309
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 120 points 1 year ago

id be more excited for this if it wasnt adobe.. fuck adobe

[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

You get the dress but have to subscribe to Dress Cloud for $50/mo and if you decide to discontinue it the dress randomly turns into a 90s era WB shirt and locks itself that way until you re-up

[-] Bogasse@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

If you subscribe for a whole year it only costs 599$ !

[-] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 106 points 1 year ago

Adobe: Pay $1699 yearly subscription or it will go transparent.

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Me, hacking Adobe and cancelling all subscriptions during the oscars: "You're welcome"

[-] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

That’s a cute dress. If I pirate it, will I get a Creative Cloud warning pop up when it dials home?

[-] Kerrigor@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago

You have to subscribe or else it just goes transparent.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Just update your host file so it can't connect to adobe.com

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 74 points 1 year ago

"Hurry up, we're gonna be late for our reservation."

"Hold on, my dress has to install an update!"

[-] netburnr@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago

I will wait until the gimp version is released

[-] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] reflex@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago

They gonna release an ad-supported version to turn you into a walking billboard?

[-] ansis@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

Is it gold or blue I can't tell

[-] massive_bereavement@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago
[-] krayj@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago

This article desperately needs video.

Here's the official video from Adobe. Bump to 45s into the vid to see the dress in action:

https://youtu.be/EvGquKkSFMM?si=_yo33O7N6VhFxYQO

[-] figaro@lemdro.id 9 points 1 year ago

Honestly lol what kind of absurd article doesn't include the video

[-] QHC@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That video is included in the article, it's just at the very bottom for some reason.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/EvGquKkSFMM?si=_yo33O7N6VhFxYQO

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Love this is what we spend our resources on while children go without food, water, electricity, education, and shelter.

[-] jray4559@lemmy.sdf.org 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You could say the same thing about posting on Lemmy. Or a new game in your favorite RPG series coming out. Or Starbucks' newest coffee flavor. Or any number of other comforts.

This is the "don't be depressed, starving children in Africa have it worse" kind of argument. Please don't.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Despite what the GOP would have you believe, The US and EU have actually achieved post-scarcity, China is close. You should be fighting for post-inequality because that is what is holding back the rest of the world, as well as millions of citizens of the US and EU.

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

The people who designed this were paid to design this. I presume that at least some of them have children. Therefore, resources spent to invent this did go to give children food, water, shelter, etc.

You're welcome.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago

you know you are talking to an engineer when they say

Non-emissive material with reflective light-diffuser modules

instead of "mirrors"

[-] huginn@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

I believe most mirrors can't turn their reflectivity on and off based on an electric current.

I could be totally wrong about mirrors though

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

You just haven't turned the current high enough.

[-] nothing@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

And why do you want this?

Or was this a "We can build it so we did"?

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Because it’s awesome and also yes.

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I miss when everyone wasn't super pessimistic about absolutely everything and it was ok to do things for these reasons

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CuddlyCassowary@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

And you can totally just throw it in the washing machine, right?

[-] evidences@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Dry clean only of course

[-] Gregorech@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

It's like the dress Rorschach made his mask from in Watchmen.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Still no pockets though.

[-] Dope@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

For some reason I’m not super impressed with this. Looks too much like you’re wearing e-ink panels. Call me when these are fully functioning OLEDs that kinetically charge when you walk.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Each one of those scales operates as an independent display, and coordinating them is quite a challenge. I'd be interested in knowing what is driving them, because it's surely not very portable.

[-] Dope@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I’m sure orchestrating this isn’t super easy (however, if you treat every “display” as a “pixel”, Idk how this coding is different than a woman wearing a dress made of addressable LEDs— on the surface it doesn’t seem super complicated engineering), but it appears as unimpressive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

OMG she's wearing the same dress she wore last week! She just changed the design!

[-] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Reminds me of the book The Diamond Age, where the clothes used nanotech to transform and become waterproof etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Melt@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A changeable dress won't matter, women will buy it, wear it to ONE event and then never wear it again

[-] 5gruel@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago
[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Women be shoppin - Abraham Lincoln

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Hey look its the prototype for Metal Gear Solid.

[-] kubica@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't know it sound more like a design for 10 years ago (maybe being kind).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
309 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59192 readers
2297 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS