437

AI's impact on audio production has, of course, become a hot topic in the game music world.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spacemanspiffy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

I love his music so much that I knew who this article was about before opening it. I regularly just listen to both games OSTs.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

That's what you get for being useful to society, instead of a business snake, who's only purpose is to advance entropy.

[-] rndmdsplyname@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 days ago

Used to work in film audio post-production. Saw the writing on the wall the moment the AI cancer start to spread and moved to a new line of work. Really sad to see this.

[-] vantablack 24 points 2 days ago

i've seen people do fifty resumes A WEEK to basically the same result

[-] Agent_Karyo@piefed.world 8 points 2 days ago

Now that I think about it, I've only had two situations in my ~15 year career where I was able to get a job via a "cold application". One of them was the worst employement experience of my life. The other one was great.

There was some level of "getting my foot in the door" with all my other jobs. Internship after my Masters program, meeting someone at an non-work event and getting hired via former employers/colleagues.

That really sucks for your friends. I've been there and it really kills motivation.

[-] Alberat@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

yeah it sucks because every employer wants you to be excited for their company... but if you get excited, youre likely to get let down when you get rejected

[-] 1hitsong@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yep. When I got laid off last year my goal was 10 applications a day.

Most resulted in no response. Of those who did respond, most were boilerplate rejection emails.

[-] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago
[-] 1hitsong@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, I did, with a local company instead of a remote company like I worked at previously.

[-] Baggie@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago

Well that makes me feel less bad about the situation regarding my own career issues currently. If a dude like this can have trouble, anyone can.

[-] Broadfern@lemmy.world 134 points 3 days ago

Jesus fucking Christ on a shiny tandem bicycle. When the Alexander Brandon can’t find work you know it’s bad 😭

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

On the bright side, maybe an indie dev can him for cheap!

.... uggghhhhh....

[-] RedSnt@feddit.dk 3 points 3 days ago

Next it'll be Inon Zur..

[-] quips@slrpnk.net 104 points 3 days ago

As a musician I feel like AI is currently destroying music. It won’t generate anything new or truly creative, but damn does it make “good enough” take 10 seconds.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

AI is destroying everything.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

I remember meeting someone at an event that told me how great it was.

His argument was, "can you even tell it's AI?"

I said my biggest problem is that it's destroying new artists and original music.

[-] Ravel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

How so? People are still allowed to make original music. The actually good music is human made anyway.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

In the era of algorithmic recommendations, it doesn't matter if you make good music, it only matters if it cost the platforms 0.00001 extra dollars to recommend you vs any slop.

[-] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I agree but there is a lot of people back to buying music from artists and keeping their own servers and vinyl/cd collections. Even the kids. It might never be mainstream but there will always be art and artists.

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Les artist making a living out I'd their art means that will make less, and the algorithms will bury their work so they will have an even more uphill battle.

The current system is already stacked against new artists in favor of popular ones. This stacks them against a machine that can generate a century worth of music in hours, 24/7.

That there will still exist few artists and they will make a few sons means.... Little

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Its almost like capitalism is actual the problem, not that people won't want to make art.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Abso-fucking-lutely. I don't think it's quite there yet, it puts too many strange artifacts in the music currently, but it's getting damn close to "good enough".

Too many people think the danger is that it's awful. The danger is that it's mediocre. Because cheap, easily reproducible, and mediocre beats excellent, expensive, and messy every time because AI doesn't get tired. It doesn't go on a bender or get caught doing something reprehensible or burn out. It's never late. It just sits there waiting to be told what to crank out next.

So you've got this thing that can't move art forward. It can't inject that one really fucking cool thing in there that changes everything. AI can't hate a song it's creating so it emphasizes things in a weird way.

Compare it with Max Martin productions. He didn't invent manufactured music but he created a hell of a pipeline for folks to rhyme fire with desire. But even that relies on people who can sing with the timidity of youth and the confidence of a person who has been told the world is theirs. Or someone with no real understanding of a song singing it in a way that gives it a different meaning than the original intent. Or someone barely hanging on and pouring their entire person into their performance because they have nothing else.

AI can't do any of that. It can't turn a word into a god damned grenade. It's going to remix everything that came before. Not in new and exciting ways. Not in thought provoking ways. But in algorithmic ways. It's flat. The lyrics will tell a story that resolves. The rhymes will be perfect. You won't get a banjo in metal or a calliope in video game music unless it's a game about a clown. It's not going to give you soul and wit. It will give you a snapshot of where music has been and is up to the point of its last training data.

I have an entire tangent about how it's being used politically currently (go look up Danny Bones) and how it does not get tired or embroiled in controversy and being "good enough" makes it the perfect propaganda machine. But that's for another day.

[-] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago
[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago

Hey, I happen to like elevator music. Smooth Jazz takes talent, okay!

[-] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I like easy listening, which is kind of a precursor to elevator music.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

You said more than I did in my whole fucking rant. That's exactly right.

[-] mech@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

No, your rant was beautiful.

[-] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 9 points 3 days ago

I've been really enjoying just playing my acoustic instruments, not bothering to record anything at all. I think campfire sings are going to make a major comeback.

[-] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Now there's a silver lining!

People will have to stop trying to monetize their passion projects and start creating for the undiluted love of the art.

Of course, that means they'll need to find other sources of income. Which, under late-stage capitalism, is a disaster in its own right...

But at least our dystopian hellscape will have rad campfire songs!

It might also be a boost to indie devs and open-source projects. Again, not great for anyone set on it as a career path. But a small silver lining for the rest of us...

[-] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This is my hope for the bot-infested future, too. Acoustic tunes shared in the moment with your friends in person. A correction back towards the authenticity of real life in contrast to the curation of digital identity. I guess I'm optimistic in my pessimism.

[-] apotheotic@beehaw.org 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It depends what your standard is for good enough, honestly. If you're making art for the art, I certainly haven't seen anything from AI music that seems actually artful, and I wouldn't feel comfortable putting my music out into the world that didn't feel like art to me. If you're churning out 30 second jingles for advertising or microtransaction-riddled mobile games, maybe then the standard is lower

E: of course, if "good enough" is "enough to make a C suite douchebag give it the okay with dollar signs in their eyes" then yeah.

[-] marighost@piefed.social 33 points 3 days ago

@timsweeney what were you saying about employers seeing streams of resumes after laying off a thousand Epic employees?

(For reference)

[-] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

They are seeing them. But they aren't hiring a composer, they are hiring the AI company trained with that composer work.

[-] Aganim@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

He and Michiel van den Bos basically wrote the soundtrack of my youth. Really bizarre to see Siren is struggling to land a full time job. Sad times indeed.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago
this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2026
437 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14331 readers
445 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS