202
I don't get loyalty to a politician
There are multiple layers of reinforcement - it's tied up in their religion, personal identity, friend groups.
They have doubts but like any cult, when your life is essentially founded on zealous dogma, even if you have a large amount of cognitive dissonance over what you and the cult are doing, you can't reject it because rejecting it means rejecting your family, your friends, and your own identity, and likely also making enemies of everyone who comprises your support group.
It's part of why, as satisfying as it is, I can't really be on board with just telling ex-MAGA "you did this to yourself" and to go eat a penis. All that does is isolate them and make them likelier to relapse into the cult, the only welcoming group available to them.
Might be good for some of them to try eating dick though while they're experimenting with like different stuff
I mean.....I don't see the appeal of saying them trying gay things is a funny joke.
Because here's the thing. If a maga person tried sucking a dick, and realized he really liked it? Ok. That's fine. I wouldn't think less of them for being gay.
I think less of them for supporting and enabling fascist political groups that force their policies on all of us. The kind of politicians that "Don't ever consider the financial situation of their citizens".
I think less of people who support pedophiles. I couldn't care less what genitalia they enjoy in their mouth.
He didn't say suck a dick though. He said eat a dick. I always took eat a dick to be a pejorative regardless of the orientation of the target.
Its not a joke its like they just had to discard like their entire identity to be less evil time to experiment why not try some new shit sexually real recommendation
So many people told me they voted for him the first time because he was a business man, and not a politician....
Uhm, since when the fuck are businessmen reliable???? When someone says business man I think of like an unctious used car salesman.
Same. These people say "business man" the way some morons talk about someone being a "xtian man".
WTF is the value in either of those things? Neither one describe anything, really, about their character or their ability to govern.
When I hear "business man", I usually think of Carlin talking about the business man with the big smile plastered on his face, the better to position himself behind the "customer" in order to "service" them better.
“I trust the business man” says person who has literally never trusted anyone with authority on that principle
There are a lot of people who think ability to make money equals superiority.
There are also a lot of people who think government would be better if it were run as a for-profit organization.
There are also a lot of people who don't believe dinosaurs existed because it conflicts with the in-universe explanation from their magic book written by imaginary friends....
There are also a lot of people who believe the earth is flat....
People are fucking stupid, americans doubly so.
Ya know what tho, I ain't even mad at the first time trump voter, I get that shit. Everything is broken and everyone is getting fucked, so you take your vote and you vote for change. If the establishment sucks you vote for the anti establishment candidate.... Just imagine the world we live in of that anti establishment candidate had been Bernie and not pedo 🤡
This is what I think. Let's take Mamdani for an example. I think what he's doing is great and I would vote for him if I lived in New York, in a heartbeat. He's doing exactly what we want a politician to do. He was inspiring before he won. Then I heard a recent interview and he was avoiding questions like a "real" politician and not talking real talk. It was annoying, even though I still think he's great.
I think trump spoke like they would. Of course, he was conning them and saying everything just vague enough to think he was always saying what they wanted to hear. He has a way to do it that is very slick, it's his superpower. Plus he's racist and was doing dog whistles left and right.
That may be because you're too smart to think of politics as team sports.
Unfortunately, there's a majority of people who see it as tribalism because they don't have the intelligence to think about politics further than Red vs Blue.
The sports team thing is so fucked up we need to stop doing that
You can blame Jamie Horowitz for that...
He used to run ESPN and brought the shouting talking heads 4square to "news" broadcasting when he moved to fox. He is the reason that the news is no longer the news, it's because of him we don't watch the news to find out what happened, and instead watch the news so that we can know how to feel about it...
He weaponized the angry red-faced bald white men yelling over each other, it was great when it was coaches but it's destroyed society and scrambled fragile voter brains
You mean voting 'responsibly' doesnt mean voting 'blue no matter what' like some people thought the voices meant? Like voting to save a country from a fascist rapist who is doing the things he said he would do, doesnt mean you support GENOCIDE? What will they think of next...?
I'm not saying it's any easier to understand, but it's at least present enough on Lemmy to be worth studying, because it's definitely not a left right or r d thing. It's ubiquitous.
And I think another commenter made the point that I strongly agree with, that much of this is based in personality and identity; but that isn't an inherent vice. Rather, if maybe we outline it as two ways of coming to a thing; maybe you are borne into a identity, and then later you come to understand the ideas that idea represents versus coming to some conclusions and the becoming the identity associated with them. The second, though maybe superficially seems more defensive, is far less human: it's just not actually how most people work. And if you want rhetoric to work, you have to accept people where they are at and meet them there.
three time voter, full time idiot.
That title does not need quotes around "Worst President Ever".
He is.
It's the name of the show.
oh, no, boo hoo! it finally hit their wallet in just the right way that it violated their specific "individuality"!
fuck them and their anti-social abandonment of the rest of the 350M+ of the rest of the USA
when I vote and think about my individual rights, I VERY MUCH ALSO am thinking about my fellow 350M+ Americans and their wellbeing. and their futures. I really am
I'm certain this person isn't and never has
I don't get to vote for my personal best interests because I'm too busy voting for the best interests of the most vulnerable in our society because I have an ounce of empathy.
It's sad how selfish people can be.
yeah, nobody gets the direct vote for their interest, it was an abstract comment representing the common vote in the last election, which you might have understood if you counted anything beyond your own concern, ironically hypocritical of what you, yourself, just said.
Hmm...
Three-time trump voter, will vote for him again in 2028 regardless…
Will forget party of law and order and agree he can run again.
Thomas plugged this website, https://leavingmaga.org/
He is promoting* his website where he sells his book
The author is named Rich. Different guy, but still a promo site in disguise.
I wouldn't be taking any kind of input or commentary from some idiot that voted like this three times.
I suspect some grifting by this 3x trump voter
Promoting their book and their website apparently. I didn't read the article but the other comments mentioned it.
"Oh no! The consequences to my actions now that they affect me!" - Every Trump supporter who finally sees Trump as evil 5 seconds before forgetting and sucking his micro-dick again
Please do not forget those sitouts
The stupid fucks who refused to vote for Kamala, especially over faux activism for Palestine have all this blood on their hands too.
You have to be living in a co.plete separate reality to say Kamala would have been just as bad as Trump on Palestine. It was obvious in 2024, and its even more so now.
Oh yeah, and let's not forget Netanyahu wanted Trump to win because he has Epstein blackmail on Trump, which we fucking knew in 2024
this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
202 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29829 readers
2008 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS