209
submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BaronVonBort@lemmy.world 38 points 2 years ago

Wait, how much money does the Catholic Church have?

[-] Fetus@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Between 1980 and 2015, The catholic church paid over $275 million of compensation to victims of child sexual abuse in Australia.

In the US, they spent over $300 million on costs related to clergy abuse. In one year.

To put that into perspective, imaging earning minimum wage in the US, full time hours. Now imaging working for 50 years, saving every single cent you make. You haven't earnt enough to cover a single day of those costs.

All in all, http://www.bishop-accountability.org claim that the church has paid about $4 billion on child sexual abuse cases. This doesn't include the money they spent moving paedophiles around the world so that they can continue to abuse kids.

But we may never know how much money the church really has, because they are actively hiding assets to minimise their value, in an attempt to limit the amount they have to pay to the victims of their crimes.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

Hot damn. 4 billion total so far and its probably them trying hard paying as little as possible. So thats got to be like what, 1-5% of what they actually possess?

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

More than God...

[-] Zron@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Do you want that figure in tons of nazi gold or tons of stolen artifacts?

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago

You and your org lost control of the rich class a long time ago, organized religion is just for the commoners these days. You have no power here, the stock market has taken them fully.

[-] DankMemeMachine@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

They don't have to tell the whole world, just the very very small percentage of people doing a majority of the damage.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Animal agriculture is currently using an amount of land that's the equivalent of the entirety of North America.

[-] DankMemeMachine@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Yeah but people need food, people don't need hundreds of flights on a private jet each year. One problem is easier to solve than the other so we should start there.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

Animal agriculture uses more food than it produces. You need to feed the animals and the meat they produce is considerably less food than what they consumed.

[-] hh93@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Noone is forcing anyone to eat meat or fly

Sure the 0,1% polluting 1000 times as much as average people is really shitty but just cutting their emissions down will not solve the problem

Making huge changes among the population is necessary, too.

Obviously you need to tackle the rich, too, in order to get the population on your side but for laws to happen you also need a decent part of the population already agreeing with that law and living by it.

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Too little too late. We're all fucked.

[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

He needs to excommunicate leaders that don't pass sweeping legislation. He won't but that would be the only way to force their hand.

[-] eee@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

The rich, on their private jets: "can't hear you, too busy eating caviar"

this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
209 points (100.0% liked)

News

31269 readers
2675 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS