885
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

More than a hundred dolphins have been found dead in the Brazilian Amazon amid an historic drought and record-high water temperatures that in places have exceeded 102 degrees Fahrenheit [38.8 °C].

The dead dolphins were all found in Lake Tefé over the past seven days, according to the Mamirauá Institute, a research facility funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Science.

The institute said such a high number of deaths was unusual and suggested record-high lake temperatures and an historic drought in the Amazon may have been the cause.

The news is likely to add to the concerns of climate scientists over the effects human activity and extreme droughts are having on the region.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Seraph@kbin.social 187 points 11 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 171 points 11 months ago

If we stopped the economy and stopped all emissions worldwide, this progression would still occur for more than 2 decades.

This is just the beginning for stuff we did since y2k.

By the time we actually make serious change, it will be far too late.

Happy Sunday. Enjoy football.

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 30 points 11 months ago

Don't invest in the future, don't have kids. Be here for a good time not a long time. Fuck the world.

[-] GreatBlueHeron@lemmy.ca 15 points 11 months ago

That's kinda where I'm at, but I already have kids, and now they're having kids. I worry about them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 19 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sad part is we've more or less figured out on paper how to cut our emissions while retaining a fairly high quality of life. Not perfect obviously and we'll lose a lot of the amenities people in developed countries have gotten used to, but to say the path to sustainability is uncharted is simply not true, and it could have been implemented 20 years ago, it can also be implemented today. But it would require gutting the wealth of the rich, totally overhauling the economy, government, and society as a whole, and everyone from all socioeconomic statuses agreeing that it should be done. So it's basically impossible under capitalism. Most of the upper class/upper middle class people in the West won't even entertain the idea of not owning a car, living in an apartment, or cutting out meat from their diets, let alone the radical changes needed for our species to actually be sustainable.

[-] TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago

I'm surprised that there isn't an open source guide on how to be an effective eco terrorist and what the most vulnerable global chock points are. People have gone to war over less.

[-] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 months ago

Oh there are some out there just the people who want to go to war over this are poor

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

2 decades is likely optimistic. 5 is probably more likely. that said at what point do we just reach absolute nihilism and just stop giving a fuck. We're well past the point of no return. Our emissions are still INCREASING despite knowledge that it's going to destroy the liveable planet as we currently know it causing mass extinction events.

If we don't have any sense of urgency at this point, I can't see it starting anytime soon.

Everyday we delay we make it worse. what's worse than catastrophic?

I'll point out we did have a brief decline in emissions during covid and in 2009 during GFC but that was accidental becuse people stopped spending and travelling.

[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 17 points 11 months ago

By the time we actually make serious change, it will be far too late.

Optimistic of you to assume that we will ever make serious change.

[-] matter@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago

We will, one way or another. At some point simply enough people will have died that we will stop making things meaningfully worse 🤷‍♂️

[-] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago

What also worries me is that there's a lot of talk about the environment collapsing in a century; however, given how things are going, I'm starting to suspect these people are seeing exponential change and slapping on a more linear approximation to predict what will happen. No one really knows what's going to happen, but we do know that it's happening right now and all we can do is try to protect what's left from the absolutely moronic shitheads that have their heads so far up their ass they look almost normal until they start speaking.

[-] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

If we stopped the economy and stopped all emissions worldwide, this progression would still occur for more than 2 decades.

The economy did basically stop for a month in March 2020, and pollution dropped incredibly.

Change is possible. We just don't want it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 48 points 11 months ago

It's too bad there isn't some huge forest somewhere that would be a big carbon sink and help stop the river from getting so warm. I hear there used to be though...

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't want the rainforest to be deforested, but it's kinda fucked up to tell all the South American countries covered in trees they aren't able to do exactly what Europe did. Most of Europe used to be covered in trees 200+ years ago and they deforested it all for industrialization and profit. America cleared untold amounts of fields for farming and building suburbs. Just because this was done before global warming was a real concern we now all feel entitled to tell countries like Brazil they can't do the same. It's basically just the same old story of the west wanting to exploit the developing worlds resources for themselves all over again. Just now the resource is air.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 35 points 11 months ago

True, however letting them make the same mistakes just because America or Europe did isn't the right answer either. All 3 regions should be reforested and all push towards deforestation should be stopped.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

While I agree that it's a bit hypocritical, we didn't know what clearing those forests would do in the Renaissance and Industrial Revolution. It wasn't widely known until the post war era. Now that we do know we need to act.

But we shouldn't just tell them they can't do stuff. We should be pouring massive amounts of money into helping them skip over coal, farm vertically, and get away from slash and burn farming.

There's more we can do than just tell them they're being bad.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Ya, the whole issue is there's almost zero willingness to help them economically to avoid deforestation. It's much cheaper to just tell them not to and that it's bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Happenchance@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

It's almost like, we as a global entity, need to provide these countries with the resources to protect their environment and still prosper.

[-] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

But the billionaires are buying carbon offsets when they fly around on their private jets. Surely that's doing the trick right? There's no way that entire concept is a scam and doesn't do anything.

[-] naalo@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

I understand what you're saying, but why is there so little replanting everywhere?

[-] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

And from what I've read, replanting projects sponsored by the timber industry, planting all pine trees six feet apart, created the ideal setting for massive wildfires. I may have the details wrong but that was the gist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

I don't remember telling anyone to do anything...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] SusheeMonster@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago

Kinda ironic that Amazon.com is killing its namesake through its carbon footprint

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

They are playing by Highlander rules. There can be only one.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago
[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Ma'am, this is so horrible. I don't even know what to say anymore.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Child of the future: ... Grandfather ... what's a USA?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grue@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

On the bright side, Amazon river dolphins are "only" endangered, as opposed to possibly extinct, like some other river dolphins.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


More than a hundred dolphins have been found dead in the Brazilian Amazon amid an historic drought and record-high water temperatures that in places have exceeded 102 degrees Fahrenheit.

The dead dolphins were all found in Lake Tefé over the past seven days, according to the Mamirauá Institute, a research facility funded by the Brazilian Ministry of Science.

The institute said such a high number of deaths was unusual and suggested record-high lake temperatures and an historic drought in the Amazon may have been the cause.

Researchers and activists are trying to rescue surviving dolphins by transferring them from lagoons and ponds in the outskirts to the main body of the river where the water is cooler, reported CNN Brasil, but the operation is not easy due to the remoteness of the area.

Below average levels of water have been reported in 59 municipalities in Amazonas State, impeding both transport and fishing activities on the river.

Authorities expect even more acute droughts over the next couple of weeks, which could result in further deaths of dolphins, CNN Brasil reported.


The original article contains 332 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 46%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
885 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38583 readers
1546 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS