58

We all know the pattern by now. Something minor happens. One of the affected parties doesn't want people talking about it. So they go on a crusade against anyone tha makes a small mention about the thing which ends up making the thing super famous.

It is called the Streisand effect after Barbara Streisand who famously went through such a thing. But for all the fame the effect has, how many people actually still remember what it was originally about, without looking it up?

I certainly don't. I'm pretty sure I looked it up once but apparently it wasn't interesting enough to remember. This just proves once again that ignoring the thing is much more effective than trying to silence talk about the thing.

Kind of similar to the Watergate scandal and all subsequent -gates. I think it's about some spy drama revealing the president's crimes at the Watergate Hotel that led to Richard Nixon resigning but that's about it. And that's probably wrong.

Now that I think about it (I should really get out of this shower) there are probably tons of idioms that are even further removed from their origin. I bet some are so far removed that we don't even register them as being idioms. They're just words.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 24 points 3 days ago

Somebody took shots from the air of her home. She tried to get them removed from the public sphere. That caused headlines and as a result more people saw them attached to these news stories than ever would have if she hadn't made an issue out of it.

Didn't google, didn't read the other comments.

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 10 points 3 days ago

Nah dude, that was Nelson Mandela. You're thinking of the Berenstein Effect.

[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 7 points 3 days ago

You can take your gaslight and shove it up your Baader-Meinhof-Effect!

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 4 points 3 days ago

Classic Godwin's Razor reply.

[-] Hello_there@fedia.io 31 points 3 days ago

Streisand didn't want aerial images of her house to be available on the internet. The subsequent outrage made it so those pictures got on newspapers nationwide.

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

Well, that actually doesn't seem unreasonable.

"Please stop photographing my private property."

Pictures of property go in newspapers instead

I mean......she has a point.....

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 days ago

Thing is, it wasn’t labeled as HER house; I don’t even think the photographer knew. They just took a picture of a large house on a beachside cliff.

Once she began making a big deal out of it though, every newspaper and website had it published. She made it worse by making it a thing. It was the original celebrity self-own of the internet era.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

And it was inside a huge (10k+) batch of pictures documenting the entire California coastline. Basically nobody had even seen it at the time she, or at least her lawyer, threw a fit about it.

[-] Trex202@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Victim blaming and gaslighting

[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

??? How am I blaming her? Am I misunderstanding you?

[-] Trex202@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The Streisand effect itself is victim blaming

I see what you mean. In my experience of the internet it's called "The Streisand Effect" only when the person complaining about something (and therefore giving an issue attention that it otherwise wouldn't have received) is generally considered to be "in the wrong" on the issue. I can't think of a case where someone received blowback for speaking up about an issue (professional repercussions, exclusion from social circles, "cancelling" by various parties, w/e) but was considered to be in the right by the the people calling it "The Streisand Effect". It feels like there's a necessary component of "you complained about something you shouldn't have and were justly punished for it" schadenfreude attached to the term that differentiates it: if you don't have that you're just bravely and correctly shining a light on an injustice and it's not called "The Streisand Effect", it's just raising awareness or something.

I think you're being downvoted because the victim of the alleged injustice complaining about that injustice and then deserving the backlash is baked into the term, and calling it "victim blaming" feels off, but it technically is, it's just that calling something "The Streisand Effect" implies that the "victim" in the situation deserved what they got because they complained about something trivial, or an effect of privilege, or some other thing that, in the eyes of the public, makes them unworthy of sympathy. But I think carrying that implication of guilt means that it is, technically, victim blaming, and the person using the term "The Streisand Effect" implicitly agrees that the victim deserves blame for their actions. And knowing the internet, I doubt this assessment is correct 100% of the time.

I'm curious to see if other people agree with this assessment. I haven't done any research on whether my experience of the term is shared by other people, so this may not be a strong theory. Just a thought that spawned off your comment. But it is an interesting perspective.

[-] starlinguk@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

There was no "victim" originally. She turned herself into one by pointing out that it was her house. Before that nobody knew.

[-] early_riser@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I hate those sayings that nobody ever finishes. “Speak of the devil” didn’t make sense until I learned the rest “…and he shall appear.” “Better the devil you know…” is another one. There are more I can’t remember off the top of my head.

[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 1 points 2 days ago

This goes so far as to totally obscure the meaning of the original saying. It's not just "The customer is always right." It's "The customer is always right in matters of taste."

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

it was about this photographThe original image of Barbra Streisand's cliff-top residence in Malibu, California, which she attempted to suppress in 2003

Of course I went to the wikipedia article to get a link the actual image to post here, but, to answer your question: yes I did in fact remember what the photo looks like without looking it up.

I'd forgotten that the term was coined by Mike Masnick, though.

[-] dontsayaword@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

I have a pretty bad memory and I still knew what caused the name. But I was aware of it when it happened, not learning about it much later. That probably helps.

[-] radix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

I do. I've been reading Techdirt for over 25 years, so I'm sure I read the original post where the term was coined at the time it was first published.

[-] xorollo@leminal.space 1 points 2 days ago

Wow! I only very recently found techdirt.

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

🙋 Language evolves in weird tangential ways. Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra isn't too far off from reality tbh.

[-] SGforce@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

It was really the south park episode that did it.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

38438 readers
363 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS