808
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Apeman42@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

I also choose this guy's moon crater.

[-] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 51 points 1 month ago
[-] meme_historian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago

Not to be a dick...but imagine a mother putting her two kids who have already lost their dad at a serious risk of becoming orphans

[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 28 points 1 month ago

I don't think it's that likely surely it's less risky than driving?

[-] dehyzer@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago

It is massively dangerous.

As of April 2026, a total of 791 people have flown into space and 19 of them have died in related incidents. This sets the current statistical fatality rate at 2.4 percent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spaceflight-related_accidents_and_incidents

[-] dehyzer@piefed.social 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Or to look at it from a different angle, 5 out of the 413 total manned space flights have ended in fatalities, or 1.21%.

Auto travel in the US has a fatality rate around 1 death per 100 million driven miles. Assuming an average trip of 20 miles, that's 1 death per 5 million car trips, or 0.00002%.

So, roughly 10,000 (EDIT: actually 100,000, missed a zero!) times more dangerous than driving.

[-] its_kim_love 2 points 1 month ago

What do the numbers look like if we assume the average trip is from the earth to the moon and back?

[-] dehyzer@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago

Are you asking to change the definition of a car trip to the ~500,000 miles it takes to get to the moon and back?

In that case, rate of fatality is around 1 in 200 "driving to the moon and back" trips. 0.5% chance. So taking the rocketship is still significantly more dangerous.

More realistically, 500,000 miles is roughly a lifetime of driving. So these astronauts are being exposed in a single trip to a fatality risk equivalent of 2+ lifetimes of driving.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Ahhhh I see thanks

[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

No, definitely not. Spaceflight is still very dangerous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] its_kim_love 6 points 1 month ago

Why did you have to switch the genders to make this absurd point?

[-] Loco_Mex@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Because mothers get vilified for things but when fathers do it it’s heroic.

[-] nickiwest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

You're not wrong. Male CEOs do not get asked how they balance work with fatherhood.

[-] its_kim_love 3 points 1 month ago

I don't think mother astronauts get vilified. The first one did back in the 70s, but mothers are constantly going to space. Granted they weren't single parents.

Like I get what you're talking about, and you're not wrong. It's just a weird topic to inject into this post.

[-] berber@feddit.org 29 points 1 month ago

sorry i am too uneducated:

can someone explain what the meme is here?

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 52 points 1 month ago

Text + Picture = Meme

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 27 points 1 month ago

You know my first thought was that if I was a widower with two kids I definitely wouldn't work in a job that dangerous but what are the chances that being an astronaut is actually safer than driving an hour long commute?

[-] dehyzer@piefed.social 16 points 1 month ago

what are the chances that being an astronaut is actually safer than driving an hour long commute?

A trip to space is actually about 100,000 times more likely to lead to a fatality than a 20 mile car trip.

People really underestimate how dangerous space travel is.

(The math is in another comment below if you're curious.)

[-] Karjalan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I feel like the sample size is too low though. I wouldn't argue that it's more safe... But a lot of the deaths in space travel were in the early days when we were still figuring shit out and had less sophisticated technology for things like automatic abort systems etc.

[-] dehyzer@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

For a more recent data point, how about NASA's safety requirements for SpaceX manned flights, circa 2020?

Josh Finch, a NASA spokesperson, told Spaceflight Now that the agency’s calculated “Loss Of Crew” probability for SpaceX’s Demo-2 test flight is 1-in-276, exceeding the commercial crew program’s requirement threshold of 1-in-270.

Would you get in a car if you had a 1 in 270 chance of dying during each trip? Those aren't great odds for surviving a year's worth of daily commutes.

https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/05/22/nasa-review-clears-spacex-crew-capsule-for-first-astronaut-mission/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

You could die working in McDonald's, at least this way he can support two kids on a single income.

[-] usrtrv@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago

I don't know. If my parent was an Astronaut and they decided to stop being an Astronaut for me. I would hate that, feels like a burden.

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 month ago

"Hey girls, I know mum died, but I'm going to risk my life flying a rocket to the moon so there's a significant chance I won't make it back and you two will have to figure shit out on your own. Bye, daddy's gotta go, if I make it there I'll name something after you or something. I left some cash on the table, don't spend it all on pizza or meth, see ya! Well, maybe hahaha"

[-] Obi@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 month ago

I get why you're being downvoted, but there's definitely a wee bit of truth in there..

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Somehow it's heroic to abandon your kids who you raise on your own after their mother died to strap your ass on a big ass bomb, to go to a giant rock we already found to be inhospitable and useless 50 years ago. But thanks to the dick measuring contest between billionaires and dictators these days who sell their dumb ideas with fancy CGI promo videos which are total bullshit, we're doing it all over again. It costs billions, while people can't pay their rent, food, medical bills.

So I get the downvotes if you're an American patriot who jerks off to the flag every day, because Americans don't seem to care about child welfare with all those school shootings and known pedophiles voted Into office. Otherwise it's just dumb to think this guy is somehow a hero for risking his kids losing both parents. Or that the crater thing makes up for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] greedytacothief@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 month ago

"Hey kids, I'm going to be gone for 2 weeks... Cause I'm going to the FUCKING MOON! Get dunked on nerds"

[-] kossa@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah right. 'Cause he's a stay-at-home dad all year round and just flies to the moon in between for a two-week workation.

I find this claim of "he raises his two daughters" very dubious. I bet he does not have the time to raise that much.

I worked for ESA, I had lunch with 'just' ISS astronauts. Their schedule is packed. They need to be in constant training and if they're not, they have a lot of other duties. They're barely home. Bet that's even more true for astronauts flying to the moon.

I understand the PR, it's good to have role models out there, I hope his daughters understand. But...meh.

[-] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

Downvoted for being right, by butthurt americans desperately trying to convince themselves that the US isn't a complete fucking joke

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 month ago

Holy shit the comments ITT

[-] mtpender@piefed.social 10 points 1 month ago

Absolute Gigachad!

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Thousands of men do the same. Why is the guy who's in a roller coaster amusement park ride the one who gets recognition?

[-] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 19 points 1 month ago

Thousands of men do the same, every day, and they deserve recognition even if they neither want it or get it. Humanity can’t comprehend its own mass, so the occasional exceptional member becomes the focus of attention. This mission is plagued by the politics of American exceptionalism, “been there, done that”, and its own problems. Despite our advances and technology and Hollywood, still isn’t that easy to send a human around the moon.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Humanity can’t comprehend its own mass

If we can't fathom the billions of miles between the stars, how could we possibly fathom billions of humans existing?

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because all single parents doing their best deserve recognition. We don't know the other "thousands of men" or hundreds of milions of women names, but we know this one and we give him the recognition he deserves. It doesn't mean all other doesn't

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

We could have done the same goddamn thing without any people risking their lives strapped to bus atop a rocket.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

We could have tested the safety of a manned mission without people on the manned mission? How in the hell do we do that?

[-] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We could have taken picture's of the moon's ass.

There is literally zero reason for us to put people in space when we can send drones to do it.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

They're practicing for the future manned landing

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Senal@programming.dev 9 points 1 month ago

There are several reasons to put actual people in to space.

They might be reasons you think worth it, but they do exist.

load more comments (27 replies)
[-] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

They’re there to gather data on the moon’s surface and how being on a manned mission affects the human body.

We already have pictures of the dark side of the moon, so the intention this time was for the human eye to view it, since it gets much more detail anyway.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

But it's super cool.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

We already did that with Artemis I, this is a test flight for manned flights to build a base and explore further

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
808 points (100.0% liked)

memes

21349 readers
2612 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS