple as people like to make it out to be. It's not just evil colonizers trying to snag land from a victim country that wants a two-state-solution.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The western world is focused on insignificant details. Who carried out what attack. Who dropped what bomb. Which act is more morally reprehensible. None of this solves the problem of a displaced people

Misinformation on the scale of "a building was destroyed that clearly is still intact" deserves focus. If they'll lie about shit that can be confirmed with a tiny bit of research, what else is getting exaggerated?

[-] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id 18 points 1 year ago

The reason for the focus is that it was deliberately being used in a disinformation campaign. Were that not the case, I think you're right that it would have faded into the background noise as just one bomb among 6000 others.

load more comments (18 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 95 points 1 year ago
  1. He was asked on the street by a random reporter.

  2. His quote includes "likely"

  3. For the last couple years Bidens off the cuff remarks haven't exactly been reliable.

Yet people are treating this as an official stance of the US Government...

[-] li10@feddit.uk 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ll take what the president says as the stance of the US government, and I don’t think that’s remotely unreasonable…

If he’s making mistakes with off the cuff remarks, then he needs to stop making off the cuff remarks.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] vertigo3pc@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

"Iraq has WMD's" is a similar statement, backed by an entire administration, that also led to unnecessary deaths.

Its a political statement, because if Israel did attack the hospital, then that's another outright war crime right after Israel was threatened by Jordan, Lebanon, and Iran.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Uh, did you miss this part?

Two U.S. officials told ABC News the Pentagon independently concluded

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

The embedded tweet:

While we continue to collect information, our current assessment, based on analysis of overhead imagery, intercepts and open source information, is that Israel is not responsible for the explosion at the hospital in Gaza yesterday.

So the investigation isn't concluded, there might not have even been an official investigation, and all they're saying is Israel "isn't responsible".

None of what OPs headline claims.

[-] iAmTheTot@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

That's a tweet from the white house national security council. That's completely independent of the article's claim that two pentagon officials gave them info.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] nephs@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Pentagon. The security agency of the country vetoing ceasefire agreement in the UN security council, in favour of Israel attacks.

Independently of whom, exactly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

I mean. Fuck both. But fuck Hamas more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] halfempty@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago

I don't consider the Pentagon to be a reliable source for information when they have a vested interest in the conflict. Remember when they said Saddam Hussain had "weapons of mass destruction" which was used to justify the Iraq invasion? Well there never were any. The Pentagon manufactured that disinformation, and media parroted it like loyal puppets.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago

Ah yes. Just like Iraq had WMDs.

Sure is crazy how, of all the places a rocket misfire could have landed, it struck a place guaranteed to be full of people. A baptist hospital, no less, which would definitely drive up religious tensions in the area if it turned out it was bombed by HAMAS. Israel couldn’t have hoped for a more favorable outcome, how fortunate.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Just like Iraq had WMDs.

This line really doesn't mean that much anymore after critics used it to say the claims that Russia was going to invade Ukraine were untrue.

Healthy skepticism is warranted, but let's not use arguments that have become hollow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stamau123@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Israel couldn’t have hoped for a more favorable outcome, how fortunate.

They could have done damage to the hospital proper, that would have been more favorable in this escalation plot you nailed down. Why another escalation is needed after raids are already commencing, I dunno, the plot is just so dastardly. The anti-israel riots after this event are undoubtedly going to be used by Israel to give carte blanche to start striking Gaza! Oh wait, that was already happening. A plan so good it is accomplished before it starts.

Also the density of Gaza would make it more probable than not that hamas/Islamic jihad bombs would land in population dense spots when they land short. You don't hear about the IJ bombs that didn't land in hospital parking lots, and assuming otherwise would be rife with logical fallacies.

All in all these events gave Israel nothing that they didn't already have, and stalled Arab meetings to boot. IJ got a pr coup from uncritical media, and the whole event has been muddied into useless circles.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] moneyinphx@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

And the US’s official statement was that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and we needed to invade. Sure…

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

It was also their official statement that Russia was going to invade Ukraine.

The intelligence agencies actually concluded that Iraq might have weapons of mass destruction. It was the Bush administration that spun it as a certainty and created the lie that they definitely had them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Since this discussion comes again and again and again, here a Crosspost from a similar thread that shows the „morning after“:

So this here is the current view on the area where supposedly about 500 people died. Also there are allegedly more than 300 wounded.

Questions I personally have:

  • where is the rubble and where is the bomb crater?
  • why does the building seem undamaged?
  • how do you fit 800 people in this parking lot?
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiovaMC@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

This reads like: "we investigated ourselves and found we did nothing wrong"...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Zippit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're lying, I mean the US. Nothing new here.

[-] donuts@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago

This is the part where you show the receipts...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

Is Islamic Jihad distinct from Hamas?

Yes, you can usually find it abbreviated as PIJ and supposedly has ties to Iran

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] sndmn@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Colin Powell has entered the chat.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago

The video seems pretty clear tbh. An aircraft dropping bombs would be quite loud, and a missile would be visible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
472 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39142 readers
2224 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS