597
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A first-of-its kind law requiring a minimum wage for app-based delivery workers will take effect after a judge rejected the companies' bid to block it.

Uber, DoorDash and Grubhub won’t be able to get out of paying minimum wage to their New York City delivery workers after all, following a judge’s decision to reject their bid to skirt the city’s new law. The upcoming law, which is still pending due to the companies’ ongoing lawsuit, aims to secure better wage protections for app-based workers. Once the suit settles, third-party delivery providers will have to pay delivery workers a minimum wage of roughly $18 per hour before tips, and keep up with the yearly increases, Reuters reports.

The amount, which will increase April 1 of every year, is slightly higher than the city’s standard minimum wage, taking into account the additional expenses gig workers face. At the moment, food delivery workers make an estimated $7-$11 per hour on average.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 69 points 1 year ago

Remember when minimum wage driver work went up for a vote in California under prop 22 and we still voted against it? Im always so mad every election cycle i feel like everyone is a complete moron working against themselves

[-] hayes_@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 year ago

Copying my own comment from another thread:

In those workers’ defense, the delivery companies spent hundreds of millions of dollars on a disinformation campaign to trick the public into thinking that voting for 22 was in their own interest.

It’s absurd that it was on the ballot in the first place.

[-] Cheesus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately corporate advertising works when it comes to elections

[-] honey_im_meat_grinding 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it fair to call people stupid when they're facing a literal corporate propaganda campaign? I'd sooner reach for "corporations are evil" than "people are stupid" in that case. Remember how people used to treat you if you were against the Iraq war? And today, we know that thing was unnecessary and awful. Sometimes powerful people just manage to convince us of things that aren't true.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

You dont have to always be the victim, dont strip away your obligation for due diligence just because some corporation made a nice commercial.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's not one or the other. The corporate propaganda works because people are stupid.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago

I agree in so far as the human brain is pretty fucking stupid and easily "hacked." Especially when companies literally pay psychologists to get better at brain hacking.

[-] soloner@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't see how this doesn't kill business for these companies.

Edit: I'm not defending the decision not to pay people more in general. It's more about the service going away altogether because the wage cost will be passed into the customers. But if that's what you fuckers want ok. I don't live in NY so it doesn't affect me. Enjoy losing access to all your delivery services.

[-] theyseemeroland@lemmy.world 92 points 1 year ago

If you can't afford to pay your employees a fair, living wage, then you don't deserve to stay in business. Capitalism in a nutshell.

[-] pathos@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

I would say regulated capitalism in a nutshell. Raw capitalism wants to pay workers as little as possible for as much production as possible.

[-] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Capitalism requires regulation. If you don't have regulation you can only have capitalism for an incredibly short amount of time. This was all detailed in Adam Smith's book when he invented capitalism.

[-] steltek@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Lemmy seems to dream up this strawman of Capitalism while having a very rose tinted outlook on Communism. Everyone seems to miss that these are all problems with humans, not your favorite economic system.

[-] Doctorchoppedliver@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Especially if it's a service. Maybe if your service business can't generate enough revenue to pay your employees then it's a service that doesn't need to exist?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 1 year ago

I don't see why that's a problem.

[-] soloner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Normally I wouldn't give a shit. But for these P2P businesses the unit economics for the business to be profitable requires passing on that expense to the end customer.

I'm not going to pay an extra $10+ dollars or whatever for my meal when I'm already tipping, paying tax, and service charge.

So I'm saying while it sounds awesome to pay people more, in this case it will just cause these services to go away.

Everyone down voted me like I'm defending the companies, but that's not my intention. It's more that these services as they are won't exist, so everyone loses. The employees lose the job and their customers lose the service. The company goes out of business too but that's not the issue I care about. We will effectively all lose delivery services except those willing to pay a lot for it, which stifles demand and makes the problem worse.

Anyway... I'm totally willing to hear counterarguments and certainly on the side of the workers, but the knee-jerk downvote and talk about how everyone needs a living wage isn't helping dive into the nuance of how these businesses operate and make money and what impact this decision will have on the business model.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Life was just fine before those services you’re worried about losing. They aren’t necessary.

[-] soloner@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I can say that too, and I agree with it. It's easy to say that.

Meanwhile the folks who relied on it as some part time extra cash just lost that option.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago

I thought the invisible hand of the market was a good thing...

If your business plan cannot make a profit under the laws of where you want to operate, why should anyone care?

[-] Sabata11792@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Good. If you can't afford to pay your employees minimum wage, you should die as a business.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guess who's about to keep all employee tips... A minimum wage is a great first step, but stricter regulation will be needed to curtail the absurd levels of greed from these megacorps.

[-] weedazz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Guess who's going to stop playing 20% for tips now that I don't have to subsidize a subhuman wage?

[-] Ibex0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Javi_in_4k@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

To those who live there: How does $18/hour in NYC compare to $20/hour in California (for the fast food thing recently passed here)? Is that a living wage there?

[-] Artaca@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago

Household income for me and my wife was around $150k and we got priced out of the city. A lot of Dashers take late night trains deep deep outside of the city, or they live with half a dozen other Dashers on alternating schedules, sharing beds.

[-] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not a resident of either but it's worth mentioning that this is NYC not NY state and California probably has suburban and rural areas that are much, much cheaper cost of living than NYC.

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
597 points (100.0% liked)

News

23297 readers
3470 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS