190
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemmy.cafe to c/linux@programming.dev

With the Linux Vendor Firmware Service serving more than 135 million downloads for Linux users updating their system and device firmware, LVFS has been working to get more hardware vendors to contribute either engineering resources or directly contributing annual dues as sponsors. Framework Computer is now the first one to have executed an agreement under these new sponsorship efforts.

Red Hat in employing lead developer Richard Hughes has contributed the most to LVFS/Fwupd's success, the Linux Foundation has also hosted the project since it has shifted into their umbrella, AMD's Mario Limonciello is among the significant contributors, and now Framework Computer is a new sponsor to the project.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 67 points 1 week ago

Given the precedent with Framework: does somebody know if the maintainer of FWUpd is right-wing?

[-] yessikg@fedia.io 51 points 1 week ago

This might be damage control

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 week ago

Cool, but I don't care how big Framework makes their tent. They will not see a cent from me.

[-] surfrock66@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago

Purity testing everything you use means you have to get off Lemmy, if you look at the statements from some of the core devs. It is no way to live and is pretty much incompatible with being on the internet. Framework is clearly doing more good than harm, and while no company is perfect or immune from critique, feedback from customers does more than knee-jerk comments from people with no stakes.

[-] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

It's not a purity test, it's boycotting an admitted Nazi friendly organization. When Framework chose to embrace, financially support, and then when called out on it, specifically state that the Nazis are welcome in their big tent, that tent became a Nazi tent. That's not a tent me or many others want to be in, because that makes the Nazis feel welcome and free to attack anyone else in the tent with no repercussions and with the full, spoken support of Framework.

Fuck that, and fuck you if you don't like it.

[-] surfrock66@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Counterpoint. This line of thinking is what got me living under an ACTUAL fascist regime right now. People did purity testing with Harris on whatever issue, pick your poison (Gaza, police accountability, etc) and it moved the needle. How much will never be known, but a chunk of people spent so much time listening to talking heads and streamers that they decided to not vote for her. And now we have Trump, destabilizing the world, letting a guy with brain worms decide everyone's health. Harris would have been the best option by far even if she was not perfect, but fixing good was always a better option than rejecting not-perfect. If framework goes away, good luck getting another right-to-repair first org to build hardware. There has never been a better time to make the point "stop purity testing things, acknowledge when things are the better option, and work to make them even better." All this "us vs. them" and using language that paints anything as black or white moves the needle on people passively reading comments, and does actual harm. Living in a world without a grey area does actual harm.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago

I phone banked for Harris but she was making our jobs harder by taking unpopular positions. What will you have me say to the voter who won't vote for a Newsom presidency because they take AIPAC money? Because I was told to just move on and call the next person.

[-] surfrock66@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

You tell them to plug their nose and swallow the medicine because the consequences of not choosing the better of 2 options in a 2 party system is loss of life and rights for innumerable people all over the world.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 8 points 1 week ago

I don't think I have ever seen that explanation work on someone who is misinformed, but if I am proven wrong then the world will be a better place.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, I just don't give them any money. If I were to procure a Framework Laptop by means of a genie wish, I would still use it. I am probably using a ton of open source software right now made by people I can't stand. Also I can purity check and boycott whoever I like, whenever I like. I don't have to live by your rules. You do you.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

So you'd rather buy a laptop from a vendor that gives price breaks to ICE, such as Dell and HP, or one indirectly owned by the CCP such as Lenovo? That's certainly a choice.

[-] spartanatreyu@programming.dev 4 points 6 days ago

Or

... you could just buy from another company like framework but without the nazi shit.

Like: https://novacustom.com/

Configure what laptop you want and buy it.

If any random part breaks, you can buy a replacement and switch it out.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

Never heard of these guys, thanks for posting that. Their prices are a bit rough, but so are Framework's these days. Do they offer board schematics like Framework does?

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

buy used or third party refurbished. just because all the big tech companies are evil is no reason to excuse evil in small tech

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

K, so then don't buy a computer because no company is perfect.

[-] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

or… you could buy used or third party refurbished. there's so much equipment out there for the having that's totally usable for most people. which is consistent with what i said before. if you absolutely must buy new, yeah, make appraisal of the ethical contributions to the world of what's available, but yeah. all these companies are evil so buying pre-owned equipment limits how much they can exploit us, which is why i said that before

[-] princessnorah 1 points 6 days ago

one indirectly owned by the CCP such as Lenovo?

You could say this about literally every Chinese owned company. Eliminate all Chinese and all American companies and there's not a lot of goods left you could purchase. Even less when it comes to goods made for other companies in China by Chinese firms.

[-] PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

That's exactly my point though. If I'm supposed to vote for the lesser of two evils, shouldn't I be applying that to the rest of my life?

[-] princessnorah 1 points 1 day ago

Wait, are you arguing that the US is the lesser of two evils in this situation? Like, right now, this United States of America, the one that has a fascist regime in power?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

This isn't purity testing, this is not giving money to fascist fucks who actually want to see me and my family dead.

[-] Corbin@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago

Your analogy is bogus because this is the Fediverse and we can defederate from tankies without giving them money. The entire topic revolves around how Framework spends money. Whataboutism in this context is a classic defense of fascism, for what it's worth.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So you won't buy the most user maintainable and repairable laptop, that also comes with Linux and probably worth open source firmware in the not too distant future because you don't like the politics of the owner of an open source project the company supports?

That really feels like cutting off your nose to spite your face

[-] aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago

I mean, when the political stance of the supported company is "I would literally murder you of I could" the politics become kinda relevant 🥲

[-] HaraVier@discuss.online 12 points 1 week ago

Is that some hyperbole? Or is there a source to that? I'm out of the loop*, so apologies for my ignorance.

[-] aichan@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Yes... But sadly no? First example that comes to mind, you can check "dhh blog" on the internet (🤮) and if you read enough you will get to see the kind of person he is... You can also check this about Hyprland: https://drewdevault.com/2023/09/17/Hyprland-toxicity.html

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] cm0002@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 week ago
[-] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They openly support fashtech like Hyperland and the "distro" Omarchy. In response to the well-justified backlash against this, founder Nirav Patel tried to hand wave the issue away by talking about how they want "a big tent" for open source", completely ignoring the nazi cunts behind the projects they support.

If you want to know more details here a two articles:

[-] psud@aussie.zone 20 points 1 week ago

Why do you use Lemmy, given the politics of its own source creator? Bit hypocritical.

[-] Pandasdontfly@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 week ago

Not to speak for them but bare minimum one is supporting them monetarily, one is free

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

You're not directly paying them, but by being here and contributing to the community, you're providing value to others who would then go on to donate to the devs.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'm sure I can also find some fascists who work on the linux kernel. As long as I don't support them directly I am just fine with using linux. But go on, keep moving the goal posts.

[-] howrar@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago

I'm not sure where the goal post was to begin with. I just thought it would be important to be aware of how we're all contributing to the project so that we can make an informed decision. I haven't thought this through enough to have an opinion on whether we should boycott either Framework or Lemmy.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.cafe 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is no "one community" in the traditional sense, in fact many of us are boycotting contributions to their actual community/instance .ml

By contributing activity to comms on other instances and advocating growth on other instances and even advocating alternatives like PieFed, actually dilutes their influence

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago

You nor this article say wtf is LVFS

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

It's the thing that goes fwup!

[-] wasabi@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago

A system to get firmware updates (BIOS, Touchpad and much more) like regular software updates on Linux.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

That's great to hear!

[-] MystValkyrie 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Who cares? I left the big tent a while ago.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
190 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

10461 readers
601 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS