762

The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records.

The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

Archive: http://archive.today/gfTg9

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 249 points 3 months ago

This news sparks joy. It’s a shame the FBI is wasting their time on petty political bullshit like this instead of going after real crime. What a shameful chapter for the FBI, and that’s really saying something given their illustrious history.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 87 points 3 months ago

You act like there's a cabal of kid rapist running the world.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 months ago

The "funny" thing is that anybody thinking that a mere 5 years ago would have been deemed a conspiracy nutter.

[-] bampop@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

That's not by accident. Every right wing conspiracy is a ridiculous pastiche of the shit they are really getting up to, or intend to in the near future. No doubt Pizzagate was invented to make people incredulous about claims of secret cabals of kid rapists in elite circles. Every accusation a confession.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago

Every accusation [is] a confession

That is indeed something which has been very visibly and very often proven, again and again and again, in the last couple of years.

I reckon it was always so, but we just forgot it during the period after WWII and the ressurging of the far-right.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sundray@lemmus.org 66 points 3 months ago

If they had any decency at all they should be arresting the president.

But hell would need to freeze over first. 😡

[-] unphazed@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

They did that, twice. Even got a trial and 34 felonies. Repercussions? None. Honestly if you do your job and not only see nothing come of it but said felon has an impact on your job now I can sympathize a bit.

[-] deHaga@feddit.uk 11 points 3 months ago

He would have been fucked if he had lost the election, and money won the election, money and the markets is the only thing Trump cares about.

Scott Galloway has the right idea

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/02/02/business/video/national-protests-immigration-trump-administration-lead-jake-tapper

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Smoogs@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

Right!?

Like ohhh. So important to see if someone liked a post. Meanwhile tech espionage and terrorists take over the world.

How dare we 'radicalize' over the idea of free Healthcare.

Absolute sham of 'protection'.

[-] enterpries@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 months ago

Social contract is breaking.

No need to see any legitimacy in this government or its goons.

[-] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Honestly I don't even believe this stuff anymore. I feel like our government would set up shit just to make it look like they don't have as much control as they really do.

Just a nice little theater act to try to make people think privacy can still be a thing.

[-] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Always, always default to the simplest answer being the most likely to be true. In context, the government is too incompetent to manage such a thing.

[-] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s really great, isn’t it? But I’d leave you with one theoretical angle to consider…

What if the FBI actually did get into the phone? If so, then why would this information have been made public?

The only reason why, that I can think of right now, is that the FBI wants more people using Lockout. If so, the only reason I can possibly imagine for that is—there are actually some good commonly available techniques to keep them out of your devices, of which Lockout is insufficient. They’d want more people assuming that it is sufficient, and this news could accomplish that.

Purely theoretical… but the bigger point here, whether that framing is strategically true or miraculously over-thinking things, is that something does work. No matter what, you know something works.

[-] Truscape 17 points 3 months ago

I don't think that's a rational line of thinking, because there are documented filings of attempted file access into FOSS programs that the FBI are unable to influence and are completely unable to access, such as Veracrypt/LUKS encrypted PCs and GrapheneOS in BFU/Duress password entry status.

Now, Apple is indeed a proprietary ecosystem, and as such unable to have community outside assurances that their system is completely trustworthy. However, Lockdown has now joined the ranks of other systems of data security that have been proven effective against a warrant, perpetuating the cycle in which nations such as the UK (and the US during the Crypto Wars) have tried to overtly undermine the technology through public actions after failures to covertly crack them. You cannot classify mathematics, physics, or cryptography, and there is no such thing as a perfect backdoor (despite some senators' opinions).

With all that being said, I still wouldn't trust an iPhone, but I don't think that proposed line of thinking meshes with the FBI.

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

It’s not like it was a press release, it was gleaned from a court document. I suppose they could be happy with what info they got off of it enough to let this prosecution fail if they can follow up the chain, but I’m still skeptical. Who knows, maybe they have a functional quantum computer they don’t want to advertise

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 104 points 3 months ago

Best advertisement I've heard for an iPhone ever. Now that Android moving to the same walled garden business model...

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 93 points 3 months ago

GrapheneOS is ~10x more private and secure than iOS.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 150 points 3 months ago

I want a phone, not a hobby.

[-] Attacker94@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago

Discounting some minor comparability issues, the process just requires a computer, an internet connection, a cable, and the ability to read through a couple paragraphs of instruction.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 47 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm talking about daily use. I have a good friend, we've both been computer nerds since The Apple II era, we both used to put custom roms on our android phones, we're avid self hosters, etc... He recently switched to Graphene and wants to switch back to something that's less of a pain. His complaints are pretty much the same as reasons I haven't switched. I warned him it would be an adjustment.

[-] napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org 33 points 3 months ago

As someone who uses GrapheneOS with sandboxed GooglePlay on his only smartphone (with daily usage for years at this point): I don't know what kind of adjustment you are referring to. I never had to adjust to anything, because I never encountered anything that GrapheneOS couldn't do that stock Android could. Follow the installation process and after that the phone behaves like a regular phone, except you have way more options regarding security and privacy.

Is your friend trying to use GrapheneOS without any Google services maybe?

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 months ago

I had to fiddle with some stuff to get the Google location history and Android Auto working. But if you're using it for privacy-from-Google purposes you probably don't care about those.

load more comments (10 replies)

My own personal experience over the past year with it has... Largely not lined up with that? The install process was easy, I do have gplay enabled but rarely use it, favoring fdroid, and it's... Been fine? It's felt mostly like stock android tbh

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not a hobby.

Don't confuse Graphene with a tinker box, or some ROM you once rooted.

It's a professionally polished and very secure fork of Android.

There are some minor limitations with a handful apps that can't pass their Google specific internal security checks, but there's lists of them that you can check to see if any are a deal breaker for you.

[-] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

I've used GOS daily for years. Your characterization of the OS as a "hobby" could not be further from the truth. After some basic initial configuration, it simply works like any other phone. My bank app works. Every app they told me would not work, works fine. Honestly, I'm beginning to wonder if all this FUD is a result of personal lack of willingness to do the research or something more nefarious like intentional misinformation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] StitchInTime@piefed.social 23 points 3 months ago

Well well well, look who likes using banking apps and tap-to-pay.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Truscape 22 points 3 months ago

Safely using an insecure device swiftly becomes a hobby, unless you give in to the default experience.

I installed GrapheneOS, installed my apps, and I'm done. If I want to deny telemetry or to set up something like the duress password, it's one to two taps.

iPhone users, man... stop drinking the fucking punch.

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I'm not an iPhone user. I don't own an Apple anything and really despise them as a company. Stop making stupid assumptions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Up voting because you made be lol, not because I agree with you. Been on GOS for over a year, it's not that bad. A few apps don't work, it's only slightly inconvenient.

[-] Ulrich@feddit.org 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's not what you said. But since you did, it's very easy to install and use. No hobby required.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hateisreality@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Graphene OS

[-] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 months ago

Android phones have lockdown mode too. Hold the power button to show the shutdown menu and click lockdown.

phone screenshot

[-] BanMe@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

They're not the same. Android lockdown is a temporary lock screen state. iOS lockdown is a full OS hardening, affects the way the phone operates full-time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] lautan@lemmy.ca 49 points 3 months ago

The FBI just wants the public to think their phone is secure. I got news for you, it's not secure. Look up Snowden.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Reminder that none of your data is safe on a cloud. Law enforcement can get a judge to sign off and make Google/Apple decrypt your cloud data and give it to them.

If you really want your data private you have to put it on an encrypted hard drive. Recommend Veracrypt.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] enterpries@sh.itjust.works 42 points 3 months ago

Stop requiring accounts just to view content.

Fucking scumbags

[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

One shortcoming of lockdown mode, as far as I can tell: you can pair your phone and watch so locking your phone will lock your watch as well, but you can’t do the reverse. It seems more likely that a hostile party would get access to your phone first while you still (temporarily) have control of your watch, so being able to lock your phone from your watch would be extremely useful. (Or for that matter, set lockdown mode to trigger automatically if your watch is removed or your watch and phone move to different locations.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Here are the instructions to enable and description of how it works. Seems really complete.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/105120

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] voidsignal@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Well, since the reporter does not really own the phone, the FBI will now turn to Apple ordering them to disable that false sentiment of security.

If you don't hold the keys, it's not encrypted.

[-] Teal@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 months ago

If a person is using lockdown mode they more than likely also have Advanced Data Protection enabled. This removes iCloud keys on Apple’s side and is only stored on device.

In that case you hold the keys and it’s encrypted.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 months ago

And if you don't think there are backdoors then I have a bridge to sell you.

The best you can hope for in any case is increased friction. Because if you have pissed off a government org to the point they declare you an actual national security threat.. you start realizing why israel et al tend to be known to have tools that can crack a few generations back.

Which is why journalists, when they talk about stuff like this, are pretty adamant that they don't trust those devices at all. One of the more common tactics is to have completely separate devices for sensitive communication that are kept physically isolated from any of their personal devices... and preferably in a place that a trusted associate knows about. If someone gets taken away in a black van? Someone else goes for a walk with a power drill for no apparent reason at all.

[-] Teal@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 months ago

Well those back doors don’t seem to be working in the actual case happening currently. What you’re saying is assumptions.

Also you’re the second commenter today to say they have a bridge to sell me. Is this old saying making a comeback or is it bots?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Dunno what this has to do with the Ginza Apple Store. The intern just used the first stock photo they could find, I guess.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

they’ll just pay israelis (cellbrite) to crack it

[-] Paper_Soldier@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 months ago

I tried GrapheneOS on my Pixel, and it's pretty cool, but unfortunately I want my phone to have full functionality. I'll sacrifice some privacy and just practice digital minimalism, which ultimately is the best form of privacy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
762 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84534 readers
3566 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS