86
submitted 2 days ago by remington@beehaw.org to c/usnews@beehaw.org
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SARGE@startrek.website 44 points 2 days ago

"Your honor, I object!"

"Why is that?"

"It's devastating to my case!"

[-] protogen420 57 points 2 days ago

THATS WHY IT NEEDS TO BE RELEASED

[-] Wytch@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 days ago

Cool. Release the files.

[-] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 39 points 2 days ago

Gracious no, we wouldn't want one of his primary accomplices to be inconvenienced by people seeing the full details of your actions...

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 days ago

Why would that be? What could possibly be in those files, that makes her look even more guilty than a convicted sex trafficker?

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 24 points 2 days ago

It never occurred to me that releasing these files might cause child traffickers and rapists to actually have CONSEQUENCES. The horror. Anyways...

[-] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 18 points 2 days ago

If it can, then it should. This should all be public information, and every unredacted detail should be made clear to the public so that no one can overlook it.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 19 points 2 days ago

"Prejudiced" by seeing the facts of the case? Right. That's kind of the point, yes.

[-] cheeseburger@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Please become an hero, Ghislaine.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 12 points 2 days ago

It's a risk we all are willing to take.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago

Everything is so backwards. Releasing facts and proof someone knowingly trafficked children to be raped might have an affect on their appeal!? That's exactly why they need to be released. So the crimes that happened have a light shown on them, and victims have a chance for some semblance of justice.

[-] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Good?

If your appeal requires everyone to have less information about what really went down, then I think were better off with you not having your appeal heard, no?

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 10 points 2 days ago

There's no way "more information I don't have could be incriminating" can be spun positively, so we have this from her lawyers.

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 days ago

Sounds good to me

[-] Avicenna@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago

Oh no. Anyways

[-] lorski@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 days ago
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 6 points 2 days ago

"Out of respect for ~~this fucking criminal~~ Maxwell we've decided not to release the files in their entirety. We wish her the best!"

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago
[-] foodandart@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago

Too fucking bad, cunt.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2025
86 points (100.0% liked)

U.S. News

2543 readers
65 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.


Guidelines for submissions:

For World News, see the News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS