34

For the purposes of this question, lets assume all future computers are gonna become locked down and you'd need corporate approval to run things... so with such a hypothetical dark future in mind: How to hoard as much as info as possible?

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Other than a set of encyclopedias, a good book is Pocket Ref by Thomas J Glover. It has all sorts of useful information (conversion charts, formulas, reference tables, etc.) You can also look at Desk Ref

Another are any of the Ugly's electrical reference books. Handy to keep with you if you do any electrical work or need to quickly reference some information. The Pocket Ref has pretty much the same stuff but Ugly's is more focused and less broad.

And of course a dictionary and thesaurus are good to have too.

[-] XiELEd@piefed.social 21 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

How to Invent Everything: A Survival Guide for the Stranded Time Traveler

It's basically a book on how to DIY various technologies

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago

Sounds like you're talking about an old-school encyclopedia book collection. Like Encyclopedia Britannica. They take up a lot of physical space and sing if the information becomes outdated quickly. But they are a great source for history, geography, science, etc. And you might be able to find them second-hand from an online seller for a relatively reasonable price.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Encyclopedia Britannica

They stopped printing in 2010 :/

Edit: also jeez an entire set of encryclopedias are kinda pricy ngl 👀

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Oh okay. Looks like World Book is still printing encyclopedias though.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Chemistry, math, physics, optics, metallurgy... The thing that is hard is how your needs for knowledge will change over time and what is accessible to you at each stage.

For general electronics, The Art of Electronics is the goto book. For actually understanding practical stuff, you need to build a knowledge of the industrial revolution and how it evolved. The inventions of James Watt opened up steam. The Bessemer process scaled iron. Large heavy castings drove the potential for large lathes, but lathes are the key to everything. A lathe is capable of cutting a more precise screw than the one used to operate it. That old screw can be replaced with the new, until you achieve your desired precision.

A reference flat is made using two granite stones rubbed together with water in between until the top one creates suction that can lift the other.

Prussian blue and hand scraping are used to make machine flat surfaces.

Automotive suspension components like springs and torsion bars are a good source of cheap tool steel. Engine heads are a good source of casting scrap and quality hardware. Wipers, window motors, and starters are great for building machines. Understanding how to repair and diagnose this stuff is a major skill. Knowing how to make real controlled heat is fundamentally important.

I've never encountered single sources for this stuff.

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 10 points 17 hours ago

You can actually download Wikipedia if you have the space for it.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Wait till they insert AI chips into your pc and start scanning for anti-government articles to delete out of your .zim file

[-] polotype@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

Just print it

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 4 points 16 hours ago

Then I will go back to the pc I have now. :)

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

Your PC can't last forever

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 4 points 14 hours ago

Just like books or AI chips.
There are some very well running commodore-s or amigas out there.
I think I'm set if my phone or electronics last that long from this decade. I only have 40 yrs to go - if I'm realistic:D

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I only have 40 yrs to go - if I'm realistic

Probably far less if society breaks down to the point that libraries cease to exist.

[-] Melobol@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Indeed :D no libraries = no healthcare. One broken bone over 60, you are done. Probably people could handle a rotten tooth...
So how do we make antibiotics at home? :D

[-] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Engineering textbooks and presumably chemistry and medical textbooks. But you then have to be careful to select one that's not massively confusing and a slog to read

[-] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

I'll probably get vote-murdered for this, because this is unfortunately not a popular opinion for a lot of very justified reasons that I actually mostly agree with, but I'm going to throw this out there anyway, and I hope people hear me out for long enough that you can decide for yourself instead of just kneejerk downvoting.

Imagine if someone created a statistical numerical model that was based on, and could therefore approximately reproduce something close to the cumulative total of all human knowledge ever recorded on the internet which probably represents exabytes of information, but this numerical model was only the size of a few movie files, and you could dump those numbers into a simulator that within some margin of statistical error, reproduced almost any of that information on currently available consumer-level hardware.

If you're not picking up what I'm putting down, I just described open weight LLMs that you can download and run yourself in ollama and other local programs.

They are not intelligences and they do not represent knowledge, because they don't know anything, can't make their own decisions and can never be assumed to be fully accurate representations of anything they have "learned" as they are simply greatly minimized and compressed statistical details about the information already on the internet, but they actually still contain a great deal of information, provided you understand what you're looking at and what it's telling you. The same way demographics can provide a great deal of information about the world without needing to individually review every census document by hand, but never tell the entire story perfectly.

While I agree with the suggestions to get a proper encyclopedia or just download Wikipedia, for a more reliable and trustworthy dataset, I think you're doing yourself a disservice if you dismiss the entire concept of LLMs and vision models just because a few horrific companies are hyping them and overselling them and using them to destroy the world and civilization in disgustingly idiotic ways. That's not the fault of the technologies themselves. They are a tool, a tool that is being widely misused and abused, but it's also a tool that you can use, and you get to decide whether you simply use it wisely, or abuse it, or don't use it at all. It's your call. It's already there. You decide what to do with it. I happen to think it's got some pretty cool features and can do some remarkable things. As long as I'm the only one in charge of deciding how and when it's used. I acknowledge it was plagiarized and collected illegally, and I respect that (as much as I respect any copyright) and I'm not planning to profit from it or use it to pass off other people's work as my own.

But as a hyper-efficient way to store "liberated" information to protect ourselves against the complete enshittification of content and civilization? I don't see the harm. Copyright is not going to matter at that point anyway, the large companies who control the data and the platforms for it have already proven they don't respect it and they're going to be the ones dictating it in the future. They won't even let us have access to our own data, nevermind being able to do anything to prevent them from taking it in the first place. We, the people and authors and artists and musicians and content creators it was designed to protect, now have to protect ourselves, from them, and if that means hiding some machine learning models under my bed for that rainy day, so be it.

[-] fizzle@quokk.au 3 points 14 hours ago

the title says non-electronic, so you're dead in the water really.

Anyhoo, if I were living in an apocalypse and had a laptop, would I prefer that it had wikipedia or an LLM?

It really depends on accuracy of the information it's outputting versus the storage requirements of the model, compared to the storage requirements of a wikipedia dump.

Regardless, it's kinda comical to imagine a non-technological society being able to consult one of our LLMs without any understanding of technology generally. Like you could ask it to describe the chemical makeup of the star Proxima Centauri and it would give you a response that would sound absolutely infallible and you would have no way to validate it - it would seem to have god-like prescience. Then you could ask it something mundane and it either lies or tells you it's unable to answer.

[-] yellowbadbeast 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think that, while yes, LLMs are an option for data storage, I don't think that they're worth the effort. Sure, they might have a very wide breadth of information that would be hard to gather manually, but how can you be sure that the information you're getting is a good replica of the source, or that the source that it was trained on was good in the first place? A piece of information could come from either 4chan or Wikipedia, and unless you had the sources yourself to confirm (in which case, why use the LLM as all), you'd have no way of telling which it came from.

Aside from that, just getting the information out of it would be a challenge, at least for the hardware of today and the near future. Running a model large enough to have a useful amount of world knowledge requires a some pretty substantial hardware if you want any amount of speed that would be useful, and with rising hardware costs, that might not be possible for most people even years from now. Even with the software, if something with your hardware goes wrong, it might be difficult to get inference engines working on newer, unsupported hardware and drivers.

So sure, maybe as an afterthought if you happen to have some extra space on your drives and oodles of spare RAM, but I doubt that it'd be worth thinking that much about.

[-] Doll_Tow_Jet-ski@fedia.io 1 points 15 hours ago

I like the idea, but I'm not sure what the math behind it would be

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Penguin publishes reference “dictionaries” of various subjects, that are more like mini-encyclopedias. I’ve got ones covering mathematics, philosophy, psychology, sociology, and literary theory.

[-] INeedANewUserName@piefed.social 2 points 16 hours ago

CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics better known as the rubber book

[-] Today@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Look that up in your Funk and Wagnalls!

this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
34 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

46649 readers
403 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS