1310
submitted 2 months ago by not_IO to c/privacy@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 130 points 2 months ago

Jesus Christ, what the fuck is going on in the UK and the rest of Europe right now with this age verification nanny state shit?

If I ran a website that would be subject to these new regulations, do you know what I would do? I'd fucking IP ban all of the United Kingdom, not comply in advance with this fascist horseshit.

If there's one silver lining about this digital insanity going on right now, it's that governments and corporations are essentially forcing users underground, and the dark web (unindexed websites) has the potential to grow and thrive as a result. We might have an opportunity to take the internet back from those who are trying to tighten their grip around the free and unfettered flow of information.

[-] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 48 points 2 months ago

A lot of websites have already done that. A lot of image hosting sites. If I forget to turn the VPN on my feed looks about 30% like this

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They have to fast track the mandatory ID laws now because the Epstein files is rapidly making people realize what their true intentions are

[-] underisk@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unless you're based in or have some kind of presence in those countries there's no reason to even ban them. Banning by geolocation isn't exactly trivial or reliable. Let them figure out a way to ban you instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Restaldt@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The deepstate is real. Its Right here cumming for your porn.

To get a little more serious about it look into Who is buying our media outlets and who is buying our financial outlets (visa/mastercard).

This is almost always being pushed by a rightwing cult. Sorry "thinktank".

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

newspapers owned by foreign billionaires and shitty childrens authors that give epstein tickets to her play for children

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 67 points 2 months ago

There's plenty of ways age checking could be decoupled from identity checking, and I find it extremely suspicious that the proponents of these laws aren't promoting them.

[-] wylinka@szmer.info 9 points 2 months ago
[-] skisnow@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago

There's lots of cryptographic type approaches where the entity validating you is air-gapped from the entity certifying your age.

But if you don't trust them it's not hard to figure out a scratchcard system where for, say, £1 cash your local newsagent checks your ID and lets you pick a card that you scratch off to get a code that you can then use to obtain a cryptographic token online signed by a recognized CA. Neither the newsagent nor the card issuer have any way of tying you to that code, and if you don't like the idea of using the same token on multiple sites you can always buy more. Of course you'd also have the option of obtaining codes online, but there's something I think people would find reassuring about the existence of a visible physical gap.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

In my country if you want to buy booze online, you verify your age by logging into this id check service the banks have set up. The bank will only send if the buyer is 18+ or not to the store. So no identification data is send to the store not even the actual age.

[-] 0x0@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

You'd have to rely on your country's banks not relaying all info anyway, pinky promise, but it's an interesting model.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] herseycokguzelolacak@lemmy.ml 56 points 2 months ago

Age verification laws are just an excuse to kill anonymity on the internet.

[-] osanna@thebrainbin.org 51 points 2 months ago

if people are technically inclined, a service like Tailscale can be used to circumvent things like the online safety act. with the exit nodes.

[-] osanna@thebrainbin.org 24 points 2 months ago
[-] zo0@programming.dev 41 points 2 months ago

Roll up your own vpn? Where the server is in your name? Or your home IP?

[-] osanna@thebrainbin.org 24 points 2 months ago

yeah, it’s not even close to being anonymous, but at least you will get out of the OSA bullshit

[-] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I2P.

Essentially, what if the entire internet worked kinda like how torrents do, and was also anonymized and E2EE?

Well, it would be pretty slow, but it would also be extremely distributed and difficult to censor/disrupt.

Basically, everyone on I2P is a micro-relay for everyone else.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] avg@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 months ago

Every politician proposing such rules must first make their browsing history public, it should go both ways right?

[-] artyom@piefed.social 14 points 2 months ago

I've always wondered why we aren't buying/hacking info about politicians that support anti-privacy legislation from these databrokers and leaking it to the public. If I had the knowledge that's what I'd be doing. I can't think of anything that would be more effective.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Cameras everwhere they are and following them everywhere, always on recording of their means of communication, all free to access by anybody at any time.

Surely those politicians "have nothing to hide"?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 2 months ago
ssh -D 1337 anywhere@elseinthe.world

is this a VPN?

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 24 points 2 months ago

Oi, you got a loicense for that session?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] manxu@piefed.social 32 points 2 months ago

It's not just age verification: the identity-verifying document's image is kept on servers for future use. Theoretically by governments verifying, practically so that everyone's identity can be highjacked in a leak.

Adult verification is simply determining a single bit: is this person an adult or not? We have had zero-knowledge proof for ages: if the government really wanted to determine this single bit, it could do so without jeopardizing everyone's privacy and online security.

[-] BlueKey@fedia.io 32 points 2 months ago

How should this be enforced? Mullvad doesn't even know where the customers are from (if they pay anonymosly), so they can't check if the legislation applies to a specific customer.

Also (and I'm not trying to legitimate such law projects), age verification without identity leak is possible. The government needs to distribute a ZK proof system linked to ID cards which creates a signed proof including "holder of the ID is over/under 18" and a service-dependend pseudonym (to prevent repeating the proof for other users).

[-] Strawberry@sh.itjust.works 39 points 2 months ago

I don't think it's intended to be enforced very well, just to 'boil the frog' so to say. Either that or incompetence & not realising it won't work.

Even if it passes and isn't enforced well it'll legitimise more surveillance & identity checks. It'll probably be terrible for privacy on people who aren't as tech literate to avoid it.

[-] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

This is pretty much it. Someone will google "what's the best VPN" and get an AI generated answer that leads them to some bigger service that adheres to identification laws. That'll filter most regular users.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Lojcs@piefed.social 29 points 2 months ago

I wonder if in the future we'll get to know exactly who pressed the digital freedoms crackdown button on the summer of 2025. Things were going backwards already before then but the sudden acceleration is curious and concerning to me.

[-] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

It's to move to a risk management based society. Look at the sociology behind all of this and you would see a counter example. this was already being accelerated the first step was facial recognition years ago. Surveillance states are defaults in risk management societies. In a nutshell if we treat everyone like a criminal then its only a matter of time before we catch someone is their consciousness going forward.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

When do we just start killing politicians?

[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

46 years ago. Start with Reagan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 months ago

Just goes to show governments still don't understand technology.

Rent a cloud server somewhere and create a tunnel to it, done.

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Rent a cloud server and create a financial paper trail

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

That's going to be a crazy policy to try and enforce. Reminds me of the US attempt to ban sports gambling online but only domestically. That just prompted people to make accounts overseas.

As usual, the governmental response is to increase the surveillance state and punish the end users, without addressing the incentive to create or distribute illicit content. They're just feeding a sprawling black market which... may be the intent. Black markets are notoriously unregulated and far easier to manipulate/gouge/swindle people over.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 months ago

I like how this is the same country that brought us 1984

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Orwell was a British police officer in Myanmar, crushing independence movements and worker organizations, during the early parts of his career.

He wrote these books from lived experience. As propaganda tools to antagonize against the USSR, they were brilliant expressions of the very Doublespeak his most famous book coined. Using fear of the foreigner to rally people into the Two Minute Hate sessions he ostensibly pillared.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 20 points 2 months ago

Gotta punish the peasants for daring to look into the private life of the pedophiles.

Have you considered how you use the internet and don't spend enough money to be a greater sin? You should.

[-] ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

So could I VPN out of the UK to circumvent the VPN verification step?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] KelvarCherry 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Gonna say the thing: IDGAF if kids see porn online. I'd far prefer children explore pornography and learn what they are and are not comfortable with; rather than risk being exploited by less-naive children or adults. Open access to porn is the harm reduction. They are images on a screen.

Let's not pretend that today's adults never saw porn growing up. I, a Gen Z kid, saw porn at young ages. There are reasons I am "off" in the head but none of them have to do with porn; and many of them have to do from forces who, among other things, push the purity culture narrative. This is the exact same over-dramatic messaging as the USA's War on Drugs or its "Satanic Panic"—both of which source from purity culture and both of which have harmed significantly more kids than what they hoped regulate.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 11 points 2 months ago

I think we all know what happens to declining empires, but is anyone clear on whether that's supposed to happen to their vassals too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 months ago

I wonder how many MPs and Lords use VPNs. It would be a shame if someone leaked which MPs and Lords were regularly using VPNs.

[-] Sbergon@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago

Is this actually possible to enforce? To stay with the example of Mullvad, you could still send an envelope full of cash over to Sweden to add time to your account (or create a new one).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Guess the number of tor users in the UK is about to explode

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 2 months ago

Fortunately all the good VPN providers have onion services and accept monero

[-] Iambus@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

UK is a joke, what is going on over there

[-] inkzombie 7 points 2 months ago

Even if an ID was verified without storing any data, how would they know if people were reusing the same ID or if someone else was accessing the account? ID verification isn't the solution. But punishing negligent parents will incentivize them to do their job and watch what their kids do online

[-] horn_e4_beaver@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago

Please present your ID to make use of Tor.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2026
1310 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

9773 readers
83 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS