1341
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 290 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Now it's an international matter of national security. Let's go world, time to de-americanize your tech.

[-] Drewmeister@lemmy.world 131 points 2 months ago

Yes, but, from the article: ”GrapheneOS also says governments and banks are increasingly adopting these verification systems for things like payments, digital ID apps, and age verification services.

“Instead of governments stopping Apple and Google from engaging in egregiously anti-competitive behavior, they’re directly participating in locking out competition via their own services,” Graphene said."

[-] synapse1278@lemmy.world 64 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Exactly, it's not only about fighting Google, it's also about setting a better, more open standard for the rest of the market.

Recently my bank has rolled out a new mobile app now relying on Google wallet for NFC payment. I was able to use NFC payment on GrapheneOS on the old app, I can't on the new one. The online banking stuff still works (for now) but no more mobile payment for me. I didn't sign a fucking contract with Google, why would I hand over my payment data to them !

[-] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

You need to call your bank and the media. Word has to get out.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] k0e3@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

I just made the switch to Graphene a few days ago and I found it fitting that my government's digital id app couldn't be installed on my phone anymore. Oh well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 125 points 2 months ago

Please consider donating to PostmarketOS to build up a pure mobile Linux alternative that is completely free of Google's influence. It's the best long-term option we have.

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 103 points 2 months ago

That’s an American thing, not just Google. They only believe in a free market when it’s their products and services. Theft is fine as long as it’s only them.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 41 points 2 months ago

When a Capitalist says “free market” what they mean is “free to monopolize.” It’s about keeping the pathway to feudalism free and open. The US is its temple, but Capitalism is a global cancer.

[-] Tolc@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

this is just capitalism thing.

[-] MortUS@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Something something... Capitalism

[-] notso@feddit.org 12 points 2 months ago

More like neofeudalism at this point.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 103 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Maybe the EU can slap some fines on that? It's anti competitive and against the DMA i assume

[-] HollowedFleshwalker@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

The EU can fine them for things like this but it won't make much difference. To provoke long term change, we need a way to block them from our countries and that's impossible.

[-] Canigou@jlai.lu 31 points 2 months ago

Let's start by fining them ^^

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MaggiWuerze@feddit.org 18 points 2 months ago

They can also enforce changes if they want access to the EU market

[-] HollowedFleshwalker@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We can't afford to start a real war with them because they control far too much of our technology. Yes, we could threaten to block their access to our markets but what if they don't change their behaviour? Do we go through with it? Some of their services are critical to our daily lives and just one day without a few of them and entire systems would collapse.

EDIT: Big tech corporations like Google are more powerful than governments. While they are not invulnerable to sanctions, we may lose as much or more than they do if we take drastic action without viable alternatives.

[-] UltraMagnus@startrek.website 11 points 2 months ago

I agree that it's too early, but disagree that it would never be possible. If the EU can successfully move away from Microsoft like they're trying to do now, then I think that will provide an excellent model for moving away from other tech monopolies.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 73 points 2 months ago

The current US government is strongly in favor of corporations screwing over individuals, so we aren't likely to get any help there. The EU and China are the only organizations that might be able to intervene. Unfortunately, they both seem more interested in the surveillance opportunities than in the good of their citizens.

We seem to be heading toward a two-tiered internet. One that will be accessible to everyone, but will be limited in terms of commerce and possibly content. One that will only be accessible to people who are willing to give up their privacy. That might actually turn out to be a good thing. Buying from the corporations could easily end up limited to the later group, which would encourage more people to shift their buying to other sources.

[-] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I completely agree.

...and as soon as OpenNIC takes their SSL/TLS Cert generator out of experimental and into something stable - we can start.

Privacy concerned people can start to rebuild the internet based on the original principles of "sharing information and ideas", rather than " maximizing engagement ".

edit: a word

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

I may start keeping a cheap device that lives in a Faraday cage that obeys the corporate rules and only comes out when I absolutely need it, and then a graphene device of sorts as my daily driver. Ive almost completely de-googled otherwise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wizzkidd@lemmy.world 49 points 2 months ago

I hope every de-googled os goes completely open source supportive. And i hope people choose these os's over google or any other closed source/centralized company

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well, yeah, we're well into the stage where it's not quality that sells Google products and services.

This is the Pillaging Stage of Google's business: as they screw both customers and users (Google's customers aren't their users) for short term "growth" they can only hold market share by taking advantage of market barriers to entry, networking effects and their current market share to force both customers and users to keep on using Google products and services.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

The irony of having this in the middle of the article

[-] eskimofry@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

The capitalists will sell us the noose with which we will hang them? or however it goes...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kamen@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure if "rival" is the right term. Seems like Google would be very happy to be a monopoly.

[-] lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 months ago

Most people don't care.

Hell I'm even the "weird one" only because I tend to use FOSS options when I can.

Who the hell would use YouTube over NewPipe??

[-] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Brothers in arms mate. I use FOSS whenever absolutely possible. I hear about a new type of service, and my first criteria before evaluating it is, can I run it as FOSS? If the answer to that question is no, then I immediately reject that new service until I can use it in a FOSS manner. Do not pass go. Do not collect one Monero.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 25 points 2 months ago

The duopoly keeps on adding more barriers to new entrants while alleging other reasons. Not surprised.

[-] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

And yet they force people to buy google phones to use their ROM.

At least soon there will be support for Motorola.

[-] lemmyng@lemmy.world 51 points 2 months ago

I'm sure if other phones met GrapheneOS' security standards, they'd have already ported it to those phones.

Motorola may just be the dam finally breaking on that.

[-] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 months ago

To be honest, I think for the average user most ROMs are more than secure enough. And from a privacy perspective a lot of the de googled ones are very good.

Grapheme has almost a cult following in a way that its all or nothing.

I'd rather give up a bit on security while preserving privacy, if it means my money does not support terrible companies.

[-] bonsai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 months ago

Then get a fairphone and load /e/OS or something else like that? GrapheneOS on Pixels aren't the only degoogled option. GrapheneOS makes it clear that their priority is security, so if you're willing to compromise on that then GOS likely isn't for you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] QueerQuery 10 points 2 months ago

Graphene user, not part of this cult you speak of. I used to be solid tinfoil hat but now I try to balance between security / privacy and convenience because it was all too exhausting.

Years ago I switched from lineage to Graphene because the Graphene experience was much smoother. Installs, updates, options, it's all just easier. Granted the last install was a pita as funny enough they required chrome for the install. Aside from that it's been so smooth that when my partner kept asking for a new phone, I had them agree on letting me install Graphene. I would have went with fairphone but I can't put something on their phone that I have yet to use. Graphene is solid, stable, and for the most part usable. There's a few minor things out doesn't do like customizations and slight compatibility issues but in relation to what it provides is an acceptable trade off for the time being.

All this to say Graphene has their place for non cult users.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] smeg@infosec.pub 22 points 2 months ago

Google and the Open Web

  1. Embrace

  2. Extend

  3. Extinguish <-- we're here

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ennof@feddit.org 20 points 2 months ago

European institutions and apps should be banned from employing reCAPTCHA, Google's Play Integrity API and Apple's App Test API, if this is how they are to function. At the same time, Apple and Google need to be sanctioned for this approach, as I am certain that it violates fair competition laws.

[-] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 months ago

Im just waiting for somebody to make a plan for resistance. So far the best I have seen is going to the doorsteps of google to cry and beg them to stop.

thats not my cup of tea

[-] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago

But I think the real reason nobody is doing this is the paradigm of reasonability.

Nobody want to step their foot down, because that's not reasonable. We are supposed to make it work like the wife exposed to domestic violence.

But we need to stop being reasonable and start being assertive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago

Graphene OS need to develop their own app store.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Time to branch out, get more manufacturer support like Motorola and champion the consumer. C'mon graphene throw us a bone.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
1341 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86470 readers
2699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS