572
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 144 points 2 months ago

Team expects, may be useful, could be used, prototype, are currently investigating and so on. Cool piece of technolgy, but no even mention when they'd expect that to be commercially available, if it's even possible to manufacture in commercial scale. Like many other new battery chemistries and technologies, it shows promise and makes a good headline, but at this point that's pretty much it.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 59 points 2 months ago

Eh, give em the clout they need to develop it further.

[-] ElectricAirship@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 months ago

Well tbf this was a university lab which isn't focused on commercial production but just trying to prove their experiments

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] suigenerix@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago

To be fair, commercial long-life nickel-iron batteries are already being sold for grid storage. The main reason they aren't used more widely is they cost more up front.

That's ok, because they still cost less than alternatives over the full life span of the battery.

The risk is that the higher purchase cost required will likely be wasted as new battery tech surpasses it long before its life is over.

So for now, it's all about weighing opportunity cost, tech lock-in, and early obsolescence

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Reygle@lemmy.world 87 points 2 months ago

We've been seeing claims like this for years and every time it's been total bullshit. 99.9% chance it is this time as well, but enjoy the thought experiment.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 46 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And yet we have somehow gone from rechargeable phone batteries that were about 3 times bigger than the phone I'm typing this on and had a capacity of about 500 mAh to where we are now with the battery that powers my phone being some small part of it and having a capacity of 3000 mAh, with only two major technology changes on the way. Meanwhile, we've been using the same technology for over a decade and the capability keeps getting better. I wonder why that is?

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Those while are great are just pushing the tech in tiny increments. It's still the same tech. Kinda like how ICE vehicles got better and better, but they still use non-renewable energy.

This tech we need, is the leap from ICE to electric vehicles...vs an old model T to a modern Corolla.

[-] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 16 points 2 months ago

An order of magnitude more power in the same form factor in 30 years isn't a tiny increment. It was certainly a number of tiny increments to get there. And for those big leaps you're so desperately looking for, it isn't one little group sitting down together thinking how they're going to do something. There are decades of research building out a number of tiny discoveries, combined by a group at an opportune time to put it all together so everyone can talk about this momentous leap that they, from the outside perceived as something new that sprung out of nothing.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] gwl 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sometimes it's not pure bullshit, but instead intentionally misses details

Like articles going "new battery lasts 1000 years in one charge!" - which is true of Nuclear Batteries, because they give basically a maximum of 1 watt of energy per hour. (Which is useful for very specific purposes like a pacemaker)

[-] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Are you saying Grandma’s a WMD?

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

Careful, 'Murica is gonna invade your grandma to bring democracy to her organs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

The problem is that batteries must meet a whole set of other criteria as well to be competitive, for example cost and energy density. If they are not mentioned, they are probably worse in that aspect. Which just means they are still useful for some applications, just maybe not for cars, laptops or cellphones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

yep.

SHould be a blanket ban on miraculous battery technology stories until they are actually in production and proven.

Cause lets face it, if one of these miracle batteries using cheap, common materials with amazing capacity and longevity was real, it wouldnt take long for companies to jump on them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 54 points 2 months ago

However, this technology does not yet match the energy density of lithium-ion batteries.

It would be good if you actually told us what that energy density is...

[-] InnerScientist@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

Technically, a copper wire is a battery that charges in (a very tiny fraction of ) seconds.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Two important parts of a battery are how much energy it can store in a certain space and how much it weighs. If it is bigger and holds the same amount of energy that might be ok for a non mobile storage if it costs less, like a house. If it weighs more for a certain energy that wouldn't be useful for cars and mobile things but might be ok for small things where the weight is negligible anyway. For cars you want a small energy dense battery that is light as possible

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago

Abstract

Downsizing metal nanoparticles into nanoclusters and single atoms represents a transformative approach to maximizing atom utilization efficiency for energy applications. Herein, a bovine serum albumin-templated synthetic strategy is developed to fabricate iron and nickel nanoclusters, which are subsequently hydrothermally composited with graphene oxide. Through KOH-catalyzed pyrolysis, the downsized metal nanoclusters and single atoms are embedded in a hierarchically porous protein/graphene-derived carbonaceous aerogel framework. The carbon-supported Fe subnanoclusters (FeSNC) as the negative electrode and Ni subnanoclusters (NiSNC) as the positive electrode exhibit remarkable specific capacitance (capacity) values of 373 F g−1 (93 mAh g−1) and 1125 F g−1 (101 mAh g−1) at 1.0 A g−1, respectively. Assembled into a supercapacitor-battery hybrid configuration, the device achieves an excellent specific energy (47 W h kg−1) and superior specific power (18 kW kg−1), while maintaining outstanding cycling stability of over 12 000 cycles. Moreover, FeSNCs displayed a significantly reduced oxygen evolution overpotential (η10 = 270 mV), outperforming the RuO2 benchmark (η10 = 328 mV). Molecular dynamics simulations, coupled with density functional theory calculations, offer insights into the dynamic behavior and electronic properties of these materials. This work underscores the immense potential of metallic subnanoclusters for advancing next-generation energy storage and conversion technologies.

[-] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 months ago

Article says 47 Wh/kg. Thats around a third of LFP cells. But the power density is way higher. Meaning it can do enormous peak currents.

For grid energy storage, energy density is not the most important factor, but the power density is a great plus. It means these cells can rapidly charge or discharge in the grid, offering flexibility to buffer in any way that is required. And the cycle life is also way higher.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

The technology uses nickel and iron clusters smaller than 5 nanometers, meaning 10,000 to 20,000 clusters could fit within the width of a human hair. 

By using these dimensions, the researchers increased the electrode surface area, allowing almost every atom to participate in the chemical reaction. This efficiency enables the battery to reach a full charge in seconds rather than the seven hours required by historical versions of the technology.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 months ago

5nm nano fabrication will cost a fortune. this week's cure-all battery.

[-] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 28 points 2 months ago

Nano chemistry is entirely different from nano fabrication. I haven't read the paper but most materials like this are made by mixing chemicals in a beaker and/or heating them in a furnace.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that's exactly what they do. You can click through to the original article and then the paper abstract if you want, but yeah they mix graphene and protein and heat it.

[-] DeuxChevaux@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago

If it lasts 30 years, it will not fly with the industry and the concept of planned obsolescence.

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

Ooh, they'll figure a way to make it clock out on the last monthly payment. One little chip will do, or just a few lines of code in the right place.

[-] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Someone will find a way to make it a subscription service that stops working when a certain MW is exceeded

[-] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 months ago

We are heading for a subscription LIFE.

Did you ever see the movie THX 1138 (1971)?

The police stop chasing him when his "value to society" runs out.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 8 points 2 months ago

Then a new player will become dominant in the industry.

[-] prex@aussie.zone 6 points 2 months ago

My solar panels have a 25 year warranty.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 months ago

Is it also a room-temperature superconductor and a dessert topping?

[-] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

After 12,000 cycles it breaks down into rainbow sprinkles

[-] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

Well maybe this time the new battery tech can be real and gay!

[-] roserose56@lemmy.zip 26 points 2 months ago

So the inventor gonna vanish and never hear about it again?

[-] HertzDentalBar 6 points 2 months ago

Well Edison is dead, but we do hear about him alot so I'm not sure what's going on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

And probably not at all practical.

[-] satanmat@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Eeehhhhh — yeah

Aerogel. So not gonna be good for mobile applications— cars etc.

But might be workable for static applications????

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 25 points 2 months ago

So a 3 megawatt charger can charge 50 kWh in one minute. That's some serious power.

[-] WhisperingEye@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Call me pessimistic but I'm guessing this is only time we'll be hearing about it

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

NIckel Iron is fantastic without any revolutionary improvements. Batteries made 100 years ago still work today. They are large and heavy so are only of use for home power.

The big "down side" which is the reason it isn't commercially developed at large scale is that they last forever. No investors are going to give billions to a business that can't generate revenue forever with a product that needs replacing every 3 years.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 months ago

the device achieves an excellent specific energy (47 W h kg−1) and superior specific power (18 kW kg−1)

I'm not familiar with this stuff. How does that compare to popular lithium batteries?

[-] pageflight@piefed.social 21 points 2 months ago

comparison

Looks like it's more like NiMH than LiPo, but higher power than NiMH (which I guess lines up with their claims of charging super fast).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Poorly. According to a random Wikipedia query, commodity lithium ion is ~270 Wh per kilogram. So this is around 20% of that, according to the above.

"Excellent" may be in comparison to other byzantine specialty battery chemistries, but lithium ion remains resolutely enthroned.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

It might be cool for storing solar energy for your home, though. We don't need to always carry the battery in every use case

[-] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago

Nickel iron is typically used for off grid solar energy storage. Weight doesn't matter at all since the battery won't be moved. The most important thing is lifetime. Traditional nickel iron batteries last for decades and can be refurbished.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Most li-ions land around 120-160 W-h /kg. So much poorer, but much cheaper on density

The specific power (power density) is kind of crazy though. I think most li-ions top out around 10kW/kg, any more and they will overheat and boil their electrolyte which usually leads to fire.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago

Abstract

Downsizing metal nanoparticles into nanoclusters and single atoms represents a transformative approach to maximizing atom utilization efficiency for energy applications. Herein, a bovine serum albumin-templated synthetic strategy is developed to fabricate iron and nickel nanoclusters, which are subsequently hydrothermally composited with graphene oxide. Through KOH-catalyzed pyrolysis, the downsized metal nanoclusters and single atoms are embedded in a hierarchically porous protein/graphene-derived carbonaceous aerogel framework. The carbon-supported Fe subnanoclusters (FeSNC) as the negative electrode and Ni subnanoclusters (NiSNC) as the positive electrode exhibit remarkable specific capacitance (capacity) values of 373 F g−1 (93 mAh g−1) and 1125 F g−1 (101 mAh g−1) at 1.0 A g−1, respectively. Assembled into a supercapacitor-battery hybrid configuration, the device achieves an excellent specific energy (47 W h kg−1) and superior specific power (18 kW kg−1), while maintaining outstanding cycling stability of over 12 000 cycles. Moreover, FeSNCs displayed a significantly reduced oxygen evolution overpotential (η10 = 270 mV), outperforming the RuO2 benchmark (η10 = 328 mV). Molecular dynamics simulations, coupled with density functional theory calculations, offer insights into the dynamic behavior and electronic properties of these materials. This work underscores the immense potential of metallic subnanoclusters for advancing next-generation energy storage and conversion technologies.

[-] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Herein, a bovine serum albumin-templated synthetic strategy is developed to fabricate iron and nickel nanoclusters, which are subsequently hydrothermally composited with graphene oxide.

Is this how Doom starts?

[-] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

I think so long as you don't hear Mick Gordon guitar riffs starting to chug in the background we are safe....

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2026
572 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
4582 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS