159
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

Lobsters.

We’ve been searching for a memory-safe programming language to replace C++ in Ladybird for a while now. We previously explored Swift, but the C++ interop never quite got there, and platform support outside the Apple ecosystem was limited. Rust is a different story. The ecosystem is far more mature for systems programming, and many of our contributors already know the language. Going forward, we are rewriting parts of Ladybird in Rust.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 140 points 2 months ago

Yeah seems about right for this project. I really wanted this to be a serious browser, but nothing about this dude is serious.

Also I know he backed this statement up with much better testing but these AI brainrot things people say kill me: "I ran multiple passes of adversarial review, asking different models to analyze the code for mistakes and bad patterns."

[-] XLE@piefed.social 62 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"I coded this with hundreds of handcrafted AI prompts."

"That sounds hazardous, but did you test it?"

"I had multiple AIs test it!"

[-] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 2 months ago

Let us all hope Servo does not go down the same path.

[-] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

artisan AI prompts. we are supposed to be paying extra!

[-] thenose@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

You’re not the first I hear saying his bad news/not serious. Afaik I didn’t hear a thing about him until ladybird. What did I missed?

[-] brianpeiris@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago
[-] BryyM@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Those were some disappointing reads

[-] fdnomad@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago

God that screenshot is giving me severe second hand embarrassment

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago

It is one thing to use coding agents to produce code. It is another to trust it on reviewing it.

This reminds me of the C compiler written by Claude Code, which was compiling everything, except printf("Hello from CCC!\n");

[-] arcine@jlai.lu 75 points 2 months ago

I was enthusiastic about LadyBird until I learnt that the guy leading the project i s a white supremacist, via pivot-to-ai.

Now I hope either someone else takes it over, or that it crashes and burns.

[-] 0x0@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago

If any creator can separate work from personal and the product is good I really couldn't care less with what they use their own time for.

I'm pretty sure you could find people with other unsavoury opinions in the devteams for both chrome and firefox, what then?

[-] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

No one can separate their creative idea from the rest of the brain. Any fool that thinks that's possible is straight up stupid.

[-] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I don't think you should be able to make claims like this without hard proof.

Do you have any information about this?

Edit: So I found out where you read that, and that article is wayyy over thinking that comment.

I think the Twitter comment could be taken multiple ways and it would be fair to give them the benefit of the doubt.

[-] Zangoose@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

How many times do I have to give him the benefit of the doubt though?

First it was the "using they in documentation is political ideology" Github issue, then he publicly defended DHH when people called him out for being a white supremacist, he implied tech companies are discriminating against white people with diversity policies, and he tweeted that he hopes young people will carry on Charlie Kirk's legacy.

If one or two of these things happened in isolation, I could maybe understand giving him the benefit of the doubt as a non-American (for that last one) non-native English speaker. But all of these things taken together? I personally don't think I can look past that.

[-] greyfrog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

To be fair I hadn't heard of some of these, so I think you're right. I wouldn't go so far as as to say he's a white supremacist but it definitely seems like he has an "ideology"

Edit: The more I read about it the more it's pissing me off. Especially defending DHH who wrote that trash article about London (I'm not a Londoner but I'm a Brit who's there enough with work to know he's talking absolute shit).

[-] Zangoose@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

That's fair, I assume most people probably aren't following ladybird that closely so it's easy to miss. It just bothers me because shrugging off small individual problems and ignoring a bigger trend is arguably what let people like DHH get a platform in the first place.

[-] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 6 points 2 months ago

Google's monopoly is a bigger problem than one guy having confused ideas, to me.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] statelesz@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

Came here to say this.

[-] db2@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago
[-] tinsuke@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Andreas Kling's ladybird? Don't wanna touch that with a 10ft pole.

https://hyperborea.org/reviews/software/ladybird-inclusivity/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] warm@kbin.earth 46 points 2 months ago

Rest in peace to this browser.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 39 points 2 months ago

I would of course love to see ladybird succeed, but it has seemed problematic from the start in my opinion. Servo seems much more serious.

I also like that Servo is developing an engine, not a browser as such. Seems like a good idea to keep the two separated.

[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Oh. Welp, if it's going to be vibe coded I'm out.

[-] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 30 points 2 months ago

Guess I got excited about this browser for nothing.

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 months ago

Birdpoop browser you say? Never heard of of it.

[-] tocano@piefed.social 16 points 2 months ago

I was enthusiastic about this project. But I am afraid these recent tangents will only reduce momentum.

[-] Matty_r@programming.dev 16 points 2 months ago

The worst part is they are doing themselves a disservice by not rewriting it by hand - have they really learnt enough Rust to know how to effectively rewrite the other parts of the engine as they say? Doubtful - they'll probably just do everything through AI stuff going forward.

[-] fuzzywombat@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

I've suddenly lost all interest in this browser's development. From what I've heard, LLMs are pretty bad at generating Rust code for some reason. If they used LLM to bulk convert C++ code to Rust, the quality of the code is questionable at best.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago
[-] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

Good grief, the irrational ai kneejerk hate in this community is insane. This seems like a perfect use case - a code base with good test coverage and well defined output expectations, where a human has guided the translation and checked the results. The human in question has saved a lot of time. And still all the comments are “hurr durr slop amirite”. SMH fucking head.

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

yeah, this part of the community is as insufferable as the overly enthusiastic vibe coders

[-] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago

And the people complaining about "insufferable" critics of AI, and assuming all criticism is "knee-jerk", are themselves contributing to the cycle of negativity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dsilverz@calckey.world 11 points 2 months ago

@Beep@lemmus.org @technology@lemmy.world

Ah, the smell of irony by the morning! Adopting a programming language often praised by its "safety", while the entire pretension of "safety" is alchemically transmuted into a sewage and deliberately flushed up (not down) by a clanker who drinks from the cesspool with the same determination and thirst that of a Chevy Opala gurgling down entire Olympic pools worth of gasoline.

Being serious now, the foreseeable future for Web browsing is definitely depressing: Chromium needs no introduction (used to be an interesting browser until Google's mask "don't be evil" fell and straightforwardly revealed their corporate face and farce), Firefox have been "welcoming the new AI overlords" for a while, text browsers (such as Lynx) are far from feasible for a CAPTCHA(and Anubis)-driven web... now, one of the latest and fewest glimmers of hope, an alternative Web browser engine, is becoming the very monster the fight against which was promised to be the launchpad purpose ("They who fights with monsters should be careful lest they thereby become a monster"). I wouldn't be surprised if Servo were to enshittify, too. Being able to choose among the sameness is such a wonderful thing, isn't it?

I mean, I'm not the average Lemmy user who got this (understandably) deep hatred against AI, I am able to hold a nuanced view and finding quite interesting uses (especially when it comes to linguistics) for the clankers (especially the "open-weighted" ones). However, this, to shoving AI everywhere and using AI to "code for you", it's a whole different story. A software should be programmed in the way programming (as posited by Ada Lovelace) was intended to, not "vibe coded" by a fancy auto-completer who can't (yet) deal with Turing completeness, especially when it comes to a whole miniature operational system that browsers became nowadays. When coding a whole OS, AI shouldn't even be touched by a two million light-years pole, let alone by a two-feet pole.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] chunes@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

The things people criticize are so fucking brainless these days. AI this, slop that.

Not a single one of you made fun of "let's rewrite it in Rust." You can't even elevate to the level of mildly funny parroting.

[-] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

“Let’s stop halfway through our multi-year project to rewrite it in another language” is peak nerd shiny distraction. I say this as one who resists the urge every day. Way to delay your project by several more years, clown.

[-] Zangoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

All things considered the way they're approaching the migration is fine enough - they're only moving specific portions at a time, they're not stopping C++ development, and they're making sure it doesn't introduce regressions. Adopting a memory-safe language for something like a browser makes sense because it completely eliminates that class of vulnerabilities.

The problem is the way they're approaching the code itself. From their wording, it sounds like they're relying on AI heavily for both writing and reviewing the code. Rust has a steeper learning curve than most languages and is very different from C++. They even mention in the blog that their current Rust code looks like C++ code ported over. If they don't take the time to actually learn Rust before adopting it, it'll just lead to security logic issues that their AI couldn't catch because C++ and Rust don't always behave the same way. And that's completely ignoring all of the other ethical/technical issues with AI

[-] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago

Be that as it may, the time to choose Rust was at the beginning. It existed then, but they made their technology choice. Continuing to develop in C++ while doing the migration just means more throwaway code and duplicated effort. This decision is truly the worst of both worlds.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 8 points 2 months ago

Is it a good sign for Rust code when it's described as having "a strong 'translated from C++' vibe"? Or when the developer says too much Rust might be something they "can't merge"?

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

out of context?

Please coordinate with us before starting any porting work so nobody wastes their time on something we can’t merge.

If you look at the code, you’ll notice it has a strong “translated from C++” vibe. That’s because it is translated from C++. The top priority for this first pass is compatibility with our C++ pipeline. The Rust code intentionally mimics things like the C++ register allocation patterns so that the two compilers produce identical bytecode.

that seems reasonable to me

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I’m still gonna try it. Downvote away. 🖕fuck the Lemmy hivemind poutfest.

[-] Nalivai@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Your deep insecurity is too on the nose

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Hive mind would imply that people are simply following along and not making decisions on their own. I read the article and was thinking that the way they went about it was a fairly good use of AI to actually implement code.

Then I read the article posted by someone in this comment section about how the author and creator of ladybird is not only a homophobic asshole but an out and out racist. If you support him and use this then you are, by association, a homophobe and a racist.

So fuck you 🖕 as well.

[-] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago

Every minute that passes, Gemini (not the Google one!) looks more viable, which is already a shame because as I described in lemm.ee before it went down, that itself feels like "Gopher but in the format of a brutalist buttplug".

What we need is some sort of return to HTML + CSS 1.0, or a web engine that simply ditches JS, so that development can be tackled by Individuals again.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
159 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS