273
submitted 2 years ago by Mint@lemmy.one to c/196

Ai Generated image of a parking lot with a KFC that is mid-explosion and a chicken being launched by said explosion, image captured by what looks like a CCTV

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

The sign being correct is actually impressive. How many iterations did you go through?

[-] Mint@lemmy.one 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

None for the text, Dall'e 3 for the most part tends to nail text, and I would say most of the time, it get text right that you specifically ask for.

So say if you ask for Pepsi most of the time the text will eligible with maybe some oddities at worst, but if you ask for something general like "Magazine cover" and not specify the text that should be on there, it will likely be unlegible.

Though in the case of Pepsi because it is a brand with ton of photos I assume its easier for it to nail, where as say if I asked for a sign with "x" text it out of the four images one or two will be legible, and the more text you will put the more likely for it to be nonsensical.

[-] solinus@lemmy.cafe 3 points 2 years ago

the advancement of technology never ceases to amaze and frighten me

[-] camr_on@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Really cool. I didn't expect ai to make so much progress on text in images so quickly. I'll have to go play around with it

[-] SkyeStarfall 3 points 2 years ago

Isn't dalle-3 actually good at text now?

[-] TheBlue22 26 points 2 years ago
[-] Mint@lemmy.one 17 points 2 years ago

[Created using Bing Create which is currently using Dall'e 3]

[-] atocci@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago

It's using 3 now? That's the one that can correctly generate text then huh?

[-] Mint@lemmy.one 10 points 2 years ago

Yes for the most part it can correctly do text. Mind you it isn't the first one to be released that is able to do text DeepFloydIf , if I'm not mistaken is the first generator to be released that can do text - but not many use it.

[-] Gruntyfish@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Here's one I got with the same prompt. I'm pretty impressed by the results actually.

[-] toodd 9 points 2 years ago

tweaked for some analog effect

[-] Mint@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That wasn't the prompt I used I just put what is happening in the image description the funny thing is the prompt I had the chicken was just standing there, but Dall'e made it get blasted by the explosion the prompt I used is:

"a blurry, low quality, overexposed, dark-visiblity compression grain of a cctv footage of a chicken standing outside of a KFC that is mid-explosion, the KFC logo is clearly visible and the chicken is in frame, the KFC is being exploded from the inside out"

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Heh it actually spelled KFC correctly and didn't do something like KFC8dot

[-] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In Chinese, explosions and frying are the same (炸). So this image has a pun in it.

[-] Mint@lemmy.one 3 points 2 years ago

Huh, interesting. Mind you it was accidental pun then.

[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 5 points 2 years ago

You don't fuck with the Colonel

[-] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Oh, that's a chicken. This image makes more sense now.

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The beginning of an era of poultry terrorism.

[-] mihnt@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Nice name, OP.

[-] cobra89@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago
[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

So I was wondering why the chicken in the air seemed to be getting bigger and bigger. Then it hit me...

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
273 points (100.0% liked)

196

17500 readers
1313 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS