309
submitted 3 months ago by tonytins@pawb.social to c/news@lemmy.world

Donald Trump is considering a possible executive order that would require banks to make sure customers are U.S. citizens to create or keep their accounts, according to a new report.

The proposed action, reported byThe Wall Street Journal, would see banks collect information on individuals’ citizenship through requests for a new category of documents in order to open the accounts.

The Independent has contacted the White House for confirmation or further information about reports of the executive order, which has reportedly raised eyebrows among some banks in recent days.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 98 points 3 months ago

Damn, thats crazy.

Did he release all the Epstein files yet?

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 3 months ago

no, but he likes to uses EOs as distraction from epstein.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] oddpixel@lemmy.wtf 58 points 3 months ago

Let's pretend this passes and becomes law. Now imagine a nationwide call for people to do a run on their bank, and pull out all their money. Even when the banks try to limit withdrawals, it doesn't mean you can't come back at some point and keep withdrawing.

Not everyone would do it, but eventually the news would be running in panic mode, as would investors.

I'd imagine the banks would be keen to demand a reversal of the law real quick..

[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 23 points 3 months ago

If only people worked together like that, we'd do amazing things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

You wouldn't even need to organize some mass campaign to get people to pull money out. This thing will trigger a bank run all on its own. Do you think the banks have enough reserves to immediately cash out the accounts of every non-citizen? Sometimes a bank decides it doesn't want to do business with someone anymore and will close their account. If that happens to you, they send you a check with your account balance on it. But we're talking tens of millions of people here, many with substantial amounts in US accounts. This order, if implemented, would cause every bank in the country to collapse. They just don't maintain the reserves to cash out that many accounts all at once.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 10 points 3 months ago

Sharemarket too, I'd have to sell my US shares without my brokerage bank acct (I don't live in the US)

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 months ago

Let’s pretend this passes and becomes law.

It's en executive order. Nothing to pass, and it probably will get defeated in court unless they can venue-shop and route it to a corrupt judge.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] mracton@piefed.social 55 points 3 months ago

It’s long past time to kill executive orders. Even the times they are used for good, they are often legally dubious and live on the whims of the courts.

[-] just2look@lemmy.zip 43 points 3 months ago

They need to go back to what they were originally intended to be. It wasn't supposed to be a way to enact new laws, it was meant to give agencies direction on how to go about enacting and enforcing laws passed by congress.

The whole system is broken and corrupt though. So no simple fixes for any of the issues unless you consider tear it all down and start fresh as simple.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 19 points 3 months ago

It wasn’t supposed to be a way to enact new laws, it was meant to give agencies direction on how to go about enacting and enforcing laws passed by congress.

EOs should be considered dead on arrival and unenforceable unless they begin and end by listing which laws passed by Congress they're meant to enforce and enact.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 months ago

The problem isn't citations, it's the legislative branch and the courts not doing their duty of oversight.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

You can’t really kill them. Technically it’s just the President saying do X or Y.

On their own, they have no effect in law.

They only instruct the Executive Branch on how to operate WITHIN existing law.

[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah that’s gonna generate an absolute shitload of lawsuits.

Also, way to go speeding the shift away from the USD as the de facto global reserve currency. Jesus tapdancing christ.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Draining the courts' resources AND make daddy putin happy, sounds like a win-win for Trump

[-] IronBird@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

this is their goal, they're trying to collapse the US economy. disaster capitalism is all that's left when all other fields are taken/captured by effective monopolies. there's no room for organic growth, just smashing shit to the ground and buying up distressed assets on the cheap

we have done this boom/bust cycle many times now

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

I'm certain that suddenly de-banking all green-card holders will .. do wonders for the US's innovation-position, globally .. won't it?


Ideology masquerading as "thinking" never legislates properly.

Bullying idiots, with their oversimplification "reality" they're doing their bullying in.

_ /\ _

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 21 points 3 months ago

Corporations are not citizens, so all corporate accounts are toast as well, right?

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Of course not, just like rich non-citizens will have exceptions made for them. The rules only apply to the poors.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

So what would happen to all of those bank accounts of people on work visas?

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago

…or legal permanent residents…

[-] Tinks@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

Seriously! Anyone who thinks about this for half a second realizes the repercussions of only allowing US citizens bank accounts. Are we just eliminating immigration entirely now? Immigrants have to prove that they are financially self-sufficient and doing that without a bank account is... effectively impossible. Every legal permanent resident would be immediately unable to function in society. Most jobs require direct deposit into a bank account these days and won't issue paper checks. How do you even pay rent or a mortgage without a bank account.

It would be absolute chaos.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 12 points 3 months ago

It would be absolute chaos.

So a Trump Presidency term.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 3 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 10 points 3 months ago

OR just all the thousands of people from other countries that do business with the US.

[-] Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz 6 points 3 months ago

Hell even my travel Wise card gives me a local US bank acct number, I don't even have a visa

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 months ago

The article makes it sound like Trump's racism against Somais and hatred of Ilhan Omar has a basis in fact and sanewashes his invasion of US cities by armed goons. Not unusual for the often-shoddy journalism of the oligarch-owned Independent.

One thing that is correct that many people posting here seem not to understand is that there is no current residency requirement to open a bank account in the US. Some banks will refuse because of their own policies, but that's it. You have to prove your identity, not your lawful residency status.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

Do you want to collect less in taxes? Cuz this is how you encourage cash under the table compensation agreements. Fuck it, make it a law you have to be a citizen to own a home, trade stocks and buy anything that is not food. Ill get my citizenship from Niue where they have an average annual population growth rate of 1 person per year and ill go full on undocumented illegal who follows the lae by not paying taxes!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

So if someone is a permanent resident are they just expected to keep their money under their mattress?

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Their what now? That's ICE's money. After the pulled the immigrant out of his bed, that money was just laying there. Nobody owns it, so it's finders keepers. /s

[-] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

No need for the /s. In the Land of the Free the swine can just keep it. Legally.

(Technically it has to be involved in a crime, but ICE are criminals, so anything they do is by definition involved in a crime. And it's not like technicalities have ever stopped other pig breeds from stealing people's cash anyway.)

[-] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Correction, it doesn't need to be involved in a crime, the cops just need to pretend to think it might have been.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zink@programming.dev 16 points 3 months ago

So now republicans are cool with the government telling businesses who they can and cannot do business with?

I'm not sure whether to file this one under projection or just good old bigotry.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

He truly is the stupidest man I've ever heard of...and I knew a guy who boiled his sliced bread because the toaster was broken (true story, and he procreated...a lot).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] groupofcrows@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

Bank runs are great for the economy

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

What a shithole. But, in a weird silver lining sort of way, part of me doesn't mind the government hurting banks and more of the economy going underground out of reach of taxation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 3 months ago

I think this will ultimately lead to Trump hoovering up the wealth of his enemies, by closing accounts and having banks transfer the assets to his own hoard. DOGE stole information from the treasury, so Trump has a list to work with.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Why is that pedophile not in prison yet?

[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

They can open up Cayman Island bank accounts just like the billionaire tax evaders.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I wonder if the goal is to push more people into crypto to prop it up?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

Damn. Instead of releasing the Epstein files, he's really gonna shoot the USD in the foot some more. I bet they're stupid enough to also try to confiscate that money. Watch those Benjamin's become toilet paper real quick.

[-] ulkesh@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

Just waiting for that inevitable heart attack…

[-] Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I hope it fucking hurts, too.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 3 months ago

But Deutsch is free to keep the money flowing to POTUS, family, and friends!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
309 points (100.0% liked)

News

37758 readers
2275 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS