91

Today, AI is rapidly changing the way we build software, and the pace of that change is only accelerating. If our goal is to make programming more productive, then building at the frontier of AI and software feels like the highest-leverage thing we can do.

It is increasingly clear to me that Codex is that frontier. And by bringing Astral’s tooling and expertise to OpenAI, we’re putting ourselves in a position to push it forward. After joining the Codex team, we’ll continue building our open source tools, explore ways they can work more seamlessly with Codex, and expand our reach to think more broadly about the future of software development.

all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago

The ensloppening of some of my favorite tools begins?

[-] siera@jlai.lu 12 points 5 months ago

The developers were already genAI users.

But now I fear that the tutorial will include an "openai init", and other non-deterministic subscription-based commands for ruff and uv and that will be what is pushed.

[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 33 points 5 months ago

FFS, first Bun, now Astral... It's a shame, uv is such a useful tool in the Python ecosystem.

[-] prism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 5 months ago

Sigh. I knew uv and ruff were too good to be true. Just hope the community can fork before it all goes to crap.

[-] a_good_hunter@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Count down to forks in 3... 2... 1...

[-] siera@jlai.lu 10 points 5 months ago

But which form will survive ?

I want tools from the python foundation ! (I kinda hoped ruff and UV were taken over by the pypa)

[-] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

You can fork today. It'll work forever.

[-] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Forever? When every new python version breaks compatibility with the previous?

[-] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 months ago

They're compiled rust programs.

[-] Orygin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago

Yes but the language ecosystem is a moving target

[-] fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 5 months ago

I can't express how disappointed I am

[-] axum 2 points 5 months ago

This just pure fearmongering and FUD.

Calm yourself.

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 months ago

I find that Python requires a fair bit of discipline to keep it readable, and I've seen some very unreadable code written by people. Vibe coding with Python's dynamic nature seems like a match made in hell.

[-] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is true although that’s what enforcing strict type checking and good linting is supposed to help with. I think it’s partially an issue that you can kinda just type what you think and not everyone thinks efficiently/ programmer-y

Edited for clarity

[-] TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago

Agreed! I think both linting and type checking are extremely important to Python, but it's also an extra step that far too many people just don't take. And honestly, I used to get tripped up sometimes with setting up Python tooling before I started using uv.

Unfortunately I also have to work with the occasional Python script that someone just slapped together, and that's something far too easy to do in Python. It does kind of remind me of vibe coding. Initial velocity seems high, but if you're not thinking about it, long term maintenance tanks.

That's not to say Python is bad, and there is certainly a lot of good Python code out there too. But it's a language that does make it easy to make a mess, which will probably be compounded by LLMs.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It's manageable if you pass along these rules to the LLM. I've actually had more success asking the LLM than giving code reviews to some interns, and even someone who coded professionally before.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 5 months ago

AI is infact detracting from innovation

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Why?

Codex uses npm, no? Why do they need ruff and uv??

[-] axum 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If all this does is fund astral and by extension uv I don't see a problem here.

Hell, I'd take ai Corp money to fund making good tools for the community, as it's one less stack of cash being used on bullshit datacenters.

[-] megaman@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago

I just spent three weeks getting work to whitelist uv 😭😭😭

[-] axum 3 points 5 months ago

UV is open source.

Dont gaslight yourself thinking it's suddenly going to kill your grandmother now or something.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Poetry is not yet owned by a slop factory.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87393 readers
3746 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS