185

Top Virginia Democrats have decided against exercising a controversial procedural end run around last week’s state Supreme Court ruling that struck down their redistricting, which wiped away a gain of four House seats, the Democratic leader of the state Senate told The New Republic.

The decision—which nixes a complicated idea, discussed over the weekend by Democrats, to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard—is likely to anger rank-and-file Democrats who had hoped the party would respond aggressively to the ruling, which has made it more likely that Republicans hold the House this fall.

The decision also contrasts sharply with moves undertaken by many GOP state legislatures in the South, who are aggressively gerrymandering their states with wild abandon to erase decades-old majority-majority seats from existence, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key Voting Rights Act protection against racial gerrymanders.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 117 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

As expected. Dealing with the Republican voter suppression and takeover of Congress would require the Democrats have something resembling a spine.

...is likely to anger rank-and-file Democrats

But Republicans will approve which will be more than good enough for elected Democrats.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 83 points 5 days ago

if they aren't going to fight for their voters why do they expect people to vote for them

[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 59 points 5 days ago

Sorry, we're fresh out of backbone. Could I interest you in some complicity?

[-] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 42 points 5 days ago

Cowards, just pathetic cowards.

The Democratic Party will never beat the controlled opposition label, because that's what they are.

[-] HappyRapi@ani.social 36 points 5 days ago

Every so often I think that there's not another new low that Democrats won't go in order to preserve their status quo. Yet here we are. Can't wait to see which group BM decides to blame this time

Mr. Coates' comment of "if you can’t draw the line at genocide, you probably can’t draw the line at democracy" rings louder every fucking day

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago

One of the few silver linings in this mess is that a whole lot of assholes who don't deserve democracy will suffer a small fraction of what they've forced on others for generations.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 32 points 5 days ago

That's so dumb. All that they had to do was to declare that it was too close to the election, and preparations were too far along, and proceed with the new maps, anyway. There's plenty of precedent.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Ohio did exactly this, like a year out. Just kept submitting the same maps to the state Supreme Court over and over until time was up.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 5 days ago
[-] P00ptart@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Sure, just roll over and present your tummy.

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago

Classic dems. Ugh.

[-] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Utter cowardice. Pathetic.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If you live in Virginia, contact your state party and let them know that this capitulation to fascism is unacceptable.

They're cheating you out of the non-fascist future you voted for.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard

Y’all think that’s a good idea huh.

[-] PorradaVFR@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Yes.

Ideal? No. Preferable to allowing the will of voters being quite literally ignored? Yes.

Far, far worse is happening in states where unilateral supression and redistricting is taking place. Leveraging the ELECTED officials powers to enforce the results that were voted on is honoring their votes.

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Is there not still time for the people of Virginia to call and force their reps to take this option?

[-] PyroNeurosis 1 points 4 days ago

...wild abandon to erase decades-old majority-majority seats from existence, after the...

I think they mean majority-minority seat, where a majority of the constituents of the district are Americans of a minority designation (i.e. not white).

this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
185 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4614 readers
399 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS