I mean, unless one or both of them is rock hard out of frame, to say there's no straight explanation is some really weird levels of homophobia/toxic masculinity... It's OK for guys to hug without saying, "no homo".
Man, I hate it when we apply modern standards to older depictions of intimacy. Used to be as a dude you could kiss your bro, be naked around him, and let him bust a nut inside you without anyone calling it gay.
"Please jesus, can you rise up one more time?"
We're all awaiting the second coming.
Is this U2 Songs of Innocence?
Juda looking like Logan Paul
Remember when guys were allowed to rest their heads on each others' balls, and it was just part of playing or horsing around?
("Children's games" by Pieter Bruegel, 1560)
Well you don't have to, that's literally how it still is in most other countries.
(Also being called gay is not a bad thing.)
Hug your homie and kiss their cheeks today, coward.
Behavior rules:
Posting rules:
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
