270
This sets an alarming precedent where a sitting us president can kidnap the acting head of another country (elected or not) which is an act of war, without the us being at war or having authorization from congress.
see the logic is only the US can, anybody else cant even arrest netanyahu when he flies over their airspace cuz for some reason that would also be an act of war towards the US
You seem to not understand the term precedent. Neither is that a new thing to do for the US nor is it actually requiring congress authorisation. They gave up that power long ago and now don't need to autorise anything for up to 90 days.
Also the US has not declared war once since WW2... They actually set the precedent for "military operations" and -again- not recently either.
I already hate 2026
It's going to be worse than 2025..
Americans did nothing and things got worse. Who could have foreseen this?
So alcoholism it is.
Guys, it's fine. Remember? Trump has the FIFA peace price.
Where's the problem? No winner of the FIFA peace price has started less and ended more wars than Trump. 😉
load more comments
(1 replies)
I'm starting to thing the Fifa Peace Prize may not actually mean very much...
so you're telling me the "peace president" started another war? Unpossible. /s
He's gonna go to war in Venezuela to stop people from talking about him in the epstein files
No, he did it for money. USA is a agressor.
Both.
I like that line of thinking as much as the next guy, but it strikes me as wildly misguided that the US politics has reduced to that. Like, I get the symbolic aspects of the Epstein's files for politics, but still think it is mindless engagement.
An indisputably genuine video of Trump raping a literal toddler could be released tomorrow and nothing would change. Their support base and the gears of power are already too deeply entwined to his personality. No amount of public rage or national indignation changes governments.
Maduro is just as bad as Trump or Putin. Still it sets a very bad precedent when the US starts acting like Russia. Who will be next?
It doesn't matter how bad Maduro is, this is wrong and illegal. Period.
Idk I think if he was literally Hitler or worse it could be justified.
But he wasn't and isn't, so it's for sure wrong and unjustified.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Just follow the unexploited oil reserves
Mexico, according to Trump.
I'm skeptical though, since Mexico doesn't famously have huge reserves of oil. Still, he does really hate brown people, so that might be enough.
Canada, Mexico.
It's not like we this is the USAs first rodeo
load more comments
(3 replies)
Okay now do Putin. I'll wait....
Oh no. Ukraine attacked his house and that crossed a serious line.
There are rules of decency in this world
“Attacked.”
load more comments
(1 replies)
They will kidnap Zelensky before Putin.
Looks like the USA managed to buy the local army or something. Well, it went unexpectedly smoothly. Maduro really didn't look like the elected president. Not sure if USA puppet would be better though...
Not sure if USA puppet would be better though...
Depends on how much money you have invested in American oil companies
He wasn't elected, he just denied the results of the election
That’s usually the kind of thing that gets you on trumps good side though
I read that the US was offering a $50 million bounty for anyone who provided info that led to his arrest
All eyes on Taiwan next…
ALL of these mother fuckers are going to be tried, convicted, and sentenced.
Respectfully, I think you mean "should be". Nothing has happened to make me believe that any of these fuckers will be held accountable for their bullshit.
That's cute. They won't.
load more comments
(3 replies)
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
270 points (100.0% liked)
News
37565 readers
1614 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS