39
submitted 3 hours ago by MashedHobbits@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 hour ago

Didn't Trump "claim" he destroyed all the material LAST YEAR???

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

As noted in the article, yes:

Iran's nuclear programme is ​one reason Israel and the U.S. have given for their current attacks on ​Iran, arguing ⁠that it was getting too close to being able to produce a bomb, despite Trump saying in June that U.S. strikes had obliterated the programme. The IAEA has said it has no credible indication of a coordinated nuclear ⁠weapons ​programme.

[-] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Great. Way to put a target on a world heritage site.

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

This is all BS, there are no weapons of mass destruction.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Welp, you heard it here first, everyone: some rando on the Internet says without evidence that the chief of the IAEA is wrong, so there's no 60% uranium (different from "weapons of mass destruction" on which the IAEA agrees with you, in case you didn't read the article or even the headline).

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

After Iraq, you'd think it would have been obvious that if you can make a nuke you should absolutely do it as soon as possible.

Talk about a historic fumble

[-] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 hours ago

It's almost like they weren't...

this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1883 readers
693 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS