431
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/politics@lemmy.world

Newsom and his team have successfully tapped into the need that many rank-and-file Democrats have for adopting a confrontational approach to Trump and his policies. But few people outside of California know much about the governor’s actual record — and many Democratic voters will be turned off to learn that his fervent opposition to a billionaire tax is part of an overall political approach that has trended more and more corporate-friendly.

A year ago, Newsom sent about 100 leaders of California-based companies a prepaid cell phone “programmed with Newsom’s digits and accompanied by notes from the governor himself,” POLITICO reported. One note to the CEO of a big tech corporation said, “If you ever need anything, I’m a phone call away.” While pandering to business elites, Newsom has slashed budgets to assist the poor and near-poor with healthcare, housing and food – in a state where seven million live under the official poverty line and child poverty rates are the highest in the nation.

...

“Governor Newsom’s reluctance to propose meaningful revenue solutions to help blunt the harm of federal cuts undermines his posture to counter the Trump administration.” The statement said that the proposed budget “will leave many Californians without food assistance and healthcare coverage.”

So far, key facts about Newsom’s policy priorities have scarcely gone beyond California’s borders. “National media have focused on Newsom as a personality and potential White House candidate and have almost completely ignored what he has and has not done as a governor,” said columnist Dan Walters, whose five decades covering California politics included 33 years at the Sacramento Bee. “It’s a perpetual failing of national political media to be more interested in image and gamesmanship rather than actual actions, the sizzle rather than the steak, and Newsom is very adept at exploiting that tendency.”

Also see https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/10/gavin-newsom-presidential-candidate-democrats

Like Trump, Newsom breaks promises, serves billionaire interests and mistakes social media theatrics for leadership. Is that really what American voters will want in 2028? After Richard Nixon, Americans chose Jimmy Carter. After George W Bush, they chose Barack Obama. After Trump, they’ll likely want change – authentic, strong, moral leadership, a leader with competence and vision.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 124 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Anywhere else in the country, Newsom would have run as a Republican.

Genuinely, if Newsom is selected by the Democratic party in 2028, nothing will change and we'll be staring down the barrel of ~~trump 2.0~~ the next fake populist/fascist in 2032.

There are only two ways for the Democratic party to be relevant at this point:

  1. Support politicians who bring actual change to improve people's lives
  2. Actually punish Republican politicians for all of the crimes that they are doing in broad daylight right now.

But the Dems showed in NY how they feel about #1, and are refusing to do anything with #2 in Minnesota (and completely fumbled the opportunity they had over the last few ~~years~~ decades nationwide)

Edit: for the pedantic twats that couldn't infer my meaning

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

All the not-Republicans need to pick a leader now. Before one is picked for them.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago

We never pick a leader, that's a role exclusively delegated to the party. We have the illusion of choice with primaries but in the end the party always gets their pick

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago

progressive credentials

He's only progressive if you squint a little, really want very badly to see him as progressive, and then pretend his actions line up with his progressive speech. And even the left-most of his speech is really milquetoast progressive, like elevator muzak rock and roll.

[-] carotte 53 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

libs in this thread, having already settled for mediocrity 2 years before there’s an election lol

like yea guys, keep putting shitass unappealing candidates and blaming their loss on scary internet communists who, as we all know, actually account for most of the non-voting population in the US. it worked so well the last checks notes 2 times.

[-] hector@lemmy.today 18 points 1 week ago

Last 3x, and it's the same strategy they've been running for 36 years, since 1990 with Bill Clinton, Epstein super friend. Total coincicence I'm sure that the democratic party was captured by a faction of the ruling class right when the israeli honeypot operation ensnared them all in child fucking blackmail, and god knows what else they have them on.

It's not just about Israel is the thing. It's a lot of the same billionaires with designs on the US to follow in that direction. And we don't know who all got copies of what blackmail they accumulated over three decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 46 points 1 week ago

He does fine as a thorn in Trump's side. But that's it.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You mean he does fine as the WWE kfabe opponent to Trump who performs the character of a resistance fighter on stage right?

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

For a corporate Dem like Newsom, that’s the most we’re ever going to get is theatre. So yeah.

To this post’s point, hell no on rallying behind him in ‘28. There are those who claim the DNC leadership has evolved and won’t be captured by corporate interests this time around. I think whether they attempt to shove Newsom down our throats is the perfect test of this theory.

Unfortunately, so much hangs in the balance of that decision. Really hate the two party trap we’re living in, at times like this especially.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wuffah@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

At this point, I would vote for an upturned mop painted with lipstick for president.

[-] Rhoeri@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago

Any sane person would, but these kids would have you believe the perfection is out there waiting to be voted for.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeardededSquidward 29 points 1 week ago

Gruesome Newsom WILL lose the Democrats the election. They keep putting up milque toast corporatist candidates then wonder why no one left of them really wants to vote for them. I've been whipped on by them so long to "Vote Blue No Matter Who" I'm going to tell them to pound dirt if they select Newsom. This entire "voting for the lesser evil" bullshit is so old. When we had a chance to get someone decent in office they pulled the rug out from under him to put in Hillary. Nope, not playing that game anymore Neo-Libs. You're just as bad as the Republicans to me now.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

I think he’s blue MAGA fascist scum who should be tarred, feathered and barred from government if he survived. I remind others of this constantly. He must never be tolerated as a candidate again. If he were to somehow steal a nomination he is not to be voted for, revolution will be the only chance we have left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pratai@piefed.ca 20 points 1 week ago

Here come the protest voters to ensure Trump’s legacy continues.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 31 points 1 week ago

I am trying to get us to win by having a candidate that actually has a chance, which Gavin doesn't because the more everybody learns about him nationally the less people like him, what the hell are you trying to do?

[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Your just here to slam dems. Happens every election cycle. Flick off and eat trash you Russian bot.

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I make a good chunk of the posts on the Ukraine sopuli community to pro-Ukrainian news coverage, you could not have picked a worse lazy accusation to throw clumsily in my direction. Check my post history, and next time think before you type :)

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] nednobbins@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Every time these "less than perfect" candidates get elected they end up screwing us over and giving the Republicans fertile ground to expand their power networks. We've given such fake saviors countless opportunities and look where it's landed us.

It's going to take more than a good show of being anti-Nazi.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

They never reverse any of the facist policies either

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago

Remember, the "both sides" argument is always helpful, aren't you glad you dodged having Kamala Harris for president?!?

[-] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I voted for Kamala, asshat.

[-] Turret3857@infosec.pub 23 points 1 week ago

"Guys I know we're 2 years out from the Presidentals but stop shitting on the open transphobe who platforms literal Nazis on his podcast, is married to a registered republican and doesnt do anything remotely left leaning for his state! At least he's a democrat!"

😐

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago

We just don’t want to be stuck with a lame duck as our only option.

[-] dreamkeeper@literature.cafe 10 points 1 week ago

We don't have to settle for Newsome, the primary isn't until 2028, so it's a good idea to snuff the thought out now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Two years away. Useless to even talk about this. Everyone remember desantis? Yeah, see how that turned out.

Relax and vote in every election, especially primaries. But yeah... Relax.

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Pelosi is pushing Gavin Newsom, which is why people are not happy.

[-] BeardededSquidward 9 points 1 week ago

Pelosi has a lot of political clout amongst the establishment Dems. And she's going to absolutely lose it for them if she continues.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And we wait two years and people say oh well let's pick the safe option and we have the most corporate candidate shoved down our throats again for the fourth time (Hilary, Biden, Kamala, and I guess Newsom)

We can't wait, our problems are too large in this country. We need significant changes, fdr level.

If we elect another corporate candidate then our fate is sealed, pretty much proves magas point and we leave room for fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Khari@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

I sincerely hope democrats do not spend another 4 years playing to the center and failing to prosecute or reform. I was satisfied with Biden on most issues at the time. He was better for unions than Obama. In retrospect- Biden was not a good candidate because he led back to Trump's second term. What kind of future would Newsom bring in 2032?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 11 points 1 week ago

When the governor launched his podcast “This Is Gavin Newsom” a year ago, he began warmly showcasing extremist bigots by featuring Charlie Kirk as his first guest. And when Kirk was assassinated in September, Newsom lavished praise on him. “The best way to honor Charlie’s memory,” he tweeted, “is to continue his work:

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
431 points (100.0% liked)

politics

28580 readers
2083 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS