Reminder their constitution doesn't allow elections during war, for good reason - how tf are you supposed to vote when you're being bombed?
"Zelensky won't break the law."
Yeah that was the law when he was elected. People keep acting like it's the same as America, but here it's the opposite. Politicians should follow election laws both in letter and in spirit
Note that some days ago FT published an article titled " Zelenskyy planning elections in Ukraine and vote on peace deal".
Which timeline is this... 24 hours after Trump gets elected? Or the too weak two weeks when Trump was supposed to get Putin to agree to a ceasefire? US needs to get its house in order.
Love a permanent state of exception.
Russia can end that state whenever they want.
It's called being invaded and by definition, yea, it's kind of exceptional.
User tags are great for knowing who to ignore.

Yours is much politer than mine!
How to user tag???
Might be different on different apps but generally click on the options dropdown on a comment (report/block/share etc.) and there should be an add user tag option.
It's called dictatorship
Oh, so then you should also be firmly against the russian dictatorship overseeing the aggressive invasion against Ukraine's territorial sovereignty, right? ...right?
Fun fact: the original meaning of a dictatorship was precisely the case where the Romans extraordinarily appointed someone to have full authority to resolve a specific problem, such as when a serious threat the the state was present.
The Ukrainian constitution says no elections while war. Zelensky does not hold any dictatorial authority beyond the one given to him by the Ukrainian people and laws when he was elected.
If you are going to be mad at someone for straining Ukrainian democracy, be mad at the country invading it, and thus triggering the suspension of elections.
Romans extraordinarily appointed someone to have full authority to resolve a specific problem, such as when a serious threat the the state was present.
And how'd that work out?
The Ukrainian constitution says no elections while war.
While in a state of martial law. A constitution re-written as recently as 2015, the year following Ukrainian Oligarch Petro Poroshenko's ascension to power.
You're witnessing the end stages of the collapse of democracy in the country under a set of rules authorized barely a decade ago.
And how’d that work out?
Given that the Roman Republic lasted for something like 480 years (509 – 27 BC) ? Pretty damn well thank you very much, that's a longer lifespan that any of our current republics (minus San Marino I guess).
While in a state of martial law. A constitution re-written as recently as 2015, the year following Ukrainian Oligarch Petro Poroshenko’s ascension to power. You’re witnessing the end stages of the collapse of democracy in the country under a set of rules authorized barely a decade ago.
Why is martial law currently in effect buddy? Can you think of anything that would guarantee the immediate revocation of martial law? Anything? Any ideas?
Given that the Roman Republic lasted for something like 480 years
Half a millennia of near endless military conquests and civil wars. What's not to love?
Why is martial law currently in effect buddy?
Because your liberal reformists consolidated enormous powers in the executive branch. Again.
You keep giving governments the ability to end elections and entrench themselves indefinitely. That's exactly what it will do, every time.
Half a millennia of near endless military conquests and civil wars. What’s not to love?
You changed the subject.
Because your liberal reformists consolidated enormous powers in the executive branch. Again. You keep giving governments the ability to end elections and entrench themselves indefinitely. That’s exactly what it will do, every time.
What a ridiculous thing to write in the context of this discussion. Martial law was not enacted via self-coup. The Ukrainian executive did not wake up one nice morning, realize it had some kewl powers and thought let's enact martial law so that we can entrench ourselves. It was enacted when a foreign power invaded. It will be revoked the moment Russian soldiers return the fuck back to Russia.
Martial law was not enacted via self-coup.
Martial Law was written into the Constitution by a billionaire Oligarch and his corrupt friends, specifically so he could leverage the fighting in the Donbas to secure his position indefinitely.
The Ukrainian executive did not wake up one nice morning, realize it had some kewl powers and thought let’s enact martial law
He needed an excuse to consolidate power, just like every other successful dictator.
What a devious plotter! He made Russia invade his country so that he could become a dictator. Genius!
Hold the line, Zelenskiy!!
TRUMP IS GOING TO "KNIFE" YOU IN THE BACK, SHORTLY, WITH PUTIN.
Hold the line!!
( :
_ /\ _
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link