It's really great to see one of our politicians answer questions as if they were actually a public servant concerned with the good of the country. I mean, obviously.

But it's equally tragic how unique it is for a politician to answer like that, and how many people in her own party (in addition to 99% of Republicans) will assume it is BS political talking points to suggest that somebody is serving a high profile political position for any reason other than blind personal ambition.

This is why I love her.

That’s my girl.

Im pretty sure that is a "no, not this time" answer.

I think she knows where she can do the most good, and survive to do the most good.

I like AOC but i dont think she is ready for the international political scene. I think she knows it as well. Domestic issues need her more, which happens in Congress.

And Jon Stewart, well i like him too but ... another celebrity/actor president? Really?

Speechless to old white redneck fucksticks perhaps. To the rest of us she sounds like a goddam American patriot who has the good of THIS fucking country in her heart.

"And a waitress will lead them... "

Better her than Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio by miles. If we are picking teams, AOC all the way.

"single payer healthcare is forever"

The chronically underfunded NHS creaks as I weep.

I don't disagree with her point though. In the UK, after decades of neoliberalism reigning supreme, I am often extremely depressed at how it's changed things culturally. I was born in the 90s, so all of my life, I have seen the people who are struggling most scrutinised ever closer, and the state becomes more and more like a business.

If the NHS didn't already exist, I can't fathom there being political will to implement it right now. There would be far too much outcry over people "reaping rewards from the system despite not contributing to it". There was that kind of opposition when the NHS was founded too, but far less of it. It was a different world. As I understand it, the Reagan and Thatcher era of politics were a big part of what caused things to change.

Learning the history helps ground me. A political philosopher I read a bunch of last year who influenced me greatly was Frederic Jameson, who advocated that we should "always historicise", because connecting to our history is a great tool in resisting the cultural logic of late stage capitalism.

Or to put it a different way: the society we live in has a way of making itself seem eternal and immutable, but things have not always been this way, and they need not always remain this way. If AOC spearheaded a campaign that led to single payer healthcare, but the scheme was later repealed, that achievement would still last forever, in that it could serve as a template for those in future.

I don't know if any of this makes sense. I'm just depressed and trying to clutch at hope. I'd say I don't know if it's working, but hey, I'm still alive — that's something. I should probably get some sleep though

This headline makes me want to kick someone’s trashcan.

Sadly, I fear the Dems keep her around for the same reason they keep Bernie.

To keep them reigned in so they don't become a threat to the old money powers. The last thing the Dems want is for them to splinter off into a viable third party, gain traction and actually make life better for the poor.

Keep your friends close and all that...

Man, AOC vs Trump 2024 would have been soooo epic.

Even if she lost, still better to put a good foot forward than what they ended up doing

Something like 75% of American voters want universal health care, 90% of Democrat voters want it, and over 50% of Independents.

(these are approximations there are many polls pick your favorite)

Unfortunately, in the USA it's "donations" that control legislation, cash is king. Our reps have two choices... do what Americans want (healthcare, higher wages and benefits, less bombs), or do what makes them and their entire family filthy rich.

It's hard to resist the allure of money, they won't give it up willingly. Landing leadership positions means millions of dollars a year, cushy political appointments (like your husband/wife landing an abassadorship to Bermuda), and other fantastic benefits, it's blatant.

Is this headline actually accurate?

Did this really leave the "political world" speechless?

why?

It's a cult of personality. She was against stopping weapons to Israel, and she voted with white supremacists in the past. I'm against MTG, but I'm also against promoting people no matter what. There are many people who are more suitable and that have integrity. AOC doesn't have it.

Iron Dome-Cortez for Pres!

Thanks, Raw Story, for the textbook clickbait. What a shit outlet.

She is right it’s not the title important and right now Dems needs someone that would unify the party. Trump won not because he had much more votes than 2020, but because Harris had 6 million votes less than 2020

I am already seeing a lot of Dems saying again they will not vote by X or Y… MAGA is voting doesn’t matter what

So the party will need someone that unifies more the party… but it seems unlikely

I already have an AOC 2028 shirt my maga fil got it for me, I'm not quite sure he expected me to like it as much as I do.