266
Half the size of a pickup truck? So like, a normal car?
More like 1/3 the size of a zambonie. Or 11/3 the size of two penguins on a foosball table.
Whats that in Rhode Islands? And how about mass, can I get that measured in bigmacs?
129 / 4.307213e+10 = 2.9949761 x 10^-9
That's in sq ft. Rounded. Length x width of a pickup truck divided by surface area of Rhode Island as reported on Wikipedia
It's over 9,000 bigmacs. This is what the ruling class does instead of feeding us. That's over 9,000 bigmacs in waste. Per loss. Just flame broiling in the atmosphere instead of going to where it would help the most.
How many dachshunds is that?
Eighteen Danny DeVitos
1200 raccoon peens, Rp.
Oh thank God... We almost had to use the metric system there didn't we?
We were within a hair's breadth of that awful fate.
within a hair's breadth
squints eyes
No, smaller, actually. A squint is 17.76 hair's breadths
Are all imperial hair bigger, or only Texas ones?
121 dicks in Africa, 322 dicks in Asia.
We almost had to mention standard cars, which are also half the size.
Americans don't drive cars, so they don't know how big they might be.
A car?? Is that some kind of libural version of my furd f300000 king ranch pedestrian killer edition truck?
Essentially the same but with a radiator grill that isn't large enough to intake an entire basin all in one go.
Where would I mount my 15 foot tall 'don't tread on me/thin blue line punisher skull' flag if there is no gooseneck hitch?
Is the measure in Imperial pick ups,
or metric pick ups?
Cochem mentioned! 😍
Yep, they are in Low Earth Orbit. A place that has a very, very small amount of air, so the satellites experience drag, lose speed, eventually the propellant tanks run dry, and they burn up in the atmosphere. The ISS experiences the same thing, which is why its altitude slowly falls, then you see a sharp increase as they push to a slightly higher orbit.
At the altitude the SpaceX satellites are at, they only passively stay up for a few years. With the onboard propulsion giving them each another few years.
How does half a pickup truck compare to a large boulder the size of a small boulder?
Large boulder is a state of mind. It achieved an awful lot that day and was feeling especially pleased with itself thus the honorific.
Complaining about Kressler Syndrome
Complaining about Starlink
Pick one, asshole. As shitty as Musk is, Starlink is in too low of an orbit to cause Kressler Syndrome
Every time somebody mentions Kessler syndrome they always seem to forget that low earth orbit is an area literally bigger than the earth's surface. There's about 10,000 of them and they are spread out over an area bigger than the surface of the earth. Meanwhile there are way more than 10,000 trucks in the world and apparently they are twice the size, and yet there are huge swaths of land that do not currently have a truck on them. I think we'll be okay.
Although I do accept they are probably irritating for astronomers.
Collisions aren't theoretical, near misses are so common that there's an entire department at NASA dedicated to detecting them and warning satellite owners to adjust course, I know because we were contacted about a possible collision involving our cubesat. Prior to megaconstellations being deployed if humanity stopped adjusting satellite orbits there would be a collision within a month, now there would be a collision within 5 days. It's only a matter of time until both satellites on a collision course don't have the ability to adjust course (engine failure or no propulsion/fuel/comms). In the event of a Carrington-style solar flare there's a good chance a decent percentage of satellites would be knocked out, making this hypothetical into a reality. Further, we can only currently track objects down to about 10cm, but NASA estimates suggest about 500,000 objects exist between 1-10cm in size in LEO.
A collision event is considered any event where a satellite passes within a ridiculously large distance of another satellite. It doesn't mean they're necessarily going to collide.
In the incredibly unlikely event that all of the things that you have stated happen everything would clear out within 12 to 18 months which given the fact you've just decimated 21st century civilisation is probably the least of everyone's concerns anyway.
A solar flare is just one example of many possible causes. There are plenty of other ones. You didn't touch on any of the others so let me explain - NASA reports on small satellite missions show that about 40% of satellites experience at least partial mission failure within their lifetime. Studies have shown the leading cause of satellite failure is propulsion systems, responsible for about half of all failures. This is not uncommon at all.
Most altitude ranges in LEO still have debris from decades ago, the exception being below 300km, which is basically still in the atmosphere. Unfortunately, debris strikes have regularly produced debris that are flung into higher orbits, so even collisions between satellites in this range are dangerous.
Edit: I also forgot to mention, the five day estimate (now three days actually) wasn't for a close-call, it was for a debris-generating event.
The only worry about low earth orbit is something survives reentry enough to become a bomb. these are enough to destroy a house if that happens - my undertanding is this can't happen but if they did
Starlink satellites aren't large enough to survive the heat of reentry. A more likely concern is the various materials vaporizing and dispersing into the atmosphere, as was mentioned in the article.
That being said, calling them "heavy metals" like the interviewee did is rather dubious. We're not talking about lead, as what most readers imagine when they hear that term. It's mainly aluminum and copper. The person interviewed is picking their words to overexaggerate their claims
Well if the atmosphere decides it's going to have a day off then I'll start to worry.
The temperatures generated by reentry are not just hot enough to vaporize a satellite they are way beyond hot enough to vaporize a satellite. I can't imagine any scenario where a satellite survives. In any case the vast majority of the orbits are controlled, Which means they come down over the ocean.
Reentry survival is a materials question. If someone decides heat resistant ceramic is cheaper all is well until that cames down and we discover it doesn't vaporize like iron (or whatever they make it with)
If someone decides heat resistant ceramic is cheaper all is well until that cames down and we discover it doesn't vaporize like iron
Yeah because that's likely. You do realise that everything that goes up has to pass inspections right they don't just let people do random things. Anything that gets put in orbit is verified by people way smarter than you or me. You really don't need to worry about it.
There's lots of stuff in this world to be concerned about but being hit by the orbiting asteroid is absolutely not one of them.
I would hope so. You seem to be under the mistaken impression I think the above is likely. It is possible is my point.
It's not only unlikely it functionally impossible. It would require the complete collapse of every system in existence in order to be even marginally probable.
You're wanting a system to re-enter under extreme heat, survive, and necessarily hit a populated area with enough mass to do destructive damage.
Likelihood of that happening accidentally are so low is do not be worth calculating. But yeah I'm sure you have some sort of point.
How many bananas is that?
DDG/Lucille Bluth says about 40,000-50,000 bananas.
always $ in the banana stand
Half the size of a pickup truck… a Mazda compact, or a jacked up GMC Hemi half ton?
Even just saying Ford F150 gives a lot of leeway.
They're about the size of a large flat screen TV. I have no idea why they reached the pickup trucks, they might have the width but they're only a couple of inches thick. A flat screen is a much better analogy.
OK what about a ford ranger then
Where I live, we have pickup trucks half the size of pickup trucks.
There could be cubes the size of gorillas.
Yeah that's what happens to absolutely everything in Low Earth Orbit in just a few years. Well, unless you keep pushing them back up like we do to the International Space Station.
These satellites are doing exactly what they're intended to do. These are actually pretty small satellites overall, there are a lot up there quite a bit larger that deorbit and burn up on re-entry just fine as well.
That's part of the reason things are sent to LEO specifically, because their orbits naturally degrade and they naturally deorbit themselves without needing any assistance or fuel. It also means if a satellite in LEO fails quicker than planned, is put in an incorrect orbit due to a launch issue, or just failed prematurely, it will fail-safe and deorbit without any assistance.
return to sender
preferably on his head
Privatizing space sure did make things more efficient, puh-raise JEE-zuz-ah!
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
266 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
85043 readers
1462 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS