1084
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I just don't think there's that much copper in a camera. That's a lot of weight for a camera by itself.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It's true! Little known fact, they also have their own catalytic converter

[-] Eh_I@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Gold coin pop out the top WAA-HOO

[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago

There seems to be 2 main camps in this thread.

Fuck the police, and fuck shitty drivers.

Both camps are correct.

[-] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Government surveillance tracking device you mean? Enrich the local cops devices? Over half of violations monies collected goes to the corporations that market them to local and state officials with lavish dinners and vacations devices? Financial incentive to calibrate them to flag innocent drivers knowing there is little to no recourse against the company devices? 5.5 lbs you say?

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago

Gonna be downvoted, because apparently this is car brain central, but the amount of mental gymnastics people will do to make red light camera enforcement "bad" is crazy.

The US' private company control over these cameras notwithstanding.

Fuck me, so many people die on on roads, and especially at intersections.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

The US’ private companies

this is entirely the problem, because they're turning over info to ICE and other agencies and it's being used oppressively.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

The city I work for put up Flock cameras with specific instructions from Council that they were only to be used for identification of cars flagged in active warrants.

Within a week of their installation, police used the cameras to track the movements of someone who filed a complaint.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Fuck the police

[-] yourgodlucifer@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 day ago

I just don't think having this kind of surveillance state apparatus is ever worth it I don't want the government or private companies tracking my every move.

I don't even own a car and I want these cameras gone.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 50 seconds ago

I don't want the government or private companies tracking my every move

This is an issue with how the cameras are operated. I'm taking issue with people complaining that these cameras exist at all.

People claiming no system could ever be privacy-preserving aren't being very imaginative.

I agree the surveillance state is bad, but taking a picture of someone running a red light and sending them a fine is a good thing, sorry.

What's bad is allowing cameras to passively record every single licence plate at all times and store that information. A speed or red light camera should only take a photo/video when it detects someone speeding/running a red light, and no other information should be stored.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 22 points 1 day ago

On the one hand, omnipresent surveillance is bad and ripe for abuse.

On the other, I feel like the haphazard and selective enforcement of traffic laws by police officers is also really bad. Cops can selectively enforce laws so poor people or black people or whatever out-group suffers more. A machine should be impartial.

On the last hand, no traffic enforcement is probably going to get people killed. So that's not desirable.

Also, fines are problematic. Fines should probably scale with wealth, but also it shouldn't be a revenue source because that's a perverse incentive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] echodot@feddit.uk 37 points 1 day ago

I'm a little confused, do you want people running red lights in the name of "personal liberty, yeehaw" because that seems like a bad idea.

[-] kuhli@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, I just haven't seen any evidence red light cameras are effective.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/red-light-cameras-may-not-make-streets-safer/

Also I don't like everything being under camera surveillance, so I need a strong justification to be fine with more of it

[-] merc@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Red light cameras may not be effective at making streets safer. But, they're nearly 100% effective at making people who run red lights pay fines. The first one would be amazing, but I'm happy to settle for the second one.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Sure, remove the red light but please also remove cars.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
1084 points (100.0% liked)

memes

18251 readers
2938 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS