217
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransNeko@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

don't worry... Dementia Trump will forget all about his "promise" after all... we are at the mercy of a Dementia ridden pedophile with a god complex. it really can't get much worse than this.

[-] webp@mander.xyz 3 points 2 hours ago

the crown jewel of capitalism apparently

[-] homes@piefed.world 119 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It’s Taco Tuesday, folks!

[-] northernlights@lemmy.today 44 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

OMG it's just too funny. Wakes up in the morning: "I'm extincting an entire civilization". In the evening after his nap: "Meh".

I mean it's actually not so funny, I was half expecting news of a nuke on Tehran by the evening. The commander in chief of the largest military in history is a lunatic. Everything's fine.

[-] homes@piefed.world 18 points 13 hours ago
[-] northernlights@lemmy.today 19 points 13 hours ago

My concern is he's obviously getting worse. What will he do next week?

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Next week he'll attack Iran anyway.

[-] homes@piefed.world 7 points 12 hours ago
[-] Aeao@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Donald have a snickers you’re not yourself when you’re hungry.

[-] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 1 points 33 minutes ago

Tbh, I think anyone but himself is probably an upgrade.

[-] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago

God, it's actually Tuesday.

I guess we should be grateful that the cosmic beings who got the assignment, "create the worst possible world," are terrible writers?

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 42 points 13 hours ago

My theory is that the genocidal pedophile scum at the Head of the United States and Israel are trying to provoke Iran into attacking one of their allies or escalate the war further so that they can use that as a justification for the mass murder they eagerly want. Trump and his cabinet are rabid animals so they will probably try to stage a false flag attack themselves.

[-] carotte 7 points 9 hours ago

do they even give a shit about justifications at this point?

[-] Ilixtze@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Regardless if justifications work or not. I feel It's important to be vigilant of how they will manufacture consent. I happen to live in one of the countries that was threatened by the trump regime, and if there is one thing we are learning about the debacle in Iran is that a militarily weaker country can manage it's geographical resources to at least put some pressure in a trump presidency that is not entirely popular with it's electorate and with an American economy that has very clear instabilities.

[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

They're doing a bunch.

I think they're mostly testing the waters of public opinion to see how much they can get away with. In addition, they're manipulating the market with these announcements, so they can make bank through stock trades, and on top of all that, like you say, if Iran escalates, then they can escalate in kind.

[-] fiat_lux@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago

Like the two week lead last year for the decision to attack Iran? I'm not sure Iran will buy that. The US is maybe trying for a sequel to "Operation Midnight Hammer", or, as the media chatter is heavily astroturfing right now, having ground troops pillage the uranium stockpile.

The media needs to stop reporting every line of bullshit Trump says and focus on what he and his bootlickers are actually doing. They keep letting him drown out the actual information with his predictable gishgallop.

[-] pubquiz@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

Is it TACO Tuesday already?

[-] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

Pakistan : I wish you would step back from that ledge my friend

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

you could...

[-] Janx@piefed.social 8 points 12 hours ago

“Brave Sir Donald ran away, bravely ran away away, oh brave Sir Donald. When danger reared its ugly head he bravely turned his tail and fled. Brave, brave, brave, brave Sir Donald!”

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

You think Donald Trump can run? The guy would get two steps and then collapse from exhaustion.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

This TACO Tuesday we have CHICKEN TACOs

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Bets on when Iran says there is no deal?

I think they'll announce that Trump has agreed to negotiate on their proposed plan.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

They already announced agreeing and reopening the Strait

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

From the bbc:

And even if Iran does fully open Hormuz – without conditioning passage on tolls or other payments – its ability to control the key geopolitical chokepoint is more clear now than ever.

In a statement after Trump's ceasefire message, Iranian foreign minister Seyed Aragchi said that Iran would halt its "defensive operations" and allow safe passage through the Hormuz "via coordination with Iran's armed forces". He added that the US had accepted the "general framework" of the Iranian 10-point plan.

That plan includes the US withdrawing its military forces from the region, lifting economic sanctions on Iran, paying compensation for war damages and allowing Iran to maintain control over Hormuz. It is hard to imagine Trump actually agreeing to any of those conditions – a sign that the next two weeks of negotiations could be treacherous.

Not exactly what I would call agreeing to open the straight.

[-] BC_viper@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I mean he only agreed if Iran opens the straight. Iran hasn't said they will do that yet.

[-] h4x0r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 13 hours ago

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2026/4/7/iran-war-live-trump-warns-of-devastating-attacks-as-deal-deadline-nears

In a statement published by Mehr News Agency, Iran’s Supreme National Security Council has confirmed the reported two weeks ceasefire deal negotiated by Pakistan.

The statement said that the ceasefire agreement was reached with the approval of Iran’s new Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei.

[-] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2026/04/07/world/iran-war-trump-news/16398b41-0447-593b-bccc-87aa037ecdff

Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, said in a social media post on Tuesday night that the United States and Iran, “along with their allies,” had agreed to an immediate cease-fire. He said the cease-fire applies everywhere, “including Lebanon and elsewhere.”

[-] ryper@lemmy.ca 5 points 12 hours ago

Ceasefire also includes Lebanon, Israeli news site reports

Israel's Ynet is reporting that the ceasefire also includes Lebanon.

Citing security sources, the website said the ceasefire includes both Israel and Hezbollah laying down their weapons. It did not provide further details.

Israel is onboard with the ceasefire, too. Haven't they done a fair bit of firing during the Gaza ceasefire(s)?

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Al Jazeera has Israel reporters saying this caught Israel off guard. Officials saying it caught them completely surprised

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago

Yeah there’s no way Israel doesn’t break the ceasefire by tommorrow.

[-] shweddy@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

Art of the deal

[-] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

As an early sunrise blossoms above Tehran, Donald Trump semi-coherently explains that he only agreed to stop conventional bombing and attacks.

[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, that was obvious.

He sure fooled the media though.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Everybody loves tacos.

The world loves you, mexico.

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

This is a few days old, but also super relevant.

It's always two weeks!

[-] Lumidaub@feddit.org 1 points 14 hours ago
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
217 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29300 readers
2283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS